- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Letlow Putting Louisiana on the Map
Posted on 5/17/26 at 9:53 am to loogaroo
Posted on 5/17/26 at 9:53 am to loogaroo
I think any wind can blow Letlow.
She will become whatever she has to be once Trump and Landry are gone.
Her new fiancé is a lobbyist for carbon sequestration. The biggest scam out there.
I find it a little weird she is engaged only two years after her husband died. Especially with little kids.
She will become whatever she has to be once Trump and Landry are gone.
Her new fiancé is a lobbyist for carbon sequestration. The biggest scam out there.
I find it a little weird she is engaged only two years after her husband died. Especially with little kids.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 10:21 am to loogaroo
Imagine being this emotionally invested in a widow remarrying five years after her husband died while also being too stupid to get the timeline right.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 10:41 am to ataraxia
quote:
scrapping the bottom
A few more idiotic posts like this might help dial us in on which shitty poster is using this alter.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 10:44 am to Icansee4miles
I fixed the typo for you. Now on to more concerning matters…
Are you still imagining Cassidy in a dress? Genuinely deranged mental imagery. You’re never beating the allegations, pal.
Are you still imagining Cassidy in a dress? Genuinely deranged mental imagery. You’re never beating the allegations, pal.
This post was edited on 5/17/26 at 10:47 am
Posted on 5/17/26 at 10:47 am to ataraxia
You’re too dim of a bulb to waste time with.
So which shite poster are you?
So which shite poster are you?
Posted on 5/17/26 at 10:47 am to Icansee4miles
Ataraxia.
So caught up on imaging old men in dresses you forgot to read?
So caught up on imaging old men in dresses you forgot to read?
Posted on 5/17/26 at 10:49 am to ataraxia
quote:
Imagine being this emotionally invested in a widow remarrying five years after her husband died while also being too stupid to get the timeline right.
.
5 years is still a little strange with little kids, but ok.
Dispute the rest of my post
Posted on 5/17/26 at 10:55 am to loogaroo
You completely fabricated the timeline so you could posture about a widow’s personal life, got publicly corrected, and are now desperately trying to retrofit your original creepy fixation into something that sounds less unhinged.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 10:59 am to ataraxia
quote:
desperately trying to retrofit your original creepy fixation into something that sounds less unhinged.
What’s desperate about it? Dispute the rest of my post.
You are the one unhinged on here trolling anyone that exposes who Letlow really is and why she is being used.
You can’t dispute it so…

Posted on 5/17/26 at 11:34 am to loogaroo
The irony of posting a “you big mad” meme in the middle of a paranoid political rant about hidden manipulation is almost performance art.
I think enough of North BR “aesthetics” have infected peoples daily lives enough without that slop by the way. You’re in the wrong part of the internet, “homeboy”.
I think enough of North BR “aesthetics” have infected peoples daily lives enough without that slop by the way. You’re in the wrong part of the internet, “homeboy”.
This post was edited on 5/17/26 at 11:50 am
Posted on 5/17/26 at 11:46 am to ataraxia
quote:
Referring to yourself in third person while performing forensic attractiveness analysis on politicians is next-level forum degeneration.
Zach apologizes. Zach will try to do better.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 11:50 am to ataraxia
quote:
The irony of posting a “you big mad” meme in the middle of a paranoid political rant about hidden manipulation is almost performance art.
Dispute the rest of my post.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 11:57 am to loogaroo
“I think any wind can blow Letlow” is just vague forum poetry pretending to be analysis.
And the “she’ll adapt after Trump/Landry” point is strange because that’s actually a political strength. Politicians who can only survive attached to one faction usually don’t last very long. She has enough of a background in education, finance, and family policy to still operate politically beyond one specific coalition.
As for the carbon sequestration point, none of this is some hidden bombshell. People already knew who her fiancé was, the referendum still passed anyway, and Fleming still got absolutely buried. At some point y’all are going to have to come to terms with the fact that the electorate just did not buy what he was selling.
And the “she’ll adapt after Trump/Landry” point is strange because that’s actually a political strength. Politicians who can only survive attached to one faction usually don’t last very long. She has enough of a background in education, finance, and family policy to still operate politically beyond one specific coalition.
As for the carbon sequestration point, none of this is some hidden bombshell. People already knew who her fiancé was, the referendum still passed anyway, and Fleming still got absolutely buried. At some point y’all are going to have to come to terms with the fact that the electorate just did not buy what he was selling.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 12:04 pm to ataraxia
quote:
As for the carbon sequestration point, none of this is some hidden bombshell. People already knew who her fiancé was
No they didn’t.
quote:
And the “she’ll adapt after Trump/Landry” point is strange because that’s actually a political strength. Politicians who can only survive attached to one faction usually don’t last very long. She has enough of a background in education, finance, and family policy to still operate politically beyond one specific coalition.
You just made my point. She is a liability.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 12:11 pm to loogaroo
A politician being able to survive beyond one faction is not a liability. That’s called having actual political durability. If your definition of strength is “becomes unusable once one movement fades,” you’re describing a weak politician. And again, voters already tested your theory on Fleming. The result was not close.
The funniest part is the bizarre confidence with which you declare what millions of voters supposedly did or didn’t know, as if you’re sitting on classified intelligence instead of recycling forum talking points.
You keep talking like you uncovered some massive hidden truth when the election results strongly suggest most voters either already knew or simply did not care. There’s a strange level of self-importance in acting like you alone possess forbidden knowledge the electorate was tragically deprived of.
The funniest part is the bizarre confidence with which you declare what millions of voters supposedly did or didn’t know, as if you’re sitting on classified intelligence instead of recycling forum talking points.
You keep talking like you uncovered some massive hidden truth when the election results strongly suggest most voters either already knew or simply did not care. There’s a strange level of self-importance in acting like you alone possess forbidden knowledge the electorate was tragically deprived of.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 2:22 pm to ataraxia
quote:
This has moved well beyond normal forum banter and into “genuinely unstable person” territory.
Agreed, you are insane.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 2:23 pm to ataraxia
quote:hi Ms Letlow nice to meet you.
ataraxia
Posted on 5/17/26 at 2:32 pm to jimmy the leg
You basically just went with the middle-school “no u” response to something I said about somebody else, and then White Bear immediately arrived to prove the exact point by unironically acting like a congresswoman is secretly posting on TigerDroppings.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 2:34 pm to White Bear
You genuinely think a sitting congresswoman who is about to become a U.S. Senator is anonymously spending her afternoon arguing on TigerDroppings because someone online disagreed with you politically.
That is not normal behavior.
The inability to process ordinary political disagreement without spiraling into “this must secretly be Julia Letlow posting” is genuinely paranoid.
At some point y’all have to accept that not every person who disagrees with you is part of a secret political operation. The level of paranoia on this board is disturbing.
That is not normal behavior.
The inability to process ordinary political disagreement without spiraling into “this must secretly be Julia Letlow posting” is genuinely paranoid.
At some point y’all have to accept that not every person who disagrees with you is part of a secret political operation. The level of paranoia on this board is disturbing.
Popular
Back to top



1



