- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict.
Posted on 1/10/26 at 6:59 am to Coeur du Tigre
Posted on 1/10/26 at 6:59 am to Coeur du Tigre
What does the UAV attack on the Dnipro look like: photo report
January 10, 09:38
The Russian army launched a massive drone attack on the Dnipro on the night of January 10. According to the OVA, the strikes injured a man, caused a fire in a garage cooperative, and damaged infrastructure and high-rise buildings. In addition, there were power outages in the regional center and district.
What the Russian attack site looks like as of the morning of January 10 — in a photo report by Suspilny.
Volunteers are working at the site of the Russian airstrike on the Dnieper River. They are providing local residents with building materials to close up broken windows. Social Dnipro/Yuriy Tynny
Suspilne photo report
January 10, 09:38
The Russian army launched a massive drone attack on the Dnipro on the night of January 10. According to the OVA, the strikes injured a man, caused a fire in a garage cooperative, and damaged infrastructure and high-rise buildings. In addition, there were power outages in the regional center and district.
What the Russian attack site looks like as of the morning of January 10 — in a photo report by Suspilny.
Volunteers are working at the site of the Russian airstrike on the Dnieper River. They are providing local residents with building materials to close up broken windows. Social Dnipro/Yuriy Tynny
Suspilne photo report
1
Posted on 1/10/26 at 7:53 am to AFstAF
Well let's be clear, my argument is that they should look into banning anyone who spams propaganda (including accounts made yesterday that immediately started spamming this thread with Russian Twitter BS, so that includes you).
But I do think the melt you've already caused is objectively kind of funny.
But I do think the melt you've already caused is objectively kind of funny.
Posted on 1/10/26 at 8:00 am to VolSquatch
I'm not even posting propaganda, just facts on the ground from Ukrainian sources. Definitely a narrative, but if it's actually true than it is not exactly a "propaganda" in that negative sense of it. I'd never post opinion pieces or cope snippets like the rainbow kid.
Posted on 1/10/26 at 8:11 am to AFstAF
Dude it still is OLD arse technology that Russia discontinued trying to develop in the 1990s and recently revived. Cope much?
Maybe one day a Russian will invent the toilet and not have to steal that "modern" wonder from Ukrainian homes.
Maybe one day a Russian will invent the toilet and not have to steal that "modern" wonder from Ukrainian homes.
Posted on 1/10/26 at 8:19 am to AFstAF
You say only about 1000 Russian KIA each month? Talk about Cope! 
Your boss the Russian foreign minister disagrees with you
Your boss the Russian foreign minister disagrees with you
quote:
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated in July 2025 that Russia had lost approximately 100,000 soldiers killed in Ukraine during the first half of 2025, a figure he provided after meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, emphasizing significant Russian casualties despite denials from Moscow. This estimate, based on various intelligence and open-source data, highlighted the intense losses Russia sustained in the conflict, with President Trump also referencing high Russian fatality figures around that time.
Posted on 1/10/26 at 8:22 am to CitizenK
quote:
Dude it still is OLD arse technology that Russia discontinued trying to develop in the 1990s and recently revived. Cope much?
Maybe one day a Russian will invent the toilet and not have to steal that "modern" wonder from Ukrainian homes.
Quote what you're talking about. I was giving you an example.
If you're talking about Kalibr, cool. Yes, it's an "older" system developed in the 90s that's relatively cheap and works. AKs were made during WW2 and still work. Same as M67 grenade, if it works it works.
Oreshnik is however something nobody can surpass. A toilet moving at 3.5 km/s.
This post was edited on 1/10/26 at 8:24 am
Posted on 1/10/26 at 8:32 am to No Colors
My boss? You're posting fake news shilling for Kiev goblin.
Just little Marco running his trap. An actual clip. He does not cite anyone on the Russian side. He inserts his own spin. Read the comments on YT for the lulz.
No wonder you're so clueless about this conflict. You can't even pick up relevant info.
Rube.
Just little Marco running his trap. An actual clip. He does not cite anyone on the Russian side. He inserts his own spin. Read the comments on YT for the lulz.
No wonder you're so clueless about this conflict. You can't even pick up relevant info.
quote:
Senator Marco Rubio cited figures from US intelligence assessments, stating in mid-2025 that Russia had suffered over 100,000 military deaths in Ukraine, likely drawing from broader estimates of high Russian losses, though specific official sources for his precise figure weren't immediately detailed, but aligned with intelligence suggesting substantial casualties by that period
Rube.
This post was edited on 1/10/26 at 8:40 am
Posted on 1/10/26 at 8:37 am to AFstAF
Why do you keep coming back after being banned time and time again?
Are you that stupid? Or is the money just that good?
Are you that stupid? Or is the money just that good?
Posted on 1/10/26 at 8:44 am to AFstAF
quote:
Oreshnik is however something nobody can surpass. A toilet moving at 3.5 km/s
Correct it is a fast turd in the toilet.
A true hypersonic missile never leaves the earth's atmosphere. You are all bluster and nothing more.
