Started By
Message

re: Meanwhile, in another Georgia election back in 2022.…

Posted on 12/21/25 at 1:37 pm to
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
22762 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

So, the system works? Is that the story the conspiracy theorists are pushing now?


If I’m reading this correctly, the primary winner had to challenge the election board to do a recount, which showed a massive shift in votes. Only because she received no votes in her precinct, and knew she voted for herself

So, you are saying that candidates challenging election results is a designed control which was operating effectively here? Interesting, albeit logically inconsistent with your labeling of conspiracy theorists. Seems like “mitigating controls” would be better.
Posted by RohanGonzales
Member since Apr 2024
8325 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

So, the system works? Is that the story the conspiracy theorists are pushing now?


That is not the "system working" you stupid frick, The system working would be this not happening in the first place because it would be impossible to have it happen.

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466476 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

If I’m reading this correctly, the primary winner had to challenge the election board to do a recount,

Correct, a safeguard built into the system (that was utilized in 2020)

quote:

So, you are saying that candidates challenging election results is a designed control

That's why we have a specific legal process to review it and force a recount if necessary. Safeguards built into the system.

quote:

Interesting, albeit logically inconsistent with your labeling of conspiracy theorists.

Naw, because the CTs ignore that these same safeguards were used in 2020.

This story from 2022 shows the safeguards will catch issues, proving the system works.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466476 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

That is not the "system working" you stupid frick,

Except, it is?

quote:

The system working would be this not happening

There will be outlier events in any system, more frequent as the system relies on humans. That's why the systems have safeguards and review processes.

quote:

because it would be impossible to have it happen.


That's retarded. No system, especially one involving humans, will make outliers and/or failures "impossible".
Posted by GhostOfFreedom
Member since Jan 2021
13092 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 2:36 pm to
Jody Hice also questionably lost the primary to crook Brad Raffensperger for the elections important seat of Secretary of State.

The left and establishment had to secure that seat in both Georgia and Arizona. Probably Colorado, Nevada and California, too.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
48096 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

It doesn't take a large IQ to see these stories are nonsense

If you are intending to imply that this case "proves' anything at all with respect the security of election results, you lose.

Obviously the counting process within the machine does the arithmetic correctly..

What all of us who challenge the security of the 2020 election is not that the machine code failed to count the one and zeros properly.

Everyone, including you, knows that the root of the problem is the CHEATING by those involved in delivering the results to the public.

There should have been a full audit done - as was done in this case.

Certainly you are not still asserting that the results of the 2020 election is so obvious that no serious person could possibly doubt the results.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
46179 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 3:11 pm to
30th downvote!
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram