- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Let's Talk Common Core
Posted on 12/3/14 at 2:44 pm to Jax-Tiger
Posted on 12/3/14 at 2:44 pm to Jax-Tiger
I have a real concern about any new standard or teaching methodology being considered or adopted. The Koreans scored #1 in math. What is the curriculum and teaching methodology they use? Has common core ever been tested to show that the children learn at a greater proficiency? Do nations scoring higher than our children use this kind of system?
Posted on 12/3/14 at 2:51 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:
Teaching our children how to THINK should be a goal of every person.
But you don't learn theory first. You learn facts first. Theory last.
Posted on 12/3/14 at 3:02 pm to Jax-Tiger
quote:
I dislike it because it's mandated at a federal level.
No it is not.
Posted on 12/3/14 at 3:49 pm to anc
Not clear where you get your conclusion that 'the majority can't do the math' but that's not the case. I have friends who are doctors and PhDs in math for whom the way they are teaching math under CC makes no sense whatsoever. All of a sudden, math has become a narrative, not an exact science. And the way it's been taught for generations is not longer correct. Example: a friend's son was asked how 1/2 is similar to 4/8. He very wisely answered that 1 is half of two and 4 is half of 8. He was marked wrong because 'that's not the way it was taught in class.' Brilliant teaching, not! His parents have a PhD in Physics and a Master's in Physics. He's now being homeschooled. Common Core has been great for boosting homeschooling ranks.
Posted on 12/3/14 at 4:33 pm to SpidermanTUba
quote:
quote:
I dislike it because it's mandated at a federal level.
No it is not.
You're right. It's not mandated. I worded that wrong. The federal government does use our tax dollars as an incentive for states to adopt CC.
The standards are set at a national level. I am concerned that the standards will be politicized. Does anybody have any doubt that this will happen? First, states with higher African-American populations will come out and say the standards discriminate. Then Hispanics will follow suit. The the global warming crowd will jump in and say that 110% of all scientists agree that global warming propoganda should be included in the standards. The evangelicals will want evolution removed from the standards, etc...
I predict that national elections will be won/lost over this.
I don't have anything against standards. I just don't think that one set of national standards is the way to go. This is the camel's nose under the tent.
Posted on 12/3/14 at 4:35 pm to anc
Almost every common core test I've seen is an improvement over the rote sludge I was getting in grade school.
I'm like 90% sure the reaction to common core is because it has the tribal stopword "common" in the name.
I'm like 90% sure the reaction to common core is because it has the tribal stopword "common" in the name.
This post was edited on 12/3/14 at 4:37 pm
Posted on 12/3/14 at 4:45 pm to Iosh
quote:
I'm like 90% sure the reaction to common core is because it has the tribal stopword "common" in the name.
I never even thought of that.
The devil always has what appears to be a good deal for you when he's negotiating for your soul...
Posted on 12/3/14 at 5:29 pm to anc
I think the ELA standards are fine in and of themselves. The biggest letdown to me is that CC misled with its supposed intent to increase depth by reducing breadth. They're just as cumbersome as the old Framework and allow little time for depth.
I also don't get how CC is supposed to eliminate "teaching to the test." There is a test. And as teachers, administrators, and educational companies become more familiar with it, all constituents will be playing the game as usual.
I also don't get how CC is supposed to eliminate "teaching to the test." There is a test. And as teachers, administrators, and educational companies become more familiar with it, all constituents will be playing the game as usual.
Posted on 12/3/14 at 5:50 pm to anc
My problem with Common Core doesn't center on the focus an analysis and skill-building; it's that a lot of the approved material is garbage.
Posted on 12/3/14 at 6:07 pm to anc
One of the main issues is the blanket introductions. Kids in 9th Grade for example are suddenly opened up to this new rigor that has been absent all their school career. We can't expect them to be successful.
Common core rigor and standards should have started 100% implementation from the beginning so that kids can be developed and cultivated to expect and succeed with it. A relative easing or mixing of certain aspects for all other kids until after 12 years you have a fully integrated system with fully developed children and the system is firmly in place.
Education changes every 3-5 yrs because they think they can just drop blanket changes, doesn't work like that.
