Started By
Message

re: Judge Tigar defies federal appeals court, reinstates injunction against asylum ban

Posted on 9/10/19 at 2:19 pm to
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23154 posts
Posted on 9/10/19 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

There's a door on these here interwebz??? You lying twat


You still crying?

Yes you are.

Nerve struck.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 9/10/19 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

quote:

quote:

quote:

He's now trying to claim I'm an alter or some other nonsense since he can't beat me.....
No, Ooga, I am not (saying that). An “alter” is an “alternate” user name, utilized to appear as two different posters in the same time period. Your personality just gets you banned repeatedly, creating a series of non-overlapping user names.
So you are just a banned poster who came back with a different user name. But not an alter. Got it.
Hmm..........he does seem to be saying that, doesn't he
Shorty, shame on you. We both know that you read and understand English better than these two dolts.
This post was edited on 9/10/19 at 2:23 pm
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 9/10/19 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

Shorty, shame on you. We both know that you read and understand English better than these two dolts.



Um, you chose an interesting way of saying it.
quote:

No, Ooga, I am not (saying that). An “alter” is an “alternate” user name, utilized to appear as two different posters in the same time period.


What was the necessity of the bolded language if you didn't mean that you may have been someone else, just not "in the same period of time"?

I mean. A simple, "no, I've never been anyone else" would seem the more common way to answer.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 9/10/19 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

You still crying?

Yes you are.

Nerve struck.



Ok, so we're not going to engage in "serious debate" based off your mind reading skills but we will keep up this level of debate until one of us gets the last word.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 9/10/19 at 2:29 pm to
Between the "You're a liar" rage posts and this esoteric "alter" debate, I'd say this thread has jumped the shark.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23154 posts
Posted on 9/10/19 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

Ok, so we're not going to engage in "serious debate" based off your mind reading skills but we will keep up this level of debate until one of us gets the last word


I’m having fun. You’re crying, seems like you should leave. Your choice though.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 9/10/19 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

What was the necessity of the bolded language if you didn't mean that you may have been someone else, just not "in the same period of time"?

I mean. A simple, "no, I've never been anyone else" would seem the more common way to answer.
Why would I say that I was not “someone else,” when no one had accused me of being “someone else?” I am also not a medical doctor or a Russian immigrant. Should I say that in every thread?

I was addressing Ooga’s obvious serial string of new user names after permabans, as compared to other posters (cough, coug, tinypic problem, cough)**** who clearly use contemporaneous alternate user names.

Did you see the post where I said that you are an intelligent and rational poster who just loses his mind on a handful of topics? Amigo, this tinfoil conspiracy business is one of those topics.


****surely I am not the only one who has noticed that several posters have simultaneously had their avatar pics deleted by tinypic.
This post was edited on 9/10/19 at 2:54 pm
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 9/10/19 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

this esoteric "alter" debate
Well, I mean. I didn't post "I'm not an alter because an alter is when you have two personalities posting in the same time period"

That's not my fault
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 9/10/19 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

’m having fun. You’re crying, seems like you should leave. Your choice though.


Last word?
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 9/10/19 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

Why would I say that I was not “someone else,” when no one had accused me of being “someone else
Now Aggie. You're dancing a bit on a pin suddenly.

If you are accused of being an alter, the correct response is, "I'm not one".

If, your response is, "I'm not one because an alter is when you post under two profiles in the same time period", people are going to NATURALLY assume that you mean that at some point in the past, you had a different profile you posted under.

Let's not pretend that's not a completely normal assumption please.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 9/10/19 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

If you are accused of being an alter, the correct response is, "I'm not one".
And when you asked that question, that is exactly what I said. The post you reference was me saying that the OogaBooga persona is NOT an “alter,” but rather the most-recent in a string of serial usernames arising from permabans

You are making the same argument as the dimwits who claimed that poster-X was a pedo, because he distinguished (as to a completely different accused “pedo) between a pedophile and an ephebophile.

Again, you are too smart for this silly discussion. The other two? Not so much.
This post was edited on 9/10/19 at 2:41 pm
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 9/10/19 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

The other two? Not so much.


Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 9/10/19 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

You are making the same argument as the dimwits who claimed that poster-X was a pedo, because he distinguished (as to a completely different accused “pedo) between a pedophile and an ephebophile.

I think I missed this particular one

Although, I distinguish between the two so maybe I was the target!
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79984 posts
Posted on 9/10/19 at 2:48 pm to
No, the correct response to alter accusations is none at all.

Same with being called ___ist or ___phobe.

Not even worth acknowledging.
This post was edited on 9/10/19 at 2:50 pm
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 9/10/19 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

quote:

You are making the same argument as the dimwits who claimed that poster-X was a pedo, because he distinguished (as to a completely different accused “pedo) between a pedophile and an ephebophile.
I think I missed this particular one
The exchange was rinsed and repeated a dozen times during the Epstein debacle. Anyone who said “sex with teenagers is not really pedophilia” was accused of being a pedophile by some dimwit.

As I said, you are (far) brighter than that, which is why I find this thread so odd. One would think you are misinterpreting me for entertainment’s sake.
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 9/10/19 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

Anyone who said “sex with teenagers is not really pedophilia” was accused of being a pedophile by some dimwit.

C'mon, Hank. Everybody knows that anyone who has sex with anyone under the age of 18 who is over the age of 18 is a frickin' pedophile. And anyone who thinks otherwise is also a pedophile. Unless you are a hot female teacher. Then it's "where was she when I was in high school."
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111498 posts
Posted on 9/10/19 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

Anyone who said “sex with teenagers is not really pedophilia” was accused of being a pedophile by some dimwit.


Not really. People who defended attraction to barely-post-pubescent teens were called pedophiles.
Posted by LSU5508
New Orleans
Member since Nov 2007
3614 posts
Posted on 9/11/19 at 11:56 am to
Well that didn't last long. frick of Tigar!

quote:

A federal appeals court on Tuesday temporarily rolled back the nationwide injunction preventing the Trump Administration’s asylum ban – requiring any migrants passing through Central America to seek asylum in one the nations they pass through before applying in the U.S. from taking effect. In response to a “Renewed Emergency Motion” submitted by the Justice Department, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an administrative order granting the government’s request to stay the nationwide injunction put in place Monday night by U.S. District Court Judge Jon Tigar of California. Tigar reasoned that a nationwide injunction was necessary because of the need to “maintain uniform immigration policy.”
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 9/11/19 at 12:04 pm to
Can I just point out that the 9th Circuit IMMEDIATELY telling Tiguar to frick himself kinda guts the theory that the 9th "winked" at Tiguar and wanted him to do what he did.

Just sayin..........
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 9/11/19 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

Just sayin..........


The system worked in the Trump admins favor?
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram