- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judicial Watch: University Releases Details on Kirk Murder Scene
Posted on 7/11/26 at 2:37 pm to BoarEd
Posted on 7/11/26 at 2:37 pm to BoarEd
Youve posted this about 4 times now, and I'm actually beginning to get embarrassed for you. Like I said earlier, you havent even clicked on the supporting docs that Judicial Watch posted, because your quote is a sarcastic reply to a text saying "I hear your guys are getting harassed by the media"
To which the contractor replied "my guys are well trained in keeping quiet"
As if his team works nationally noted assassinations all the time
Dude, stop posting.Read the source material. And then let it go
There is no FBI or governor involvement in any of the sourced docs. None
This post was edited on 7/11/26 at 2:40 pm
Posted on 7/11/26 at 2:38 pm to RazorBroncs
quote:
By going all "the Jews did this"
You're doing it again and you're still the only one talking about the Jews doing anything here.
This is like Jussie Smollet shite happening in real time. The Jewish glowie is literally in here saying that other people are blaming Jews while he is the only person posting about Jews.
This post was edited on 7/11/26 at 2:41 pm
Posted on 7/11/26 at 2:42 pm to BoarEd
quote:
You can go frick yourself, by the way.
It's amazing how you can go from being cool to throwing obvious frickin lies and slander out at the drop of a hat because you don't like a single thread. You post like a frickin psycho.
You don't even see the irony do you?
I don't attack you personally Ed, never have and never will.
You know who else feels "personally attacked" when their ideals are challenged with words? The type of guy that murdered Charlie Kirk and think words are violence if they don't agree with them.
Posted on 7/11/26 at 2:43 pm to RobbBobb
It's the same frickin thing the worker says in the video posted on page one.
Posted on 7/11/26 at 2:43 pm to RazorBroncs
Exactly, muddy the water with the crazies so that anything surrounding the discussion is labeled as crazy to the general public.
Posted on 7/11/26 at 2:44 pm to BoarEd
Doesn’t matter the chronology refutes your theory. Sorry you overlooked something that breaks your narrative. Thats nobody else’s fault.
Posted on 7/11/26 at 2:46 pm to RazorBroncs
I didn't say you personally attacked me. I said lies and slander.
If you don't see the above as lies and slander then please find for me where I have alleged some grand Jewish conspiracy. You can't, because it doesn't exist. You're the only one in here talking about Jews.
If you don't see the above as lies and slander then please find for me where I have alleged some grand Jewish conspiracy. You can't, because it doesn't exist. You're the only one in here talking about Jews.
Posted on 7/11/26 at 2:51 pm to BoarEd
quote:
If you don't see the above as lies and slander then please find for me where I have alleged some grand Jewish conspiracy. You can't, because it doesn't exist. You're the only one in here talking about Jews
And you continue to play dumb as if everyone hasn't seen the numerous conspiracy theorists claiming Mossad had Charlie killed. That is THE conspiracy theory involved here, I haven't seen any others even floated out there. But you know this, you're just playing dumb for whatever reason.
It's telling you outright refuse to even say what you're implying with this thread. What is the implication of the grass being dug up and replaced with pavers? It's a simple question
Posted on 7/11/26 at 2:53 pm to Madking
Gray pave stones won out over red.


Posted on 7/11/26 at 2:55 pm to RazorBroncs
quote:
And you continue to play dumb as if everyone hasn't seen the numerous conspiracy theorists claiming Mossad had Charlie killed. That is THE conspiracy theory involved here, I haven't seen any others even floated out there. But you know this, you're just playing dumb for whatever reason.
Really? As I said in the OP I haven't followed it much.
But one thing I was interested to hear about was when Tim Burchett suggested it was the CIA that programmed this guy as an MKUltra asset/victim. I heard this when I was checking out the MKUltra hearing.
So even someone who hasn't looked into the Kirk assassination theories (myself) much has heard other explanations.
As I said in the OP, this is new information I am bringing for discussion. What's most interesting to me is why some of you seem so desperate to try to wrangle me in on some opinion on all of this when I haven't formed one.
But if you must know I tend to think Tim Burchett is probably closer to the truth than Candace Owens.
This post was edited on 7/11/26 at 2:58 pm
Posted on 7/11/26 at 2:57 pm to RobbBobb
BoarEd-
Hey, the talking point about the "FBI or govt covering the crime scene" failed in this thread many pages ago.
Stop playing passive, the new talking points are in. On X the agents of chaos are desperately saying there was no video shown to the family and close friends in court.
Some glowie Stew Peter's saying the video of the snipers perch is made up, so they the jews-can kill Robinson. It is aggregating.
Even you can see how bananas this is, no?
Hey, the talking point about the "FBI or govt covering the crime scene" failed in this thread many pages ago.
Stop playing passive, the new talking points are in. On X the agents of chaos are desperately saying there was no video shown to the family and close friends in court.
Some glowie Stew Peter's saying the video of the snipers perch is made up, so they the jews-can kill Robinson. It is aggregating.
Even you can see how bananas this is, no?
This post was edited on 7/11/26 at 3:00 pm
Posted on 7/11/26 at 2:57 pm to Victor R Franko
Screen shot says 2026, this was September of last year I’m talking about.
Posted on 7/11/26 at 2:58 pm to cajunangelle
My last post was intended for BoarEd.
Posted on 7/11/26 at 2:58 pm to Madking
You're the one making shite up. The work was done in about 2 days, completed on Sunday 4 days after the shooting. Photo I posted was taken on Sunday September 14th
Posted on 7/11/26 at 2:59 pm to Victor R Franko
quote:
You're the one making shite up.
There is a lot of that going on in this thread.
Posted on 7/11/26 at 2:59 pm to Victor R Franko
Already posting the proof so no, you’re wrong.
Posted on 7/11/26 at 3:00 pm to BoarEd
You’re really settling in and getting comfortable with making yourself an a-hole. Pretty remarkable.
Posted on 7/11/26 at 3:01 pm to Madking
Look again. I just took that screenshot to post here. Photo comes from the document release.
Here . https://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Utah-Valley-University-Charlie-Kirk-records-prod-1-2026.pdf
Now quit making shite up we have enough of that already.
Damn it, just one more made up POS and I'm gonna quit and call in my good buddy SFP to take over! He'll jump on this thread like a duck on a June bug!
Here . https://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Utah-Valley-University-Charlie-Kirk-records-prod-1-2026.pdf
Now quit making shite up we have enough of that already.
Damn it, just one more made up POS and I'm gonna quit and call in my good buddy SFP to take over! He'll jump on this thread like a duck on a June bug!
This post was edited on 7/11/26 at 3:11 pm
Posted on 7/11/26 at 3:02 pm to Madking
This is all very interesting, can someone explain what the thinking is here about what they covered up? Thank you!
Posted on 7/11/26 at 3:04 pm to lsuguy84
quote:
You’re really settling in and getting comfortable with making yourself an a-hole. Pretty remarkable.
Oh, so the frickin FED who just outright lied about me and said I was blaming Jews (even though I've done no such thing) isn't the a-hole for lying. When the fed says that the "Jews did it" conspiracy theory is the only game in town and I counter that by pointing out that there is a sitting congress member on the oversight committee who suggests the CIA was behind it that makes me an a-hole?
The a-hole isn't the guy telling lies, but me for pointing them out?
More like you frickin glowies just don't like being proven wrong and you continue to cry about it like frickin pussies.
Popular
Back to top



2