Common core rigor and standards should have started 100% implementation from the beginning so that kids can be developed and cultivated to expect and succeed with it. A relative easing or mixing of certain aspects for all other kids until after 12 years you have a fully integrated system with fully developed children and the system is firmly in place.
Education changes every 3-5 yrs because they think they can just drop blanket changes, doesn't work like that.
Posted on 12/3/14 at 6:22 pm to WalkingTurtles
quote:
One of the main issues is the blanket introductions. Kids in 9th Grade for example are suddenly opened up to this new rigor that has been absent all their school career. We can't expect them to be successful. Common core rigor and standards should have started 100% implementation from the beginning so that kids can be developed and cultivated to expect and succeed with it. A relative easing or mixing of certain aspects for all other kids until after 12 years you have a fully integrated system with fully developed children and the system is firmly in place. Education changes every 3-5 yrs because they think they can just drop blanket changes, doesn't work like that.
Agree 100%. I am a 5th grade teacher. Last year when we suddenly implemented the new standards, some of the topics I used to cover in 5th grade math were suddenly in the 4th grade curriculum. I had a curriculum to teach them that built upon those topics but they hadn't learned them yet. I had to teach them 4th grade standards in order to even begin my 5th grade ones...they never caught up....how could they? It should have been phased in.
You will hear that the CC was brought into being by a consortium of governors. But the truth is it was written nearly completely by one person, David Coleman. Do some research on this dude and some of you may be frightened. He is now the president of the ETS and is overhauling the SAT to match the Common Core.
I think some of the standards are good in theory, but I don't like how quickly it was rolled out. We are finding MANY MANY mistakes in our expensive new Math program, and the practice test we were promised long ago still isn't ready. Our first test is in March. It isn't going to be pretty.
I've been a teacher for many years and even though we always had a test, I never considered my approach "teaching to the test". Now, we are all totally teaching to the test. There is very little time or appreciation for creativity and unlike what we all learned in school for individual differences, they ALL have to pass the same test regardless of their ability, even those who have an IEP. And my evaluation and pay raise depends on these scores, yeah that is fair. Try giving Ford parts to a Mercedes factory and expecting them to turn out a Mercedes. Kids are humans and have all types of family and emotional issues that can prevent them from learning to their best ability. But we've still got to crack that whip and keep moving. The feds are trying to suck the joy out of learning and I fear they will succeed.
Posted on 12/3/14 at 6:40 pm to skeeter531
Why are they teaching our kids that blue is blue and not wasting our kids time with some long drawn out explanation as to why blue is blue for their homework?
Posted on 12/3/14 at 6:43 pm to ell_13
quote:
I got an A
I could have gotten a hundred but I made a stupid mistake on the muffin question.
Posted on 12/3/14 at 6:48 pm to catholictigerfan
isn't the idea behind common core to find out why it is that way, on top of knowing how to do it?
For whatever reason they have a problem with memorization techniques
5+6 = 11
5+7 = 12
5+8 = 13
5+9 = 14
6+6 = 12
6+7 = 13
6+8 = 14
6+9 = 15
7+4 = 11
7+7 = 14
etc.
instead they have to do this to get the answer correct.
6+7, 6+ 4 = 10 7-4 = 3 10+3 = 13 (note I do sometimes do that in my head, but i still usually am able to do basic arithmetic in my head pretty quickly.)
Memorizing your single digits addition tables, makes a problem like this not so difficult to solve
_456467
+864385
= 1,320,852
The apparent common core way to solve that is pretty complicated. Note: I realize most people would do this with a calculator.
For whatever reason they have a problem with memorization techniques
5+6 = 11
5+7 = 12
5+8 = 13
5+9 = 14
6+6 = 12
6+7 = 13
6+8 = 14
6+9 = 15
7+4 = 11
7+7 = 14
etc.
instead they have to do this to get the answer correct.
6+7, 6+ 4 = 10 7-4 = 3 10+3 = 13 (note I do sometimes do that in my head, but i still usually am able to do basic arithmetic in my head pretty quickly.)
