- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Massie responds to Mike Johnson and Trump's "concerns" about Epstein Files bill
Posted on 11/19/25 at 8:29 am to deltaland
Posted on 11/19/25 at 8:29 am to deltaland
Why would he veto? Massie gave Bondi blanket power to redact and withhold whatever she sees fit. This whole thing was about giving Dems a talking point. Nothing is going to happen
2
Posted on 11/19/25 at 8:31 am to jbdawgs03
Ok.
Bondi can just be transparent and not redact anything…
Bondi can just be transparent and not redact anything…
Posted on 11/19/25 at 8:31 am to jbdawgs03
Why did team Trump fight the release so hard if it was going to be allowed to be redacted? That seems like the more retarded side
Posted on 11/19/25 at 8:37 am to SirWinston
I think Trump himself was pretty consistent he didn’t think anything would come from it and all the chatter was nothing more that a cheap headline grab (hoax). Massie winding you clowns up to get headlines only to give the intelligence community an off ramp in his bill is definitely more retarted and embarrassing for those who’ve been supporting him
Posted on 11/19/25 at 8:50 am to PorkSammich
quote:
you are going to blame Massie for the upcoming Trump administration’s redactions?
Ooof. Don’t need to read further to know your question will be ignored. The deflection should be typical.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 8:53 am to roadGator
Why did he include the off ramp in his seeking truth bill?
Posted on 11/19/25 at 8:54 am to jbdawgs03
How the frick would I know, weirdo?
Call his office.
As predicted, you ignored his question. Right on brand.
Call his office.
As predicted, you ignored his question. Right on brand.
This post was edited on 11/19/25 at 8:55 am
Posted on 11/19/25 at 8:57 am to roadGator
Guess it’s gotta be pretty embarrassing to be so completely manipulated by Massie like this. All that tough talk just pull the rug out at the very end. You clowns never learn
Posted on 11/19/25 at 8:58 am to jbdawgs03
quote:
Massie gave Bondi blanket power to redact and withhold whatever she sees fit.
Who does Bondi answer to?
Posted on 11/19/25 at 8:59 am to Flats
quote:
Who does Bondi answer to?
Posted on 11/19/25 at 9:01 am to jbdawgs03
That’s funny. Don’t ever answer the question. You’ll look like a bigger idiot.
I am not shocked you lack the ability to come up with any reasons for the language in the bill allowing some redactions.
You live in a metaphorical trailer park called on/off court.
You’ll assign believes. Make up falsehoods and toss around @username like a petulant child but never once answer who controls any allowed redactions. Doing so would force you to be smart and reasonable two things beyond your ability.
I am not shocked you lack the ability to come up with any reasons for the language in the bill allowing some redactions.
You live in a metaphorical trailer park called on/off court.
You’ll assign believes. Make up falsehoods and toss around @username like a petulant child but never once answer who controls any allowed redactions. Doing so would force you to be smart and reasonable two things beyond your ability.
This post was edited on 11/19/25 at 9:03 am
Posted on 11/19/25 at 9:02 am to roadGator
quote:
That’s funny. Don’t ever answer the question. You’ll look like a bigger idiot.
She answers to Trump. Who Massie has been ripping for weeks. Why would he turn around and give the guy hes been ripping all of the power?
Posted on 11/19/25 at 9:02 am to roadGator
quote:
Don’t need to read further to know your question will be ignored. The deflection should be typical.
When you think they couldn't promote rhetoric quite that dumb, they somehow still find a way to shock you.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 9:03 am to Flats
If Massie is about complete transparency why even give this off-ramp?
Posted on 11/19/25 at 9:03 am to BBONDS25
Exactly.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 9:04 am to jbdawgs03
quote:
If Massie is about complete transparency why even give this off-ramp?
Anyone with a basic understanding of release of criminal investigatory files knows these are standard. Typically its to permit compliance with laws protecting the victims of sexual assault.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 9:04 am to jbdawgs03
The president’s AG redacting anything from the files would almost certainly be acting on orders from the president.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 9:04 am to BBONDS25
quote:
Why would he turn around and give the guy hes been ripping all of the power?
You, on the other hand, are smart enough to come up with some valid reasons to allow for redactions.
What things do you think could be redacted?
I’m thinking some names or sources related to any possible ongoing investigations.
Some victims perhaps. Some politicians Trump admin may want to protect.
What else?
I will never understand any loyal Trump supporter complaining about ripping anyone.
It’s what Trump does but if he does it it’s fine. If he gets ripped then there’s complaints.
Was the comment about his new wife and him appropriate?
This post was edited on 11/19/25 at 9:07 am
Posted on 11/19/25 at 9:05 am to SlowFlowPro
The guy who pretends to be a lawyer on a message while holding the record for most posts in a day is critiquing others??? lol
Posted on 11/19/25 at 9:08 am to RelicBatches86
The Masshole Cult is riled up the last couple days.
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News