- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Massive increase in cancer deaths in UK last year; probably climate change
Posted on 11/24/23 at 4:39 pm to onmymedicalgrind
Posted on 11/24/23 at 4:39 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
Again, cancer deaths will lag behind the introduction of a new carcinogen by much more than 2 years. This is basic stuff.
How long after the introduction of a new carcinogen does medical intervention typically/on average start?
1
Posted on 11/24/23 at 5:07 pm to David_DJS
Depends, do you have a specific example
Posted on 11/24/23 at 6:33 pm to ksayetiger
Don’t you dare question the safety of the jab
We had to save meemaw
We had to save meemaw
Posted on 11/24/23 at 7:29 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
Depends, do you have a specific example
I don't and understand there are a lot of variables. My question relates to this report. You mentioned it takes longer than a couple of years to go from the introduction of a new carcinogen to death, but the delay in medical intervention because of the Covid mess matters from the typical start of intervention to death, not the introduction of the carcinogen to death.
Posted on 11/24/23 at 7:32 pm to ksayetiger
The very same morons who get a weekly booster would also chop their dick off if the government told them to.
Posted on 11/24/23 at 10:25 pm to David_DJS
quote:
I don't and understand there are a lot of variables. My question relates to this report. You mentioned it takes longer than a couple of years to go from the introduction of a new carcinogen to death, but the delay in medical intervention because of the Covid mess matters from the typical start of intervention to death, not the introduction of the carcinogen to death.
The numbers in this report are cancer death rates from the year 2022. The vaccine came out, essentially, in 2021.
I'll put it like this: if every American was ordered to get weekly full body CT scans in 2021, we wouldn't see an increase in cancer death rates in 2022. Thats just not concordant with cancer biology.
Posted on 11/25/23 at 12:55 am to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
I'll put it like this: if every American was ordered to get weekly full body CT scans in 2021, we wouldn't see an increase in cancer death rates in 2022. Thats just not concordant with cancer biology.
You’re thinking vaxx. I’m asking about whether the spike in cancer deaths can be attributed to the delay in diagnoses/treatments of cancer in 2020, as has been suggested in the thread.
Posted on 11/25/23 at 1:04 am to ksayetiger
Vax. My in laws are from there/live there. Everyone over there got lots of shots.
Posted on 11/25/23 at 5:33 am to ksayetiger
My friend had a benign spot on his pancreas for 8 years, 11 months after the shot it became cancerous.
Posted on 11/25/23 at 5:58 am to ksayetiger
quote:
pro bono
Posted on 11/25/23 at 12:46 pm to David_DJS
quote:
You’re thinking vaxx.
Yes, because a majority of the initial responses to the OP where attributing this to the vaccine.
quote:
I’m asking about whether the spike in cancer deaths can be attributed to the delay in diagnoses/treatments of cancer in 2020, as has been suggested in the thread.
This is literally my first response in this thread:
quote:
This could be COVID lockdown related, but not sure how one could make a vaccine argument here. Overall, cancer doesn't kill you this quickly.
Shutting down society explains this data way better than vaccine/cancer biology.
Posted on 11/25/23 at 2:26 pm to onmymedicalgrind
Another poster mentioned IgG4 antibodies. Here is the LINK to the you tube channel he recommended.
Curious to hear your, or any other TD doctors, point of view or experience regarding IgG4 antibodies. Is it something that is often monitored with lab work? Might it be a concern regarding cancer?
Also, what about the DNA contamination found in the covid vaccines. Might it be a concern as well? LINK
Finally, can anyone envision any scenario, no matter the evidence, where the FDA would/could admit that it was a bad idea to vaccinate all of humanity with a novel technology and pathogen? They are too big to fail and must protect trust in the institution at all costs.
Curious to hear your, or any other TD doctors, point of view or experience regarding IgG4 antibodies. Is it something that is often monitored with lab work? Might it be a concern regarding cancer?
Also, what about the DNA contamination found in the covid vaccines. Might it be a concern as well? LINK
Finally, can anyone envision any scenario, no matter the evidence, where the FDA would/could admit that it was a bad idea to vaccinate all of humanity with a novel technology and pathogen? They are too big to fail and must protect trust in the institution at all costs.
Posted on 11/25/23 at 2:36 pm to ksayetiger
I knew this was coming. Cancer is all about finding it as quickly as possible and the lockdowns really harmed early detection. You can't feel a lump on telehealth
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News