re: Mississippi wins right to enforce religious exemptions law

so here we go. Liberals, the walking double standards.

answer honestly

Christians must bake cakes for gays and muslims right?

Does a muslim baker have to bake a cake for a gay couple? What about a Christian?

As per the norm, almost ANY liberal talking point can be destroyed...... by simply reversing it. The double standards are just too embedded in every point of their IDENTITY politics.

Of course you know, sharia law demands that they say, frick the cake, take that gay couple up to the roof, and throw them off.

quote:

---

As per the norm, almost ANY liberal talking point can be destroyed...... by simply reversing it.

---

This is why they try to keep it narrow and act like talking about other things is "changing the subject".

I'm 100% ok with women hiring just women.......blacks hiring just blacks.........gays refusing to take photos at catholic weddings.......liberals refusing to cater conservative events..........and on and on.

There is literally no choice of liberty with their own labor that I would begrudge a liberal. I think it takes an a-hole to try and force a gay guy to be hired as a photographer at an event where he knows the participants are against his political beliefs or hell, are openly anti-gay. I would flatly defend any gay man's right to say "no" to such a circumstance.

It's a matter of having respect for what other people are comfortable doing even if you think their reasons are silly.

Too bad they won't afford that respect in return.

quote:

---

Evangelists: I want to tell gay people they can't do things because of my religion

---

Where exactly are we talking about telling people they can't do something?

quote:

---

why do you right wingers hide behind religion when we all know its just because your scared of the gays?

---

I'm atheist and I would never refuse a gay person service.

LOL @ the blizzard of rightwing cliches in this thread.

Okay then, explain it.

And explain why it should be okay to treat people differently based on who they are attracted to sexually.

quote:

---

LOL @ the blizzard of rightwing cliches in this thread.

---

Such as

quote:

---

Look at you

---

keep trying. Keep on.

quote:

---

kay then, explain it.

And explain why it should be okay to treat people differently based on who they are attracted to sexually

---

sheesh man. I saw your last post. I'm only so fast. I hadn't seen this one

The explanation is easy. Giving somebody the Liberty to choose how they use their labor isn't preventing anyone else from doing Jack

As far as why it should be okay. Well I didn't say anything about okay. I said the government shouldn't be in the business of telling people how to use their labor

Besides. Your question is too narrow. I mean I think it's completely stupid tonight serve somebody just because they're gay. But it's entirely reasonable to not want to have to take part in a gay wedding

But why are you so attached to leaving it just with gay? Discrimination in America isn't restricted the gays.