- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: MEMO: HIC Releases the Memo. Link to memo inside
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:52 am to DisplacedBuckeye
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:52 am to DisplacedBuckeye
I suspect there is a fair amount of information missing here. I also doubt that the Steele dossier was the sole basis for obtaining or renewing a FISA warrant. Not to mention the absurdly low standards even needed to reach the level of “probable cause.”
In summary, y’all got blue balled.
Again.
In summary, y’all got blue balled.
Again.
7
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:52 am to antibarner
quote:
Him
Who?
I'm betting no one is fearful of this.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:52 am to DisplacedBuckeye
You have proof there were foreign governments that altered the election?
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:52 am to igoringa
I'm glad and feel safe knowing that the most advanced and powerful intelligence agency the world has ever seen gets their top secret information from Yahoo articles 
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:52 am to a want
quote:
So, as per reporting from 3 days ago, the memo (written by Devon Nunes I'll remind you) says the FISA warrant for Carter Page based on the Steele Dossier is not legit....but it doesn't say anything about other evidence that would support the warrant....which is exactly what the FBI has pointed out.
Regardless of other evidence, why would an opposition dossier be included unless it was needed? It makes no sense to include such blatantly bias materiel, other than its needed
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:53 am to SleauxPlay
I suspect
you have no evidence of anything.
but you know. because youre "with her"
you have no evidence of anything.
but you know. because youre "with her"
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:53 am to Jjdoc
My goodness. I just read the entire memo. This is nothing that has not already been reported. I am afraid to say that the memo is pretty transparent. It will not stop any business as usual.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:53 am to themunch
quote:
You have proof there were foreign governments that altered the election?
That wasn't the assertion.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:53 am to SleauxPlay
quote:
I also doubt that the Steele dossier was the sole basis for obtaining or renewing a FISA warrant
the question remains: why use it, then?
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:53 am to DisplacedBuckeye
Stand, for we are Knights of the Odd Table.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:54 am to SleauxPlay
quote:
I also doubt that the Steele dossier was the sole basis for obtaining or renewing a FISA warrant.
Except McCabe testified without it they take their ball and go home. Try reading once and a while, does a body good.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:55 am to SleauxPlay
quote:
I suspect there is a fair amount of information missing here. I also doubt that the Steele dossier was the sole basis for obtaining or renewing a FISA warrant. Not to mention the absurdly low standards even needed to reach the level of “probable cause.”
In summary, y’all got blue balled.
Again.
Except then Deputy Director of the FBI Andrew McCabe testified that there would be no warrant without the Steele dossier
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:55 am to asurob1
quote:
This is a clear attempt to try to bring Mueller down.
Isn't Mueller still investigating? Furthermore, SHOULD he be investigating based on erroneous info to begin with?
Carter Page is already taking legal action per his tweet a few moments ago..
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:55 am to DisplacedBuckeye
Well there certainly is an assertion with mounting proof that the culprits being discussed conspired against an opposition party and then continued this against a sitting president.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:56 am to themunch
And?
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:56 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
the question remains: why use it, then?
The question which McCabe answers by saying they couldn't go for a warrant without it.
That testimony is nothing short of nuclear
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:56 am to DisplacedBuckeye
...
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:58 am to Jjdoc
It's actually a little underwhelming if you bother to read it. We knew all of this before its release. No big surprises.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:58 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The question remains: why use it, then?
Neither you nor I know what other evidence (if any) was presented. Neither you nor I know what proportion of the Steele dossier is accurate or nonsense. If it supported probable cause, can you really conceive of NO reason to use it in application/renewal of a FISA warrant?
This post was edited on 2/2/18 at 11:59 am
Page 12 of 22
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News