- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 3/23/24 at 3:47 pm to momentoftruth87
So, Fire Johnson.
Who do you replace him with?
Who do you replace him with?
Posted on 3/23/24 at 3:48 pm to RogerTheShrubber
How about Massie steps up since he has such a problem 
Posted on 3/23/24 at 3:51 pm to momentoftruth87
I dont think he does.
His tweet was neutral.
Giver me 5 replacement names that would be better (you cant)
His tweet was neutral.
Giver me 5 replacement names that would be better (you cant)
Posted on 3/23/24 at 3:51 pm to davyjones
quote:
That’s of course where my interpretation could be completely wrong,
Give it a week. Massie will back Johnson just like he backed McCarthy. Because there is the unknown. The unknown is "who is the replacement".
This post was edited on 3/23/24 at 3:52 pm
Posted on 3/23/24 at 3:54 pm to frogtown
quote:
"who is the replacement".
Right. You can only stack bodies so long before admitting the issue isnt solely on the position.
This post was edited on 3/23/24 at 3:55 pm
Posted on 3/23/24 at 3:55 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Who do you replace him with?
This house will never elect someone that will do the right things.
Johnson had a chance, but he cowered.
Posted on 3/23/24 at 4:01 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I dont think he does.
No shite. That isn’t what I said was happening. I’m suggesting he steps up since he always seems to think he does it right.
Posted on 3/23/24 at 4:03 pm to loogaroo
quote:
This house will never elect someone that will do the right things.
Because the system is broken. To do the "right things: means not getting re-elected.
Running on cutting government wins elections, but cutting government loses re-elections.
Posted on 3/23/24 at 4:12 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:
’m suggesting he steps up since he always seems to think he does it right.
What needs to happen is a leader like Javier Milei who can talk to people about economics, understands economics and can communicate in a way that adults can comprehend,
The population has no clue whey deficit spending is bad. shite, most of MAGA defended it over Trumps years.
Until the people find leadership that can tell them why deficits hurt, they'll vote for deficits and every leader will flail.
Posted on 3/23/24 at 4:13 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Imagine being so bad at math that you think this.
yep. Maybe Gaetz can team up with democrats again. Posted on 3/23/24 at 4:15 pm to frogtown
quote:Demonstrably worse. The majority is smaller. And spending is up $500 million over the deal that got McCarty run off. Great job Gaetz and Democrats!
That is right. Probably because he knew getting rid of McCarthy, at that time, would not improve things.
Posted on 3/23/24 at 4:17 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Been asking this question for months. “We’re here to destroy the GOP”. At the same time “why won’t the GOP help us?!”
Why dont yall go third party instead of hijacking the Republicans?
Posted on 3/23/24 at 4:19 pm to loogaroo
quote:Congress enjoys a 93+% re-election rate. And virtually no one wants spending cut. Blame congress all you want but voters are the real problem.
The voters will never elect someone that will do the right things.
This post was edited on 3/23/24 at 4:20 pm
Posted on 3/23/24 at 4:20 pm to Taxing Authority
Everything will always fail when folks’ expectations are set at “either satisfy every demand on my list or you’re out.” I’d love to know the exact point at which so many people, seemingly in unison, erased the notions of negotiation and compromise from their vocabulary and in their place adopted the notion of absolute demand of full satisfaction - or nothing.
Posted on 3/23/24 at 4:44 pm to loogaroo
quote:
Johnson could have brought a stripped down bill to keep the government funded.
And it wouldn’t have passed, as I also told you yesterday.
Posted on 3/23/24 at 4:46 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
And it wouldn’t have passed, as I also told you yesterday.
And the Dems would have owned shutting down the government, as I told you yesterday.
Posted on 3/23/24 at 4:47 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Congress enjoys a 93+% re-election rate. And virtually no one wants spending cut. Blame congress all you want but voters are the real problem.
Exactly. The torches and pitchfork crowd is stacking bodies, but stil losing.
No one will want the job. Its just a professional scapegoat.
Posted on 3/23/24 at 4:48 pm to loogaroo
quote:
And the Dems would have owned shutting down the government, as I told you yesterday.
You, momentoftruth, Marjorie Taylor-Green, and random Twitter blue checks are literally the only people on the planet who think that would have been the narrative.
Have you not been paying to attention for the past, I don’t know, four decades or so?
You’re living in a fantasy world where the media isn’t 99% Democrat.
Posted on 3/23/24 at 4:49 pm to loogaroo
quote:
And the Dems would have owned shutting down the government
Absolutely not
They would have spun it like they always do because we have no Republican leadership.
The party is just adrift at the whim of voters who say one thing, and do the other.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News