- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jury Deliberation Day 2: Rekieta Law live now
Posted on 11/17/21 at 8:55 am to hogcard1964
Posted on 11/17/21 at 8:55 am to hogcard1964
quote:
What's the story with Jump Kick Man?
He's been identified and apparently approached the prosecution a while back willing to testify.
1
Posted on 11/17/21 at 8:55 am to rt3
quote:
to recap the kinda big thing that Rekieta went over in his late night recap video...
the defense filed the motion for a mistrial with prejudice Monday night... and the biggest piece of new information in the motion involves the drone video
the defense says the prosecutors only provided the defense with the drone video that allegedly "shows" Kyle lifting his rifle at the Zibinskis (sp?) late, late last week, but most importantly... they only sent them a really compressed version of the video (like 400-something pixels high) and not the HD version that the prosecution showed in court and had the enhance guy enhance to the blob they allege shows Kyle lifting his rifle
another potential example of prosecutorial misconduct by LittleBinger & Fatlock
ETA: and they may have to amend it to include that Jump Kick Man was identified prior to the trial, was a known person, went to talk to police/prosecutors, and yet the prosecutors went the whole trial saying he's an unknown assailant
Thanks - I missed all that.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 8:56 am to hogcard1964
quote:
What's the story with Jump Kick Man?
The prosecution said they couldn't ID him. It turns out he called the DA to make a deal on some of existing charges.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 8:56 am to Meauxjeaux
quote:
How old do we think Runkle is?
guessing 35..... just premature gray hair.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 8:59 am to Lsut81
quote:
the jury asking for the instructions yesterday isn't a good sign IMO
I view it as the opposite. There have been jurists that have recently come out in public from very public trials and smeared the process as flawed because they were not afforded information or all options.
Requesting information confirms a vested interest in solidifying positions, and ensuring they have exhausted possibilities.
This is a poignant time for the U.S. justice system to show it is not in a continued nose dive. This post was edited on 11/17/21 at 9:00 am
Posted on 11/17/21 at 9:01 am to Bourre
quote:
Yea but Legal Bytes is hot and we might get pictures of her feet if we are lucky
Legal Bytes in her PJs yesterday was #1. Green jersey during week one is a close second.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 9:01 am to CoachDon
quote:
I view it as the opposite. There have been jurists that have recently come out in public from very public trials and smeared the process as flawed because they were not afforded information or all options.
But again, if they determine self defense, there is no reason to go to any of the other charges.
So the fact that they want to look at all of the instructions makes me think they haven't found self defense and are looking at which charge they want to convict on.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 9:01 am to Lsut81
Posted on 11/17/21 at 9:04 am to BobBoucher
quote:
I mean, the few times ive needed a lawyer, ive played hell just getting a return phone call.
Have you seen how much SFP posts on here?
Posted on 11/17/21 at 9:05 am to Lsut81
Yep. They did not share evidence in its admitted form and knowingly withheld the identity of a key witness.
This is just from YESTERDAY! There was already a motion to dismiss based on earlier constitutional violations.
This is just from YESTERDAY! There was already a motion to dismiss based on earlier constitutional violations.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 9:06 am to BobBoucher
quote:
These guys all seem like really bright lawyers. How is it they have all day to sit in on the Rekieta stream?
It’s really good marketing.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 9:06 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
knowingly withheld the identity of a key witness.
Has this been proven yet? I know it is out there, but just curious if it 100%?
Posted on 11/17/21 at 9:07 am to TDTOM
quote:
The prosecution said they couldn't ID him. It turns out he called the DA to make a deal on some of existing charges.
And there’s no way to explain this away. The video will likely be argued several different ways - none in good faith- but there’s no way to sell a straight lie to the defense about not knowing who this potential witness is.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 9:07 am to Lsut81
I think the judge asked that they disregard the lessers if they reach acquittal on murder.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 9:09 am to TDTOM
The reporting is that jump kick turned himself into the Kenosha County DA offering testimony in exchange for immunity on other pending charges. It will be impossible to cover that up if it happened. Keep in mind the state has said, in trial, that he was unidentified.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 9:09 am to Lsut81
quote:
So the fact that they want to look at all of the instructions makes me think they haven't found self defense and are looking at which charge they want to convict on.
Those instructions were pretty specific n what they could and could not consider in their verdict. It could be that there’s some debate within the jury and they wanted the instructions to remind some jurors what could or couldn’t be considered.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 9:11 am to rt3
I thought it was the opposite. I thought they withheld the HD version that showed he didn’t aim his rifle and only showed the shitty version in court so they could help the jury imagine he had aimed his rifle?
But, maybe I’m mistaken.
But, maybe I’m mistaken.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 9:11 am to Badface
quote:
quote:
How old do we think Runkle is?
guessing 35..... just premature gray hair.
Who the hell is downvoting me on that? LOL
just looked it up... he is 32.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 9:13 am to Bwmdx
could be. They definitely did NOT share the higher definition video with the defense. That is the objection.
Remember, this "higher" definition is algorithmic pixel interpolation that was hotly debated prior to closing arguments, and is essentially the only "evidence" the state has for its provocation argument. Its a bigger deal than it sounds on the surface.
Remember, this "higher" definition is algorithmic pixel interpolation that was hotly debated prior to closing arguments, and is essentially the only "evidence" the state has for its provocation argument. Its a bigger deal than it sounds on the surface.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 9:14 am to Badface
quote:
Who the hell is downvoting me on that? LOL
Doubt you were downvoted based on the content. It was probably because you have one of those faces.
Page 2 of 56
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News