- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Keith Olbermann suspended from Twitter
Posted on 12/16/22 at 5:07 am to crazy4lsu
Posted on 12/16/22 at 5:07 am to crazy4lsu
quote:Original intent has limited relevance. Whatever the original intent, the concern was raised. Yet the behavior persisted, worsened, and even developed into an attempted $50K extortion. At that point, your skepticism becomes ill-founded, ludicrous.
I'm skeptical that they were 'made to intimidate.'
0
Posted on 12/16/22 at 6:20 am to boosiebadazz
quote:no, libs of TikTok just reposts videos that people themselves already posted publicly to the Internet, you fricking retard
Does Libs of TikTok dox people?
Posted on 12/16/22 at 6:32 am to lsunatchamp
quote:
The answer is it is against the law
Doesn’t have to be against the law. It just has to violate the TOS Olberman and others agreed to follow.
They are welcomed to start their own platform.
Posted on 12/16/22 at 6:35 am to Rebel
I know a tree surgeon who will give Olbermann a job feeding the chipper.
Posted on 12/16/22 at 6:36 am to KosmoCramer
Threats
He needs to be institutionalized.
He needs to be institutionalized.
Posted on 12/16/22 at 6:37 am to crazy4lsu
quote:He travels with a substantial security detail. The thing speaks for itself.
Then why was BezosJet suspended? Were there credible threats of harm posed to him?
Posted on 12/16/22 at 7:10 am to Ronaldo Burgundiaz
quote:
Today is the blue check Vietnam.
The Fall of Soygon.
That 10 word smart-assism just gave me a boner....
Posted on 12/16/22 at 7:10 am to NashvilleTider
quote:
how the turntables!
Ricky from TPB or Michael Scott?
Posted on 12/16/22 at 7:11 am to cwill
quote:
I thought y’all were free speech absolutists?
We are, retard.....see what I did there ?
Posted on 12/16/22 at 7:12 am to Lsuhoohoo
quote:
Keith Olbermann suspended from Twitter
Shoe, meet other foot!
Posted on 12/16/22 at 7:13 am to Lsuhoohoo
Good. Blabbermouth extraordinaire. Now give'um a job doing traffc reports in East LA.
This post was edited on 12/16/22 at 7:14 am
Posted on 12/16/22 at 7:55 am to crazy4lsu
quote:The fact you weren't the first to bring up "Libs of TikTok" is irrelevant. Here is what you said:
I wasn't the first to bring up Libs of TikTok numbnuts. Follow the thread.
quote:Nope.
I asked a specific question asking what the distinction was from what Libs of TikTok was doing, and what the ElonJet account was doing. Apparently, the distinction is that Elon can choose to not allow one based on preferences, not any real principle.
That is not the "distinction."
Not remotely. Not close. Not even reasonably debatable.
Yet, when posters point out the obvious difference or "distinction" between revelation of a point of view (TikTok) and revelation of an endangered individual's physical presence, destination, and exact time of arrival (Doxxers), you attempt to dodge your own declaration, saying instead:
"I wasn't the first to bring up Libs of TikTok numbnuts."
Your responses seem to fall into a pattern. You get caught in logical fallacy, then attempt to shift contextual paradigm while implying your foil just doesn't get it. In this case, the argument is no longer about a "distinction" which you yourself personally drew. Instead, you imply that as someone else previously brought up the subject, you should be immune from your own expressed musings on it.
Then you further the implication by addressing the caller-to-question as "numbnuts."
Just an observation though.
Posted on 12/16/22 at 7:58 am to UFMatt
quote:Foot meet arse.
Shoe, meet other foot!
Posted on 12/16/22 at 8:05 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
He travels with a substantial security detail. The thing speaks for itself.
Musk doesn't? That is a spurious distinction, which I don't think were actually applied here. It's far more likely that every account that followed a well-known person's private jet was banned.
Posted on 12/16/22 at 8:08 am to cwill
quote:
I thought y’all were free speech absolutists?
What does this have to do with free speech? Was the government involved in any way?
Posted on 12/16/22 at 8:09 am to stout
quote:
The dude has really gone off the deep end
One of those pretend libertarians who is neck deep up his own Progressive arse.
Figs dislike truth.
Posted on 12/16/22 at 8:09 am to cwill
quote:
There is no 1st amendment violation in posting publicly available information.
You think the 1st amendment is a limitation on citizens?
Posted on 12/16/22 at 8:10 am to WinnPtiger
quote:
you’re a less intelligent, yet equally useless SFP
I think Boosie was an affirmative action admittee.
Posted on 12/16/22 at 8:13 am to boosiebadazz
so was banning political voices only OK when some leftist lunatics were running twitter? Because they pretended to be all about free speech too.
You are the mirror image of the people you are criticizing.
or maybe, just maybe, Olbermann is a doxxing psychopath.
You are the mirror image of the people you are criticizing.
or maybe, just maybe, Olbermann is a doxxing psychopath.
Posted on 12/16/22 at 8:13 am to crazy4lsu
quote:I don't think you follow. Try again. Yes Musk travels with security. Why?
Musk doesn't?
Why does one need a security detail?
Page 9 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News