- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Legal eagles out there...I understand there are a few landowners in TX....
Posted on 2/16/19 at 1:50 pm to JuiceTerry
Posted on 2/16/19 at 1:50 pm to JuiceTerry
There may be lawsuits, but eminent domain is well settled law.
0
Posted on 2/16/19 at 1:51 pm to Skeezer
quote:
There are still eminent domain lawsuits from the bill bush passed.
Arguing over compensation. Not the land.
Posted on 2/16/19 at 1:52 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
member when most patriots considered eminent domain an abhorrent practice.
If there was ever a time for it...
Posted on 2/16/19 at 2:01 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
DC Circuit
They give more deference to government action than any other Federal Circuit. Give me the 5th all day.
Posted on 2/16/19 at 2:55 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
I member when most patriots considered eminent domain an abhorrent practice.
I remember the same regarding abortion. I guess times change.
Posted on 2/16/19 at 3:28 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
I member when most patriots considered eminent domain an abhorrent practice.
Depends on what it’s used for.
A barrier to keep out illegal fricks from trafficking young girls, drugs, and murdering American citizens.
Building railroads and interstate highways.
Those would be a good use of eminent domain.
Building a shopping center would be an abhorrent use of eminent domain.
Posted on 2/16/19 at 3:38 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
I member when most patriots considered eminent domain an abhorrent practice.
Still do. It depends on why it's used.
Posted on 2/16/19 at 4:06 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
There are still eminent domain lawsuits from the bill bush passed.
Arguing over compensation. Not the land.
They don't have a choice about the land Don't act like a clown
Posted on 2/16/19 at 4:10 pm to JuiceTerry
That’s my point.
Posted on 2/16/19 at 4:13 pm to BBONDS25
Your point is dumb
Of course people are going to sue for compensation for the land that their representatives take ftom them
Especially for a bogus reason
Of course people are going to sue for compensation for the land that their representatives take ftom them
Especially for a bogus reason
Posted on 2/16/19 at 4:14 pm to BBONDS25
quote:The fact that one’s property can be taken against one’s will and that the only question is one of compensation ... THAT is why the power should be used sparingly.quote:That’s my point.quote:They don't have a choice about the landquote:Arguing over compensation. Not the land.
There are still eminent domain lawsuits from the bill bush passed.
This post was edited on 2/16/19 at 4:31 pm
Posted on 2/16/19 at 4:16 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:BBonds couldn't out clown you with a red nose and size 24 shoes.
Don't act like a clown
Posted on 2/16/19 at 4:44 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
I member when most patriots considered eminent domain an abhorrent practice.
No - no you don't remember that.
What you may remember is redefining terms and purposefully misinterpreting information to support a conclusion that you want to prevail.
Posted on 2/16/19 at 4:52 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
The fact that one’s property can be taken against one’s will and that the only question is one of compensation
Well, that’s not the only question. There is a standard that has to be met to seize the land.
Posted on 2/16/19 at 4:57 pm to BBONDS25
Why didn't DJT have a sympathetic resident of Texas sue to block the wall, in hopes of getting a favorable ruling from the 5th Circuit?
Posted on 2/16/19 at 5:00 pm to dakarx
quote:
Because I have no idea... but why wouldn't the fed govt impose an easement on all national border property? Much like states and local govt does with property owners... so yeah you own it, but if we need access you must yield right of way.....
Exactly! I don't even truly own the lot my house sets on, the first 30 ft from the road is all county controlled property for utility easement.
Posted on 2/16/19 at 5:06 pm to BBONDS25
quote:Do not be disingenuous. The standard you reference is distressingly-low (far too law IMO), and 95% or more of eminent domain litigation relates to property values.quote:Well, that’s not the only question. There is a standard that has to be met to seize the land.
The fact that one’s property can be taken against one’s will and that the only question is one of compensation
Posted on 2/16/19 at 6:09 pm to AggieHank86
You should not seize private land for private development just to increase you tax revenues. For the public good it’s cool. We are not going to build an interstate because Zeke wants to keep the family farm?
Posted on 2/16/19 at 6:14 pm to zeebo
quote:
We are not going to build an interstate because Zeke wants to keep the family farm?
Move your interstate around Zeke's family farm, you statist prick Posted on 2/16/19 at 6:16 pm to Rohan Gravy
quote:
Depends on what it’s used for.
Disagree.
You either respect private property rights or you dont
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News