- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Marjorie Taylor Greene says they can control the weather
Posted on 10/8/24 at 8:07 am to Seldom Seen
Posted on 10/8/24 at 8:07 am to Seldom Seen
Any of you dumbasses that think cloud seeding is unfounded only have to Google search it and read.
Stop being dense for Christ's sake.
Stop being dense for Christ's sake.
Posted on 10/8/24 at 8:40 am to Lizardman2
Cloud seeding is a long way off from creating & controlling hurricanes 
Posted on 10/8/24 at 8:44 am to Mickey Goldmill
Keep believing that shite dude
Posted on 10/8/24 at 8:52 am to Seldom Seen
quote:
United Nations (UN) treaties prohibit using weather modification to kill or maim people. Modifying weather to cause injury or death is outlawed.
Defense.Gov
Just sayin
Posted on 10/8/24 at 9:22 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Cloud seeding is a long way off from creating & controlling hurricanes
"Covid wasn't created in a lab as a bioweapon, that's just ridiculous. It was likely formed when a webbed footed pangolin humped a Malaysian long winged bat that was then eaten by a fish and ended up in a Chinese Wet market" the left
Posted on 10/8/24 at 9:22 am to Gifman
quote:
What she's saying is technically true.
I think "influence" is a lot more accurate than control, but even if what she said is technically accurate the context makes it very, very suspect. She's trying to imply something about Helene and everybody knows it.
A lot of what Tim Walz said about his military service was technically accurate, but we all know what he was trying to do.
Posted on 10/8/24 at 9:37 am to Statestreet
quote:
"Covid wasn't created in a lab as a bioweapon, that's just ridiculous. It was likely formed when a webbed footed pangolin humped a Malaysian long winged bat that was then eaten by a fish and ended up in a Chinese Wet market" the left
Feel better?
Posted on 10/8/24 at 10:25 am to Mickey Goldmill
You're such a fool.
Posted on 10/8/24 at 10:30 am to Flats
Oopsie...
Project Cirrus was the first attempt to modify a hurricane in 1947.
An airplane flew along the “rainbands” of a hurricane, and dropped 80 pounds (36 kilograms) of crushed dry ice into the clouds in an attempt to redirect a storm off the coast of Florida, only to artificially redirect it to demolish parts of Georgia.
While there is little public proof that a hurricane can be “created”, Project Cirrus proved that a hurricane can be “redirected”.

Project Cirrus was the first attempt to modify a hurricane in 1947.
An airplane flew along the “rainbands” of a hurricane, and dropped 80 pounds (36 kilograms) of crushed dry ice into the clouds in an attempt to redirect a storm off the coast of Florida, only to artificially redirect it to demolish parts of Georgia.
While there is little public proof that a hurricane can be “created”, Project Cirrus proved that a hurricane can be “redirected”.

