- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kansas Mayor Charged With Election Fraud
Posted on 11/7/25 at 9:27 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 11/7/25 at 9:27 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:you argued against trumps EO on the grounds that is already illegal for them to vote and the EO is unnecessary
quote:
what is your grounds for opposing the passage and/or enforcement of measures to ensure that illegal aliens don’t vote?
LINK to me doing this, too, please.
2
Posted on 11/7/25 at 9:30 am to Jbird
And here I thought the voters of NYC were dumbasses! Coldwater elected an illegal as their mayor! 
Posted on 11/7/25 at 9:33 am to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
you argued against trumps EO
Which EO? What did I say?
quote:
and the EO is unnecessary
That is a different argument than this
quote:
opposing the passage and/or enforcement of measures
Calling something unnecessary =/= opposing the policy.
Posted on 11/7/25 at 9:33 am to UncleFestersLegs
You’re arguing with a fundamentally dishonest person.
Posted on 11/7/25 at 9:34 am to thebigmuffaletta
He is an ignorant fool who has more misplaced confidence than an overweight chick at a nightclub after too much alcohol
Posted on 11/7/25 at 9:34 am to the808bass
quote:
fundamentally autistic
Small edit for you.
Posted on 11/7/25 at 9:36 am to the808bass
quote:
You’re arguing with a fundamentally dishonest person.
Who is ironically defending himself against dishonesty and being called dishonest for doing so
Posted on 11/7/25 at 9:39 am to SlowFlowPro
You’re a toddler who argues just for the sake of arguing by molding your positions to fit whatever narrative is convenient
Posted on 11/7/25 at 9:40 am to Rip Torn
quote:
by molding your positions to fit whatever narrative is convenient
Again, another example of dishonesty
I won't ask you to show your work and just note it to add to the others in this thread.
Posted on 11/7/25 at 9:41 am to SlowFlowPro
You’re arguing semantic points to make yourself feel better about your overall shite point.
What number of non-citizens voting in an election would signify a problem?
What number of non-citizens voting in an election would signify a problem?
Posted on 11/7/25 at 9:43 am to the808bass
quote:
SlowFlowPro
quote:
You’re arguing with a fundamentally dishonest person.
I know it won't happen, but it would be nice if people simply stopped engaging him at all. Let him comment, but NEVER respond.
I avoid reading his comments or any responses people make to him because it completely bogs down the discussion and mostly drives the thread off-topic. He seeks attention and has a driving need to be active on this board as his outlet for said attention. I.e. stop feeding the most accomplished troll on TD poli board.
Posted on 11/7/25 at 9:44 am to SlowFlowPro
I don’t care enough to “show” my work. You are a child and it would be pointless. You would claim that wasn’t really your position. It’s what you do and others fall for it every time
Posted on 11/7/25 at 9:46 am to the808bass
quote:
You’re arguing semantic points
Not at all. People are fundamentally mis-stating positions and in some cases making shite up entirely.
quote:
about your overall shite point.
That OP relies on a straw man?
How is that a shite point?
quote:
What number of non-citizens voting in an election would signify a problem?
The question should be phrased in terms of % and not total numbers.
The real question, as always, is the costs involved compared to the potential threat.
That's why policies like requiring ID (low cost) to vote are good policies.
The problem, as always, is that when people are willing to engage in dishonesty and fraud, they have an advantage. How much of a burden on legal, law-abiding citizens is worth the cost of impact? That's when the potential threat enters the calculation. High-cost solutions that are not likely to make any meaningful difference are going to be an issue.
Posted on 11/7/25 at 9:46 am to SlowFlowPro
You didn’t answer the fricking question.
Posted on 11/7/25 at 9:49 am to the808bass
Let's do this to test the validity/quality of that question (as I explained the problems with it beforehand). You answer first and show us how easy it is.
What number of non-citizens voting in an election would signify a problem?
What number of non-citizens voting in an election would signify a problem?
Posted on 11/7/25 at 9:50 am to SlowFlowPro
When the number of known illegitimate voters approaches 50% of the delta between the winner and the loser.
Posted on 11/7/25 at 9:51 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What number of non-citizens voting in an election would signify a problem?
Any number higher than ZERO
Posted on 11/7/25 at 9:51 am to the808bass
It wasn’t even hard to answer. You don’t want to answer because you don’t really believe what you say.
Because you’re a fundamentally dishonest person.
Because you’re a fundamentally dishonest person.
Posted on 11/7/25 at 9:53 am to the808bass
quote:
When the number of known illegitimate voters approaches 50% of the delta between the winner and the loser.
That sounds reasonable for discussion purposes, but it would be very difficult to be enacted as a policy.
The way I read your question required a response of an integer.
Posted on 11/7/25 at 9:53 am to the808bass
quote:
It wasn’t even hard to answer. You don’t want to answer because you don’t really believe what you say.
I'm sorry to disappoint your prediction and make it incorrect.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News