- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Live: Supreme Court hears Trump bid to limit birthright citizenship
Posted on 4/1/26 at 2:15 pm to meansonny
Posted on 4/1/26 at 2:15 pm to meansonny
quote:
That's the biggest challenge to the amendment itself.
How does one enforce it, practically.
How many babies are born outside of hospitals in the US? Maybe like 0.1%? 0.001%?
1
Posted on 4/1/26 at 2:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
That's the biggest challenge to the amendment itself.
How does one enforce it, practically.
How many babies are born outside of hospitals in the US? Maybe like 0.1%? 0.001%?
RealID would go a long way to documenting this.
But what do you do when someone is rushed to a hospital without a driver's license or state ID? Refuse admittance?
Posted on 4/1/26 at 2:25 pm to Hangit
quote:
If it turns out that there was massive voter fraud and Brandon's presidency was illegal, does Jumanji Jackson Browne get a ticket for the next Greyhound home?
We can only hope that is the case, but we all know how our federal government is self-serving and never does a d***ed thing when it comes to actually addressing real, legitimate, issues that affect the sovereignty of our country.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 2:28 pm to meansonny
quote:
RealID would go a long way to documenting this.
But what do you do when someone is rushed to a hospital without a driver's license or state ID? Refuse admittance?
Aren't we talking about determining that the baby was born within the US?
If not, what was your prior post referencing?
Posted on 4/1/26 at 2:34 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Aren't we talking about determining that the baby was born within the US?
If not, what was your prior post referencing?
We are talking about a baby being born in the US.
The 14th amendment references Legal Jurisdiction of the parents for citizenship.
The biggest challenge to "legal jurisdiction" being applicable is proving the parents are here legally when a baby is born.
RealID does that (you need social security card and birth certificate or passport to get RealID).
There are 19 states who issue Drivers licenses without verifying birth certificates/passports and social security cards.
And then there are those who do not drive or fly or vote.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 4:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:No.
You're pivoting.
State views of domicile have no more relevance in this discussion than do states' predilection for or against against illegal immigration.
Regarding domicile, the classic domicile test asks whether someone intends/expects to remain indefinitely. An illegal knows their stay is contingent on not being caught. That is a conditional, not an indefinite presence. An illegal's presence/domicile here is precarious at best. It could be ripped away at any moment by legal forces outside his/her control. I can buy a powerball ticket intending to win. That does not change the nature of the "investment."
Page 6 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News