- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan has been found guilty of felony obstruction
Posted on 12/18/25 at 9:46 pm to Decatur
Posted on 12/18/25 at 9:46 pm to Decatur
quote:
I don’t think she owed a duty to ICE for an administrative warrant. It’s her court. She can process someone as quickly or take as long as she wants.
Well..if you were her attorney she could sue you for malpractice for that advice.
0
Posted on 12/18/25 at 9:47 pm to Decatur
quote:This was not a tort case.
I don’t think she owed a duty to ICE
Posted on 12/18/25 at 9:49 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
My faith in humanity needle budged off zero a little - just a little. I’m surprised they didn’t get a ringer or 2 on the jury who ignored the law.
FAFO
FAFO
Posted on 12/18/25 at 9:53 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
It’s not over til the sentencing. Let’s see if they actually make her pay.
Posted on 12/18/25 at 9:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
So once she told ICE agents to go to see the Chief Judge, what were her options? Did she have to wait for those ICE agents to return outside of her court room? Was she required to make sure they left out the exact door from which they entered? That’s what I’ve been struggling with.
Posted on 12/18/25 at 9:55 pm to Decatur
quote:
So once she told ICE agents to go to see the Chief Judge, what were her options? Did she have to wait for those ICE agents to return outside of her court room?
No.
She could have just done court normally.
The question is why she went out of her way to NOT run her court normally, and the answer to that question is why she's a felon.
Posted on 12/18/25 at 10:00 pm to Decatur
Guy that defends a piss dossier can't figure out what the frick the judge did wrong.
Posted on 12/18/25 at 10:01 pm to CDawson
quote:
It’s not over til the sentencing. Let’s see if they actually make her pay.
Federal judges used to be held within the constraints of sentencing guidelines. Ive had conversations with some where they bitched about having to sentence 50 gram of crack dudes with more time than bank robbers - rightfully so. . I’ve been out of the game for 10 years - LEA, not a lawyer - maybe someone will expound.
This post was edited on 12/18/25 at 10:02 pm
Posted on 12/18/25 at 10:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
She could have just done court normally.
Ok she could do that. But how far out of range of that before it becomes a felony?
Posted on 12/18/25 at 10:17 pm to Decatur
I mean we don't have to go with a "grey area" example b/c her behavior was so flagrant and outside the bounds of normalcy.
Like, I like to do the thing where you use the extreme example to remove a binary argument, and her actions are at one of those poles in this scenario.
As I said earlier, ignoring the criminal context, that's a blatant ethical violation and violation of the judicial canon.
Like, I like to do the thing where you use the extreme example to remove a binary argument, and her actions are at one of those poles in this scenario.
As I said earlier, ignoring the criminal context, that's a blatant ethical violation and violation of the judicial canon.
Posted on 12/18/25 at 10:22 pm to Decatur
quote:
So once she told ICE agents to go to see the Chief Judge, what were her options? Did she have to wait for those ICE agents to return outside of her court room? Was she required to make sure they left out the exact door from which they entered? That’s what I’ve been struggling with.
Her option was to not take the criminal illegal out the side door in an attempt to avoid ICE.
Posted on 12/18/25 at 10:23 pm to Decatur
quote:
Ok she could do that. But how far out of range of that before it becomes a felony?
The obstruction part.
Posted on 12/18/25 at 10:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
As I said earlier, ignoring the criminal context, that's a blatant ethical violation and violation of the judicial canon.
Yep. Wisconsin state bar is a strange one. You think they have a disciplinary hearing?
Posted on 12/18/25 at 10:25 pm to BBONDS25
They have to at this point
Posted on 12/18/25 at 10:32 pm to BBONDS25
Illuminating. 10/10
Posted on 12/18/25 at 10:42 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Hell yeah!!
Posted on 12/18/25 at 10:44 pm to CDawson
quote:
Let’s see if they actually make her pay.
At the very least she won't be able to practice law in Wisconsin. ...but she won't do time. Although she should.
Posted on 12/18/25 at 10:45 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Finally, one of these corrupt bastards will be locked up.
Its a start, anyway.
Its a start, anyway.
Posted on 12/18/25 at 10:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
They have to at this point
Agreed. But Wisconsin is weird. Don’t even have to pass a bar exam if you go to a Wisconsin law school.
Posted on 12/18/25 at 10:47 pm to Decatur
quote:
Illuminating. 10/10
She clearly obstructed. What’s your beef?
Page 2 of 4
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News