- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Just curious as to who believes in aliens/UFOs coverup
Posted on 8/4/17 at 6:13 pm to Enadious
Posted on 8/4/17 at 6:13 pm to Enadious
quote:
What PROOF do you have that it didn't? Don't play strawman games, it's an ignorant path.
so now it's on me to prove a negative
what proof do you have that life didn't originate elsewhere? see how impossible that is? you can do better
1
Posted on 8/4/17 at 6:15 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
The problem is that you don't possess the requisite knowledge or skill to even evaluate your info and claims
Unlike you and the other biased close-minded skeptics, at least I have the requisite knowledge to know that a part of the scientific process is to examine all of the evidence in detail with an unbiased eye before coming to a determination regarding what the data included in the evidence shows.
quote:
I might as well be arguing with a 2nd grader regarding what causes the sky to appear blue.
It's the equivalent of "fact fact fact"........"nuh uh.....look..... It's blue. I see it with my eyes!!!!"
I've earned a Bachelor of Science in Mathematics so you are not talking to an uneducated 2nd grader.
All you can do is insult, insult, insult and say, "Duh uh...sea serpents don't exist...I know because the scientific community says sea serpents don't exist!!!"
Posted on 8/4/17 at 6:19 pm to bmy
quote:
so now it's on me to prove a negative
If someone sees a cat and says it is a dog then it is possible to prove that it is not a dog.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 6:34 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
If someone sees a cat and says it is a dog then it is possible to prove that it is not a dog.
By proving a positive. You prove that it is a cat ergo it is not a dog.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 6:39 pm to bencoleman
quote:
You've made this comment more than once in this forum as if it's a thing. You act like there are certified geniuses running around here and that they're above reproach.
I wasn't talking about anyone here. Pay attention.
quote:
Nobody's better than anyone else here.
I disagree.
quote:
their actual IQ
Jesus.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 6:40 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
After all, it's the last straw you have to grasp onto
Nah. This is the only "straw" I even bothered with.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 6:41 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
I've earned a Bachelor of Science in Mathematics so you are not talking to an uneducated 2nd grader.
Ok. Then that settles it.
You're a charlatan
Posted on 8/4/17 at 6:49 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
sent my 3rd video to a so-called marine biologist to examine. The video is 7 minutes in length and shows one of the animals entering SF Bay through the Golden Gate and a portion of the animal can be seen surfacing and going back underwater about 100 times at different distances from the head of the animal.
When the marine biologist wrote back he said it was obviously just an inanimate object bobbing up and down in the water as it floated into the bay with the incoming tide.
We had to send this so-called scientist the tide chart for the day and time of the sighting which showed that at the time of the sighting it was a slack tide with the tide beginning to go out then we told him he should have at least checked a tide chart for the day and time of the sighting before jumping to his conclusion.
You're a damn lunatic. Good on them for actually showing you what was going on.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 6:49 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
denying there are any good videos of UFOs
Link one, Einstein.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 6:51 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
I've earned a Bachelor of Science in Mathematics
Is that lunatic for "PhD in Marine Biology"?
Posted on 8/4/17 at 7:17 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
I've earned a Bachelor of Science in Mathematics
quote:
Is that lunatic for "PhD in Marine Biology"?
No one needs a PhD in Marine Biology to know they see a 60+ foot sea serpent when it beaches itself directly in front of them only 20 yards away.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 7:24 pm to BamaAtl
Posted on 8/4/17 at 7:27 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
No one needs a PhD in Marine Biology to know they see a 60+ foot sea serpent
Apparently they do to distinguish between an oarfish and a magical Loch Ness monster when it's right in front of them.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 7:28 pm to DawgfaninCa
1997, looks edited.
I thought you said good ones, and I thought you said in the era of phone cameras?
I thought you said good ones, and I thought you said in the era of phone cameras?
Posted on 8/4/17 at 7:35 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
sent my 3rd video to a so-called marine biologist to examine. The video is 7 minutes in length and shows one of the animals entering SF Bay through the Golden Gate and a portion of the animal can be seen surfacing and going back underwater about 100 times at different distances from the head of the animal.
When the marine biologist wrote back he said it was obviously just an inanimate object bobbing up and down in the water as it floated into the bay with the incoming tide.
We had to send this so-called scientist the tide chart for the day and time of the sighting which showed that at the time of the sighting it was a slack tide with the tide beginning to go out then we told him he should have at least checked a tide chart for the day and time of the sighting before jumping to his conclusion.
quote:
You're a damn lunatic. Good on them for actually showing you what was going on.
Meh, a professional unbiased Marine Biologist would have checked a tide chart for the day and time of our sighting BEFORE they jumped to the conclusion that the object in our third video was only an inanimate object floating on the surface of the water and coming into SF Bay with the incoming tide.
This post was edited on 8/4/17 at 7:37 pm
Posted on 8/4/17 at 7:42 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
1997, looks edited.
It looked unedited to me.
quote:
I thought you said good ones...
It is a good one. Those lights are stationary in the sky above Phoenix as they come on one by one and go off one by one and hundreds of people witnessed it.
quote:
and I thought you said in the era of phone cameras?
You thought wrong because I didn't say that.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 7:45 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
As far as what I personally think, I'll just say the universe is more incredible than human beings are capable of imagining.
True. We monkey brained creatures do not have the capacity to begin to conceptualize the multiverse.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 7:47 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
No one needs a PhD in Marine Biology to know they see a 60+ foot sea serpent
quote:
Apparently they do to distinguish between an oarfish and a magical Loch Ness monster when it's right in front of them.
I've posted in a thread on this site and my blog some of the differences between an oarfish and the animal my brother and I saw beach itself directly in front of us only 20 yards away on February 5, 1985.
What we saw did not look anything like an oarfish.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 7:50 pm to DarthTiger
quote:
Have you seen The Pyramid Code (on Netflix/Hulu)? Fascinating stuff.
I'm watching all the episodes of season one right now.
Thanks for telling me to watch it.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 8:00 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
I thought you said good ones, and I thought you said in the era of phone cameras?
Go ahead. Ask him why, when he went back, he STILL didn't use a high end camera.
That explanation is a hoot.
Page 32 of 58
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News