COPE COPE COPE
Posted on 1/10/26 at 8:48 am to No Colors
If you post offensively stupid shite, it's gonna draw people who find it offensive to common sense and intelligent discussion.
This is not an intelligent discussion most of the time. It's offensive to everyone's intelligence what you spam, or other ones in here.
You're just sounding bitter, man. Why is this so hurtful to you? It doesn't affect my daily life or yours.
This is not an intelligent discussion most of the time. It's offensive to everyone's intelligence what you spam, or other ones in here.
quote:
Correct it is a fast turd in the toilet.
You're just sounding bitter, man. Why is this so hurtful to you? It doesn't affect my daily life or yours.
This post was edited on 1/10/26 at 8:52 am
Posted on 1/10/26 at 8:51 am to AFstAF
Imagine thinking Ukraine is winning
Posted on 1/10/26 at 9:00 am to texag7
quote:
Imagine thinking Ukraine is winning
They appear to have moved on from that to a "Russia is losing a lot to defeat Ukraine" phase. Whipping out casualties numbers not backed by anything, talking about fires and "shadow fleet" attacks.
Meanwhile Kiev mayor is encouraging people to evacuate and there are no volunteers joining the army with them relying on forced, largely unfit conscripts.
This post was edited on 1/10/26 at 9:02 am
Posted on 1/10/26 at 9:05 am to AFstAF
Posted on 1/10/26 at 10:07 am to CitizenK
I saw an article that said Ukraine and several Western countries are studying the remnants of that missile
Posted on 1/10/26 at 10:16 am to AFstAF
How great were the S-300's in Iran and Venezuela, or even Ukraine? Russia always grossly overpromises and under delivers with technology.
Posted on 1/10/26 at 10:20 am to VolSquatch
What is supposedly pictures of the debris
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Posted on 1/10/26 at 10:26 am to CitizenK
If you are an adversary of the US and you invested in Russian air defence systems...what's your pucker factor right now?
Russia won't even be able to give its weapon systems away. Who would want them?
Just another negative result for Russia stemming from its 2022 invasion.
Putin's a master strategist
Russia won't even be able to give its weapon systems away. Who would want them?
Just another negative result for Russia stemming from its 2022 invasion.
Putin's a master strategist
Posted on 1/10/26 at 10:35 am to texag7
Imagine thinking Russia is winning 
Posted on 1/10/26 at 11:11 am to Chromdome35
Let's recap Russia's losses since the start of their invasion in Feb 2022
Geopolitical losses
* Syria - Gone
* Venuzeula - Gone
* Armenia - Gone
* Russia still has a presense in Africa; however, they don't have the ability to project power there and their influence is waning.
* Iran is in the process of falling
* Finland - Joined NATO
* Sweden - Joined NATO
* The US and EU increase military spending
Militarily
* Over a Million Casualties
* Exposure of the Air Force as ineffectual
* Almost total depletion of their prewar stocks of armor vehicles
* The domination of the black sea fleet by a country with no navy
* Exposure of the total ineffectiveness of the Russian navy
* The loss of Wagner, its best ground combat unit, and Wagner's eventual mutiny
* Having the Russian navy on hand to take pictures of the US seizing Russia's oil tanker.
* The inability of the army to move forward at any more than a walking pace
* Having its strategic bomber fleet attacked in its bases by short-range drones
* Having its energy infrastructure attacked on a nightly basis and not being able to stop it
* Having to rely on horses and donkeys because it lost its truck transport fleet
* Needing 6 months to expel Ukraine from Russian territory
There is so much more, but you get the point...what has Russia gotten in return for all of this? 66km^2
Geopolitical losses
* Syria - Gone
* Venuzeula - Gone
* Armenia - Gone
* Russia still has a presense in Africa; however, they don't have the ability to project power there and their influence is waning.
* Iran is in the process of falling
* Finland - Joined NATO
* Sweden - Joined NATO
* The US and EU increase military spending
Militarily
* Over a Million Casualties
* Exposure of the Air Force as ineffectual
* Almost total depletion of their prewar stocks of armor vehicles
* The domination of the black sea fleet by a country with no navy
* Exposure of the total ineffectiveness of the Russian navy
* The loss of Wagner, its best ground combat unit, and Wagner's eventual mutiny
* Having the Russian navy on hand to take pictures of the US seizing Russia's oil tanker.
* The inability of the army to move forward at any more than a walking pace
* Having its strategic bomber fleet attacked in its bases by short-range drones
* Having its energy infrastructure attacked on a nightly basis and not being able to stop it
* Having to rely on horses and donkeys because it lost its truck transport fleet
* Needing 6 months to expel Ukraine from Russian territory
There is so much more, but you get the point...what has Russia gotten in return for all of this? 66km^2
Posted on 1/10/26 at 11:27 am to Chromdome35
There is no question Russia was far stronger 1/1/22 than on 1/1/26.
Another four years like this and Russia will be begging for NATO to help them against China.
Russia has already lost.
Another four years like this and Russia will be begging for NATO to help them against China.
Russia has already lost.
Page 476 of 652
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News