Memorizing your single digits addition tables, makes a problem like this not so difficult to solve
_456467
+864385
= 1,320,852
The apparent common core way to solve that is pretty complicated. Note: I realize most people would do this with a calculator.
Posted on 12/3/14 at 6:59 pm to anc
quote:
We've gotten a long way from this sort of rigor. Common Core is actually doing one thing right - its teaching kids how to think rather than what to think. Its frustrating to adults because most of them learned how to memorize a test.
when it comes to Math, it really doesn't matter how to think it really is what to think.
If you memorize division multiplication subtraction and addition tables, doing simple math which we have taught for a long time, is efficient and easy to do. I rarely have to do math now of days, I usually just pull out a phone and plug it in my phone. But when it comes down to it I remember how to do it.
here are some simple but long math problems. Don't pull out a calculator, do it on paper. Do it the old fashion way, than do it the common core way. Tell me which is faster.
537 X 534
782 / 28
523562 + 678659
25214 - 14253
In the real world, we usually do math by calculators I realize that but if you ever have to do it by hand the quicker the better. The world demands results not knowing how.
Common core math sucks because it forces you to do a lengthy process that can be done just as well quicker.
Posted on 12/3/14 at 7:27 pm to Jax-Tiger
How can you politicize math?? English, maybe you involve politics by teaching certain writers, but it's basically above politics as well.
Now if we try to get national standards in science and history, we will need to pay attention.
Now if we try to get national standards in science and history, we will need to pay attention.
Posted on 12/3/14 at 7:29 pm to conservativewifeymom
Sounds like the issue isn't CC it's the crappy teacher.
Posted on 12/3/14 at 7:31 pm to the808bass
Learning facts before theory has given us a group of 20-somethings that can spit out facts like a boss but have no idea how or when to apply those facts and no idea how to think critically. The only way they succeed is if life is laid out like a textbook, which doesn't happen.
Posted on 12/3/14 at 8:14 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
Learning facts before theory has given us a group of 20-somethings that can spit out facts like a boss but have no idea how or when to apply those facts and no idea how to think critically. The only way they succeed is if life is laid out like a textbook, which doesn't happen.
respectfully--you are wrong, sir! This generation does not know their basic math facts because memorizing them is not stressed. Concepts are stressed. We have a generation of kindergartners through 4th graders who can tell you what a trapezoid is, but they can NOT tell you what 7 + 6 is.
Posted on 12/3/14 at 8:44 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
Learning facts before theory has given us a group of 20-somethings that can spit out facts like a boss but have no idea how or when to apply those facts and no idea how to think critically. The only way they succeed is if life is laid out like a textbook, which doesn't happen.
You have to make a distinction between basic fundamental factual systems and systems that involve theories. Math is factual. There is no theory in math, no matter what the laws of physics are 1+1 will always equal 2, 5 times 4 will always equal 20. Math is such a fundamental concept that not even the laws of physics can change how they operate. Math is based on logical systems, that is why laws of physics don't change math.
So why should we care about theories of math, there is no such thing as theory in math.
For Math one thing matters, knowing what certain equations put out when computed. A basic math problem like 241 + 236, shouldn't take but 10 to 20 seconds on a piece of paper or even in your head. The common core way would take a minuet with this problem.
My main problem at-least with common core math, is that it tries to complicate something that is simple. Maybe it is easier to learn for kids who haven't learned it, but for kids who know how to do these things it is stupid.
Math should be about figuring out how to solve equations as quick as you can with high accuracy if not 100% accuracy. anything that slows you down I would think is destructive to application in the real world.
One simple example.
I know a recipe calls for 1 1/3 cups of flour. I want to 5X that recipe, I want a method that either I can do quickly on paper or in my head quick. Not something that I have to draw a box, than divide into boxes than add it up. It wastes time compared to doing it on paper.
Note it is pretty easy to do this on paper
3X1 + 1 4/3 * 5/1 20/3 = 6 2/3. You would need 6 and 2 thirds flower to make 5 batches of that recipe. I did that pretty quickly in my head. I'm pretty sure common core gets you to draw a box and figure it out that way.
This post was edited on 12/3/14 at 8:50 pm
Popular
Back to top


0






