- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Matt Gaetz drops the hammer on Cohen
Posted on 2/26/19 at 5:42 pm to BlackHelicopterPilot
Posted on 2/26/19 at 5:42 pm to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:Me either
So, I'm not going to shed tears for Cohen.
By all means, bash the dude for being a liar and a shite witness, but having a girlfriend or not is pretty irrelevant to whether or not crimes have taken place
Anyway, I hope Gaetz does go down that road and makes an arse of himself again in front everybody
I love watching my congressman dance for his audience
Posted on 2/26/19 at 5:45 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
By all means, bash the dude for being a liar and a shite witness, but having a girlfriend or not is pretty irrelevant to whether or not crimes have taken place
I agree. But, I also know this shite happens often.
'I heard Shoo-Booty say "I'm gonna kill her" and I saw him kill her!'
"Sir, isn't it true that you smoke....WEED!!!!???"
Posted on 2/26/19 at 5:49 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:
Asking Cohen about his affairs goes directly to his credibility, especially since he's accusing someone of potential crimes. T
He tweeted this to stop the witness from testifying.
There is no way in hell he faces prosecution for this but censure is a distinct possibility.
Posted on 2/26/19 at 5:58 pm to Lsujacket66
I'm sure you're all going to be shocked to learn that Congressmembers are not immune from prosecution for federal witness tampering.

Posted on 2/26/19 at 6:03 pm to BlackHelicopterPilot
It's like the old adage.. Just because a woman's a whore, it doesn't mean she's blind
Posted on 2/26/19 at 6:03 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
It's past time you drop the charade
quote:
JuiceTerry

Posted on 2/26/19 at 6:04 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Just because a woman's a whore, it doesn't mean she's blind
Posted on 2/26/19 at 6:09 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
I'm sure you're all going to be shocked to learn that Congressmembers are not immune from prosecution for federal witness tampering.
I’m sure you will be shocked to learn that what gaetz did, while immature, comes nowhere near federal witness tampering. That won’t stop you from lying like you always do...but this isn’t even a close call. It’s clear as day.
This post was edited on 2/26/19 at 6:10 pm
Posted on 2/26/19 at 6:11 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
what gaetz did, while immature, comes nowhere near federal witness tampering.
That's really for prosecutors to determine. What, in your mind, was his purpose for threatening Michael Cohen on the eve of the latter's testimony before Congress? Be specific.
Posted on 2/26/19 at 6:12 pm to brian_wilson
quote:
wait a trump supporter is dinging someone for having a side piece?
Yep, per Mr Webster -hypocrites -
1 : a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue or religion
2 : a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings
Hmmm.
Posted on 2/26/19 at 6:12 pm to Lsujacket66
Sounds a lot like witness tampering
Posted on 2/26/19 at 6:13 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
That's really for prosecutors to determine. What, in your mind, was his purpose for threatening Michael Cohen on the eve of the latter's testimony before Congress? Be specific.
What's the problem with what Gaetz said?
Hes calling out a fraud and yall are mad about it lulz
Posted on 2/26/19 at 6:14 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
That's really for prosecutors to determine.
Ugh. Ok. Let’s go through it. What section of code do you claim Gaetz violated.
Here is how this will play out. You will google for a code section. You will post it. I will point out how it isn’t applicable and you will never return to the thread. But I’m willing to do this for you. Just to prove once and for all you have zero problem lying.
So.....what is the code section?
quote:
What, in your mind, was his purpose for threatening Michael Cohen on the eve of the latter's testimony before Congress? Be specific.
Yikes. See. This here is a strong indication you have zero idea how this works.
This post was edited on 2/26/19 at 6:16 pm
Posted on 2/26/19 at 6:18 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
What, in your mind, was his purpose for threatening Michael Cohen on the eve of the latter's testimony before Congress?
Ratings and to raise his own profile. His own statements indicate he wants Cohen to testify. Because witness tampering is a specific intent crime, you'd have to prove Gaetz had the intent to prevent Cohen from testifying, which his own statements from texts to Alex Ward contradict.
Gaetz: Watch tomorrow.
Ward: Will do -- anything I should be prepared for?
Gaetz: Fireworks
This post was edited on 2/26/19 at 6:20 pm
Posted on 2/26/19 at 6:20 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
So.....what is the code section?
I'm gonna go with 18 USC $ 1505 (not bothering to find the symbol on my keyboard shortcuts), which makes it a federal crime to use a threatening letter or communication to influence, obstruct, or impede an inquiry or investigation being conducted by a Congressional committee.
Since we both agree that what Gaetz did was try to influence Cohen's testimony, that should be fun for prosecutors.
Posted on 2/26/19 at 6:20 pm to Lsujacket66
Boy. The libs flocked to this thread like a fly to shite.
Posted on 2/26/19 at 6:25 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Since we both agree that what Gaetz did was try to influence Cohen's testimony, that should be fun for prosecutors.
Lie.
quote:
I'm gonna go with 18 USC $ 1505 (not bothering to find the symbol on my keyboard shortcuts), which makes it a federal crime to use a threatening letter or communication to influence, obstruct, or impede an inquiry or investigation being conducted by a Congressional committee.
Speech and debate clause.
Also Gaetz is one of the folks tasked with investigating.
Those are just two off the top of my head. Want to try again?
Posted on 2/26/19 at 6:26 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Speech and debate clause.
Twitter ain't the floor of the House.
quote:
Also Gaetz is one of the folks tasked with investigating.
Not at 5pm the day before on Twitter he isn't.
You're really bad at this.
Posted on 2/26/19 at 6:27 pm to Lsujacket66
Posted on 2/26/19 at 6:30 pm to Lsujacket66
There are 2 Matt Gaetz twitter accts. One official with his title and one plain Matt Gaetz but it has a blue check mark. 
Popular
Back to top


1







