- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Minnesota Shooter: Let's Wait for the Facts
Posted on 6/15/25 at 9:06 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 6/15/25 at 9:06 am to SlowFlowPro
By cutting and pasting an unverified religion opinion piece picked up by Wired to...in your opinion...to give it some validation.
You are slipping SFP, this was too easy.
You and IBM should go play in the street.
You are slipping SFP, this was too easy.
You and IBM should go play in the street.
Posted on 6/15/25 at 9:07 am to dickkellog
Unfortunately he is one, I’ve seen his website. Best part though is he’s a fat goober.
Posted on 6/15/25 at 9:07 am to dickkellog
quote:
his wife was a congressional staffer for walz
Dick, as I said, THIS was the one thing I was actually researching but couldn't find. You said you KNOW that's true. Please provide evidence of how you KNOW that's true. Otherwise, we will know you're lying.
You keep accusing me of being a lying idiot, but you never have any proof...just your addled accusations.
Posted on 6/15/25 at 9:09 am to Wolfhound45
quote:
Enlighten me brilliant one.
So IvoryBill posted a picture of an article. A DKE victim claimed that was a picture, not a source. I found what I believe was the exact website that was screenshotted to create the picture, verifying both the existence of the actual article (for the DKE victim) and I quoted from it.
That quoting involved this
quote:
In another sermon at the church, one of three he gave from 2021 to 2023, according to Wired,
So then, I left a direct link to the referenced Wired article.
So clearly the RNS was citing Wired and Wired was the source
quote:
And also answer my question of you having seen Religion News Service prior to yesterday.
I haven't. That's irrelevant. Posting that link was directly in response to the silliness of imjustafatkid (for reasons stated above)
Posted on 6/15/25 at 9:09 am to Houag80
quote:
By cutting and pasting an unverified religion opinion piece picked up by Wired to...in your opinion...to give it some validation.
You are slipping SFP, this was too easy.
You and IBM should go play in the street.
I believe the Bible warns against casting pearls before swine. It's useless to try to debate factually with some of you.
Posted on 6/15/25 at 9:09 am to Houag80
quote:
You're trying too hard, dicklick.
How? People are asking for facts/research and I'm providing it.
Posted on 6/15/25 at 9:10 am to IvoryBillMatt
You are diverting from God's teachings. Tsk, tsk, ktsk
Posted on 6/15/25 at 9:10 am to dickkellog
quote:
let me just cut you off at the pass homey i don't give a schit about anything you would reply to me, for the record, i don't believe you're a lawyer, i think anyone that post 1/2 a million times on the poli board is probably on social security disability because you sure as he11 don't have a real job and you're not a real person
are we clear?
Posted on 6/15/25 at 9:12 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
How? People are asking for facts/research and I'm providing it.
This is what I hate about this Board. "Show me the evidence....not THAT evidence!"
Posted on 6/15/25 at 9:13 am to Houag80
quote:
By cutting and pasting an unverified religion opinion piece
This article is none of these things.
There is the referenced video, time-stamped to his preaching.
This post was edited on 6/15/25 at 9:13 am
Posted on 6/15/25 at 9:14 am to IvoryBillMatt
Ahhh, success. I have both of you charlatans teaming up to cast aspersions on my character.
I love it!
Hope you have an enlightening "church" service. Perhaps it will give you some clarity and insight on how to avoid confrontation where you continually get your arse kicked.
I love it!
Hope you have an enlightening "church" service. Perhaps it will give you some clarity and insight on how to avoid confrontation where you continually get your arse kicked.
Posted on 6/15/25 at 9:14 am to NashvilleTider
quote:
Sorry but the sermons are likely ai
He was lib and nothing anyone can try to do will change that - all the trusted right media Twitter accounts had the goods yesterday on this guy and their track record is 1000x better than wired or the msm at large.
Sorry libs but your side is the mentally ill side we are the stable geniuses
I know it hurts your psyche and your pride to know you’re on the side of complete nut job murderers, but I’m sure you’re used to it by now
This is a fact. Well said.
Posted on 6/15/25 at 9:14 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
This is what I hate about this Board. "Show me the evidence....not THAT evidence!"
quote:
quote:
How does that establish "leftist?"
Just wait until the inevitable claims that any evidence showing he wasn't a leftist is fake/manufactured by the deep state
![]()
LINK
Posted on 6/15/25 at 9:15 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Do you still think the shooter was a Lefty???
Too much of a coincidence that he picked those 2 senators who voted against the Democrats on the healthcare for illegals bill. You know Pelosi and Biden consistently say they are against abortion as a matter of personal beliefs. They always walk that line.
This post was edited on 6/15/25 at 9:17 am
Posted on 6/15/25 at 9:16 am to Houag80
quote:
to cast aspersions on my character.
Where have I spoke of you or any characteristic of you?
Posted on 6/15/25 at 9:16 am to SlowFlowPro
So you going with he was a conservative and duped Tim Walz for decades? 
Posted on 6/15/25 at 9:17 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
by SlowFlowPro
O/U 14.5 pages
Posted on 6/15/25 at 9:18 am to Jbird
quote:
So you going with he was a conservative and duped Tim Walz for decades?
Just because Watlz appointed him to something doesn't mean they had to align politically. That's a YUGE assumption (made, not ironically, by people who have poisoned their brains to see the world in that binary, in/out group fashion).
There is a MOUNTAIN of evidence to show he was quite conservative.
The only thing you have to rely upon is circumstantial evidence comprised of nothing more than a framed and biased assumption.
Posted on 6/15/25 at 9:19 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Your way back machine, so he is a dyed in the wool conservative and accepting positions from a baby murderer.
There is a MOUNTAIN of evidence to show he was quite conservative.
Popular
Back to top


2




