Started By
Message
locked post

MAGA has released a new ad for Dems regarding illegal immigration: "Complicit"

Posted on 1/21/18 at 9:42 am
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51798 posts
Posted on 1/21/18 at 9:42 am
LINK (youtube)


As they stand so brave championing for a better life for these downtrodden souls, Trump kicks them in the nuts with this.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
73559 posts
Posted on 1/21/18 at 9:43 am to
Yeah hes trapped them and now hes full pressing
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
78497 posts
Posted on 1/21/18 at 9:44 am to
Complicit . The key point .
Posted by Plx1776
Member since Oct 2017
16209 posts
Posted on 1/21/18 at 9:45 am to
That was glorious.

Posted by MastrShake
SoCal
Member since Nov 2008
7281 posts
Posted on 1/21/18 at 10:40 am to
this board:

"the left has to resort to fear-mongering because its all they have."

"this ad was awesome, and totally on point."
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 1/21/18 at 10:45 am to
quote:

"this ad was awesome, and totally on point."



The leftists in California have Kate Steinle's blood on their hands. That a-hole would not have been here of not for them, ergo, they are a cause of her murder.

Take your false equivalence and shove it up your arse.
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
78497 posts
Posted on 1/21/18 at 10:45 am to
That sounds like the kind of obfuscation and relativism that a complicit person would engage in .
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 1/21/18 at 10:50 am to
quote:

this board:

"the left has to resort to fear-mongering because its all they have."

"this ad was awesome, and totally on point."


What do you claim is "fear mongering"?
Posted by Deuces
The bottom
Member since Nov 2011
12375 posts
Posted on 1/21/18 at 10:50 am to
quote:

"The left has to resort to fear-mongering because its all they have."


There's a difference between fear mongering and the truth. Your party just chose to take the side of 800,000 illegal immigrants over 320+ million Americans and our military. We have no clue who comes in past our borders, and it's ya'lls fault directly.
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
78497 posts
Posted on 1/21/18 at 10:54 am to
Progressives are not and have never been concerned with policy outcome. They are interested in projecting their moral vanity into the culture. This has never been about immigration policy . It’s about Progressive virtue- signaling.
Posted by MastrShake
SoCal
Member since Nov 2008
7281 posts
Posted on 1/21/18 at 11:06 am to
quote:

The leftists in California have Kate Steinle's blood on their hands. That a-hole would not have been here of not for them, ergo, they are a cause of her murder.
oh is that how this works?

Stephen Paddock bought 88 guns in a year, then locked himself in a room with 23 rifles including four DDM4 rifles, three FN-15 rifles, one AR-15 rifle, one .308-caliber AR-10, one AK-47, and at least one made-to-order LMT rifle, then opened fire on a crowd, killing 58 people and wounding 546 others.

which side was "complicit" in that? its certainly not the left allowing this, so is the blood of those 58 people on the hands of the right, or does this blame thing only work that way when you decide it should?
Posted by Erin Go Bragh
Beyond the Pale
Member since Dec 2007
14916 posts
Posted on 1/21/18 at 11:10 am to
Wow, comparing Paddock's actions to Kate Steinle's killer is a stretch of Gumby proportions.
Posted by mwade91383
Washington DC
Member since Mar 2010
5637 posts
Posted on 1/21/18 at 11:21 am to
Stop it. You know exactly what he’s talking about.
Posted by MastrShake
SoCal
Member since Nov 2008
7281 posts
Posted on 1/21/18 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

Wow, comparing Paddock's actions to Kate Steinle's killer is a stretch of Gumby proportions.
hahaha, holy christ. its the exact same thing, its saying a party is directly responsible for anything bad that comes from legislation it supports.

god damn, this place is the definitive echo chamber of idiots. by all means keep lecturing my side about intellectual honesty.
Posted by Erin Go Bragh
Beyond the Pale
Member since Dec 2007
14916 posts
Posted on 1/21/18 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

hahaha, holy christ. its the exact same thing,

What a dumbass reply. Think about what you're saying, and how these two events are in no way comparable, for more than a nanosecond and maybe that 5 watt lightbulb will go off over your head.

Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
30089 posts
Posted on 1/21/18 at 1:06 pm to


Stephen Paddock bought 88 guns in a year, then locked himself in a room with 23 rifles including four DDM4 rifles, three FN-15 rifles, one AR-15 rifle, one .308-caliber AR-10, one AK-47, and at least one made-to-order LMT rifle, then opened fire on a crowd, killing 58 people and wounding 546 others.




Unless he obtained those weapons illegally, Paddock was well within his constitutional rights to possess them. His act of murder was illegal, not the gun ownership.
The mere act of entering this country illegaly is a criminal act. You have an entire political party encouraging and assisting criminal behavior for their own selfish gain.
I'm sure you can see the difference, but you're just too full of shite to acknowledge it.
Posted by MastrShake
SoCal
Member since Nov 2008
7281 posts
Posted on 1/21/18 at 1:16 pm to
explain how its different then. go ahead and dance around in a little intellectual circle. the ad flat out says the left is responsible for a murder because of their policies.

the policies and legislation of the right allowed paddock to stockpile an armory which he then used to set up a snipers nest and open fire on a crowd, shooting 604 people in a matter of minutes, killing 58.

if the first thing is true, and according to trump it is, the ad simply says it in no uncertain terms, then the second thing is also true. theres no getting around this.

Posted by Erin Go Bragh
Beyond the Pale
Member since Dec 2007
14916 posts
Posted on 1/21/18 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

explain how its different then.


For starters one involves an illegal action. The other doesn't.

Unless your contention is that the GOP supported murder then you're way off base with your posts.
Posted by MastrShake
SoCal
Member since Nov 2008
7281 posts
Posted on 1/21/18 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

Unless he obtained those weapons illegally, Paddock was well within his constitutional rights to possess them.
yes. obviously. this is my point entirely. its the right who keeps that shite legal. if you support that, according to trumps ad, then you are complicit in the murder of those 58 people.

are you complicit in that, yes or no?

i would say you arent, because im not a fricking simpleton who can only process 30 second videos set to ominous music with "evil" literally stamped across the screen, but trump disagrees, he says you are.
Posted by Erin Go Bragh
Beyond the Pale
Member since Dec 2007
14916 posts
Posted on 1/21/18 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

its the right who keeps that shite legal

It's the constitution that allows for gun ownership.

Might want to get after those founding fathers.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram