Started By
Message

re: Let's talk about some marital privilege and class signaling

Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:14 pm to
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49091 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:14 pm to
quote:

On one hand I have little sympathy. Black women are obese and extremely loud. OTOH, I've known thin, quiet, intelligent black women who didn't marry because of the field they have to work with. As they explained to me:
"If you're looking for a black male who has not been in jail, has a college degree, has no drug issues, and doesn't prefer white women... then you're dealing with a very small group."


I have pretty much zero sympathy for adults who face hardship due to their decisions. I will say that I feel really bad for intelligent, responsible black folks though. More than any other group, they have the biggest uphill battle.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466333 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:16 pm to
quote:

OTOH, I've known thin, quiet, intelligent black women who didn't marry because of the field they have to work with.

oh in terms of our society, black women get the short end of the stick all around

they're seen as the ugliest subset of women (See: OK Cupid data)

they have the least prospects within their own race, especially outside of the upper class. it gets exponentially worse as we go down

many are raised in an absolutely toxic culture

quote:

"If you're looking for a black male who has not been in jail, has a college degree, has no drug issues, and doesn't prefer white women... then you're dealing with a very small group."

there was a story a few years ago out of ATL about this

there was a culture of boyfriend sharing, b/c there are so few suitable black men to date (you forgot to add in HIV/AIDS)
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466333 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

because you're talking about people and not science experiments

and people respond to criticism and consequences

quote:

In a world where females are gaining income and power, you won't win points with them by suggesting we go back to 1950s norms where they submit to a often less high value man just for the sake of being married

re-read OP

THESE WOMEN ARE GETTING MARRIED

it's the poor women who don't have any real income or power who aren't, and who are having kids they doom to poverty in the process
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466333 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

The problem is the marketing of privilege by the left.

they can't close Pandora's Box, at this point
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:18 pm to
They can definitely improve the marketing of privilege, now will they. Who knows?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466333 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

I will say that I feel really bad for intelligent, responsible black folks though. More than any other group, they have the biggest uphill battle.

black, educated women have the literal shite end of the stick
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49091 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

because you're talking about people and not science experiments


Results are results. Just because humans are being studied doesn't mean they are not devastating consequences for certain behaviors.


quote:

In a world where females are gaining income and power, you won't win points with them by suggesting we go back to 1950s norms where they submit to a often less high value man just for the sake of being married


It's actually the opposite. The article clearly references the education level of both parents. And, regardless of education levels, we know there are macrolevel negative consequences for childbirth outside of marriage. Women's advancement in society doesn't change this fact; ignoring it isn't going to make it go away.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466333 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

They can definitely improve the marketing of privilege,

i don't know if they can within the paradigm of privilege and marginalization they have based their entire ideology on
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11516 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

i mean i somewhat get it. the progs of any intelligence who do this know they are much more advanced than their "lessers" they're discussing. they feel bad for "being mean" to them, because the lower class life is so shitty. also i believe there is a ton of elitism, i.e., "they will never be able to comprehend these concepts on their own" it's this weird merging of guilt and elitism without the strength to state reality


I don't see this as being necessarily elitist. I see it as being intellectually modest.

The implicit assumption in social science research is that social phenomena like marriage are are at least partially rational acts. Sociologists that study marriage or poverty are social scientists. They come at these issues with hypotheses and try to test them as best they can. It doesn't help one understanding a phenomenon by pre-judging it.
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49091 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

They can definitely improve the marketing of privilege, now will they. Who knows?


They can start by stopping falsely labeling it "privilege."
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466333 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

They can start by stopping falsely labeling it "privilege."

yeah

it's one thing when it's an inherent quality (ie, white or male privilege) that may have some validity (at least historically)

it's a completely different thing when we're talking about decisions and behaviors
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

i don't know if they can within the paradigm of privilege and marginalization they have based their entire ideology on


I think there are some of the left that overzealous of privilege, and try to use it as a stick in conversations. They are unlikely to change.

But it could be re-marketed pretty easily. Now I don't think it will be, but it could and should be.

It is a very simple concept, that is very true. I mean, who really thinks that a poor black male kid living with non-nuclear family has the same opportunity as that of an upper-class white kid?
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

it's a completely different thing when we're talking about decisions and behaviors


nonsense! I can't control my parent's decisions, I am just the by-product of them.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466333 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

I mean, who really thinks that a poor black male kid living with non-nuclear family has the same opportunity as that of an upper-class white kid?

how about we label the negative behaviors that lead to negative outcomes as disadvantages?

because that would (a) be considered mean/cruel and (b) lead to a discussion about segregating class and behaviors that progs avoid

that's why they attack the path that leads to advantage and that's why this PR shift can't work. you cannot promote marginalization and the victim complex of the modern progressive ideology while labeling the behaviors that lead to this status as negative. in terms of ideology it's an attack within itself
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466333 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

I can't control my parent's decisions, I am just the by-product of them.

the issue is defending your parents' decisions as good (when they're terrible) and telling you that repeating this behavioral pattern is OK
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

where it's clear that we know which avenue is superior and for whatever reason, we create a negative connotation around the behavior while defending those who reject the more optimal set of decisions.
I'm sorry are you saying there's a stigma against married people?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466333 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

I'm sorry are you saying there's a stigma against married people?

for many progs, yes (See this thread for one example. i believe my quoted response is early on page 2)

but my comment was about the use of privilege (or similar terminologies), which has negative connotation
This post was edited on 6/6/17 at 4:36 pm
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
125514 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

The cause of their concern: A growing gap in marriage is helping to drive economic inequality in the U.S.


Add in the fact that college educated people are generally self-segregating to marry other college educated people and you're accelerating the class divide at warp speed. Townies need not apply.
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

for many progs
Okay so this is another thread where you beat the shite out of a straw man labeled PROG. Carry on.
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49091 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

the issue is defending your parents' decisions as good (when they're terrible) and telling you that repeating this behavioral pattern is OK


And that the only reason you're in your position and the upper class is in their's is because of factors completely out of either of your control.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram