- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Minneapolis police shoot child on his porch with hot paintball rounds - Jerk cop
Posted on 5/31/20 at 2:57 pm to LSUconvert
Posted on 5/31/20 at 2:57 pm to LSUconvert
Licking boots and living free woohoo! Burn it down pussy do it!
Posted on 5/31/20 at 2:57 pm to Jbird
quote:
Burn it down pussy do it!
You're name calling, how cute.
Posted on 5/31/20 at 2:58 pm to LSUconvert
Aw I forgot you got them big balls! Dollar General awaits you!
Posted on 5/31/20 at 2:58 pm to LSUconvert
quote:
Do you mind if I ask you how you'd protest your rights being trampled on?
I don't go to protest because i find them to be a stupid waste of time.
quote:
If a government agent came to your door with lethal force demanding you give up your firearms. Would you hand them over because protesting violently is not allowed by the constitution?
Why is this always the same stupid gotcha asked by all of you "libertarian" types?
First of all you can't say you are defending the constitution by wiping your arse with it. Armed conflict with the government is NOT a constitutional right. Also the government unconstitutionally confiscating firearms without ratifying the constitution to repeal the 2nd amendment would be tyrannical. I would not be with in the law to fire on those police i would be in open rebellion and would have to take my licks if i were alone. There for i would not be protesting at that point i would be rebelling.
Posted on 5/31/20 at 3:00 pm to Navtiger1
quote:
i would be in open rebellion and would have to take my licks if i were alone.
Open rebellion is violent protest.
quote:
There for i would not be protesting at that point i would be rebelling.
See above.
Posted on 5/31/20 at 3:02 pm to TigerintheNO
quote:
-state police, local police, national guard enforcing the curfew -curfew means you must be inside your home -people in various neighborhoods were arming themselves and waiting on their porches in case the protest spilled into their neighborhoods.
Bs you dont have to be inside.
quote:
According to the order, during that time all people "must not travel on any public street or in any public place
I don’t consider being on a privately owned porch to be traveling in public space. These cops in the video are wrong. Bootlickers are wrong.
Posted on 5/31/20 at 3:09 pm to LSUconvert
quote:
Open rebellion is violent protest.
Sure. Again in the loosest possible sense.
Rebellion:
quote:
an act of violent or open resistance to an established government or ruler.
"the authorities put down a rebellion by landless
the action or process of resisting authority, control, or convention. "an act of teenage rebellion"
Protest:
quote:
a statement or action expressing disapproval of or objection to something.
Rebellion would be beyond protest. A protest is an objection seeking a change from those in power, a rebellion is seeking to change those in power.
Posted on 5/31/20 at 3:12 pm to Buckeye Jeaux
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/13/21 at 7:59 am
Posted on 5/31/20 at 3:18 pm to Moustache
quote:
frick them. They destroy the city and law needs to be restored. This is what happens. Should've fricking listened. He told them like 4 times.
those cops I'm sure have seen reports of dozens of officers being killed and injured across the country by these thug animals.
Who cares? They have no authority to make you go inside your own house. Curfew order says no travel in public places, not be inside hiding. Police continue lacking self control and abusing authority. Thats the reason why theres riots in the first place.
Posted on 5/31/20 at 3:19 pm to Navtiger1
quote:
Rebellion would be beyond protest.
It's not tiered.
All rebellions are protests, not all protests are rebellions.
quote:
A protest is an objection seeking a change from those in power, a rebellion is seeking to change those in power.
This delineation is fabricated.
Posted on 5/31/20 at 3:28 pm to LSUconvert
quote:
All rebellions are protests, not all protests are rebellions.
Sure all fights are arguments, but not all arguments are fights.
But and argument is not a crime and a fight is. At this point i'm really not even sure what the hell stupid point you are trying to make other than arguing (not fighting) to argue.
But back to your original stupid gotcha. The only way i come out of my "protest" alive is the over through of the now tyrannical government. Because in every other scenario i have committed multiple crimes...much like the people rioting right now.
Posted on 5/31/20 at 4:01 pm to AMS
quote:
Bs you dont have to be inside
local TV station says you have to be inside- jump to 2 minute mark
also the segment says police reported that they hit people with batons to get them inside
This post was edited on 5/31/20 at 4:05 pm
Posted on 5/31/20 at 4:08 pm to Buckeye Jeaux
This is why we have the 2nd amendment
Posted on 5/31/20 at 4:12 pm to Navtiger1
quote:
But and argument is not a crime and a fight is.
Right, protesting isn't always against the law, rebellion is.
quote:
At this point i'm really not even sure what the hell stupid point you are trying to make other than arguing (not fighting) to argue.
My point is that you have your own line at which you deem violent protest reasonable.
Posted on 5/31/20 at 4:22 pm to the808bass
quote:
Hey rog. So you agree with Buckeye Jeaux that the two situations are completely analogous.
In as much as the police have no right to do either, yeah.
Posted on 5/31/20 at 4:28 pm to TigerintheNO
quote:
local TV station says you have to be inside- jump to 2 minute mark
also the segment says police reported that they hit people with batons to get them inside
Curfew says no public travel. I guess there’s actually a clause that you’re expected to follow orders, but no wording that you have to be inside. That’s some bootlicker shite on your own property. Disgusting look going onto people’s property with batons. Police acting like animals is what caused riots in the first place.
Posted on 5/31/20 at 4:34 pm to Buckeye Jeaux
What part of get inside didn't they understand?
Popular
Back to top


2