Posted on 10/8/24 at 10:42 am to LookSquirrel
You seriously think 180 pounds of dry ice redirected a hurricane?
Posted on 10/8/24 at 10:48 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
You seriously think 180 pounds of dry ice redirected a hurricane?
I get that not everybody takes thermodynamics in school, but damn.
Posted on 10/8/24 at 10:57 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
This part of the GP article is definitely misleading/ disingenuous:
They link to this article Earth magazine: Benchmarks: October 13, 1947: A disaster with Project Cirrusand claim it provides proof that Project Cirrus was the cause of the storms redirection.
The article actually itself stated that people assumed it had, whereas research conducted since has proved undoubtedly that it wasn’t the cause of the change in direction:
No link provided to Langmuir’s arguments.
Of course that was almost 80 years ago and the other info re China weaponizing it and the UN outlawing it would seem to indicate that advancements have been made in this field since then.
quote:
While there is little public proof that a hurricane can be “created”, Project Cirrus proved that a hurricane can be “redirected”.
. . .
Nobel Prize winning Scientist Irving Langmuir argued that Project Cirrus’s cloud seeding had caused the storm’s change in direction.
They link to this article Earth magazine: Benchmarks: October 13, 1947: A disaster with Project Cirrusand claim it provides proof that Project Cirrus was the cause of the storms redirection.
The article actually itself stated that people assumed it had, whereas research conducted since has proved undoubtedly that it wasn’t the cause of the change in direction:
quote:
What was conclusive, however, was that the storm had taken a sudden westward turn and made landfall just outside of Savannah, Ga.
To the average person, it looked like Project Cirrus was to blame. Time magazine reported, “In Savannah last week, Southern blood bubbled toward the boiling point. A Miami weatherman had hinted that last month’s disastrous hurricane might have been not an act of God, but just a low Yankee trick.” Fearing lawsuits, GE pulled its support of the project. But before any legal actions could be carried out, other meteorologists pointed out that previous hurricanes had taken nearly identical paths.
Later investigations that showed the storm had begun its westward turn before the cloud seeding took place fully cleared Project Cirrus of any liability. In fact, recent studies on the amount of power unleashed by a hurricane make the attempt to modify one with only 80 kilograms of dry ice appear laughable. Bob Sheets, former director of the National Hurricane Center in Miami, wrote in his book “Hurricane Watch” that the heat energy a hurricane releases each day can be compared to the energy released by 400 20-megaton hydrogen bombs. However, such research is only a few years old, so it could not be used in defense of the failed attempt by Project Cirrus.
No link provided to Langmuir’s arguments.
Of course that was almost 80 years ago and the other info re China weaponizing it and the UN outlawing it would seem to indicate that advancements have been made in this field since then.
This post was edited on 10/8/24 at 11:00 am
Posted on 10/8/24 at 10:59 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
You seriously think 180 pounds of dry ice redirected a hurricane?
It isn't about "believing" it, or not. More about "knowing" there is a history that suggests it's very possible/
quote:
Project Cirrus was the first attempt to modify a hurricane. It was a collaboration of the General Electric Corporation, the US Army Signal Corps, the Office of Naval Research, and the US Air Force.
After several preparations, and initial skepticism by government scientists, the first attempt to modify a hurricane began on October 13, 1947 on a hurricane that was heading west to east and out to sea. An airplane flew along the rainbands of the hurricane, and dropped nearly 80 pounds (36 kilograms) of crushed dry ice into the clouds.
The crew reported “Pronounced modification of the cloud deck seeded”. It is not known if that was due to the seeding. Next, the hurricane changed direction and made landfall near Savannah, Georgia. The public blamed the seeding, and Irving Langmuir claimed that the reversal had been caused by human intervention.
Project Cirrus Crew
The Blackvault
Posted on 10/8/24 at 12:35 pm to Kjnstkmn
quote:
They link to this article Earth magazine: Benchmarks: October 13, 1947: A disaster with Project Cirrusand claim it provides proof that Project Cirrus was the cause of the storms redirection.
The article actually itself stated that people assumed it had, whereas research conducted since has proved undoubtedly that it wasn’t the cause of the change in direction:
That is the sort of thing Gateway Pundit always does. They see something conflicting with their narrative and ignore it all the while using other pieces of the same source to accomplish their goal.
The technology was so bad back then, they had no idea what was typical behavior of hurricanes so if they changed after dropping dry ice in it, they thought it was them altering things rather than it being something hurricanes typically do on their own.
We see it all the time today. Hurricanes can lose their eyewall and reform a new one. Back then, they thought it was the cloud seeding doing that.
Posted on 10/8/24 at 12:42 pm to LookSquirrel
quote:
An airplane flew along the “rainbands” of a hurricane, and dropped 80 pounds (36 kilograms) of crushed dry ice into the clouds in an attempt to redirect a storm off the coast of Florida, only to artificially redirect it to demolish parts of Georgia.
Posted on 10/8/24 at 12:47 pm to LookSquirrel
Apparently HealthRanger is a believer:
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 10/8/24 at 12:49 pm to LookSquirrel
quote:
More about "knowing" there is a history that suggests it's very possible/
The history suggests no such thing. All the history tells you is that someone attempted it. People attempted alchemy for centuries.
Posted on 10/8/24 at 1:03 pm to Flats
quote:
People attempted alchemy for centuries.
With any success?
I know I should just let this thread die because we will be on to Milton soon enough. And something else after that.
This genie is not going back into that cloudy bottle.
Popular
Back to top


1





