- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Judge Rejects Lawsuit Against Lafayette Hospital Vaccine Mandate
Posted on 9/23/21 at 4:23 pm
Posted on 9/23/21 at 4:23 pm
A lot of medical workers were relying on this to at least buy them some time. Probably the worst outcome that could have happened:
KATC.com Article
KATC.com Article
12
Posted on 9/23/21 at 4:25 pm to DotBling
no standing
doctors and nurses are too dumb to make their own educated and informed medical decisions, daddy biden decides whats best for you
doctors and nurses are too dumb to make their own educated and informed medical decisions, daddy biden decides whats best for you
Posted on 9/23/21 at 4:29 pm to DotBling
American freedom is a sick joke
Posted on 9/23/21 at 4:30 pm to keakar
Tyranny pisses me off.
No standing bull shite.
No standing bull shite.
Posted on 9/23/21 at 4:34 pm to keakar
quote:
no standing
Someone please explain this to me like I’m a recently-formed gamete.
Posted on 9/23/21 at 4:38 pm to DotBling
quote:
Judge
Who remains nameless in the article posted. Shitty arse reporting again on display here.
Posted on 9/23/21 at 4:39 pm to NineLineBind
quote:
no standing
Someone please explain this to me like I’m a recently-formed gamete.
thats the term judges use when they decide to rule contrary to established law and the constitution
its judge speak for frick you we dont care about your rights
Posted on 9/23/21 at 4:39 pm to NineLineBind
quote:
Someone please explain this to me like I’m a recently-formed gamete.
Usually means the judge suffers from LMF
Lack of Moral Fiber
Posted on 9/23/21 at 4:42 pm to keakar
quote:
thats the term judges use when they decide to rule contrary to established law and the constitution
its judge speak for frick you we dont care about your rights
Right.
If THESE people don’t have standing in THIS situation, then I can’t see how anyone ever does have standing.
Posted on 9/23/21 at 4:43 pm to Homesick Tiger
It’s a local state district court judge.
Posted on 9/23/21 at 4:45 pm to NineLineBind
Standing has nothing to do with this case. The hospitals are private employers and are free to mandate conditions of employment in an at-will state.
He followed the law. An activist judge would have looked beyond the law. If the legislature wants to outlaw vax mandates from private employers then that is their prerogative to do so.
He followed the law. An activist judge would have looked beyond the law. If the legislature wants to outlaw vax mandates from private employers then that is their prerogative to do so.
This post was edited on 9/23/21 at 4:46 pm
Posted on 9/23/21 at 4:46 pm to keakar
quote:
no standing
That means the judge and the court don't feel like making a decision!
Judges are as corrupt as the politicians, or more!!!!!
Posted on 9/23/21 at 4:46 pm to DotBling
That's bullshite. The law is clearly on the plaintiffs' side.
Posted on 9/23/21 at 4:46 pm to oldskule
No standing here is literally fake news. But don’t like that stop you from getting worked up.
Posted on 9/23/21 at 4:47 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:yep
Standing has nothing to do with this case. The hospitals are private employers and are free to mandate conditions of employment in an at-will state.
He followed the law. An activist judge would have looked beyond the law. If the legislature wants to outlaw vax mandates from private employers then that is their prerogative to do so.
Posted on 9/23/21 at 4:47 pm to udtiger
You read the briefing?
Posted on 9/23/21 at 4:48 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
He followed the law. An activist judge would have looked beyond the law. If the legislature wants to outlaw vax mandates from private employers then that is their prerogative to do so.
It's not that simple. Mandatory healthcare is a civil rights violation.
Can an employer require his employees to murder people because it's an at-will state?
Posted on 9/23/21 at 4:49 pm to DotBling
Absolutely no details in that article. 
Posted on 9/23/21 at 4:49 pm to boosiebadazz
If it was anything similar to the legal arguments set forth in the letter, it should have been a slam dunk.
At will is what it is, but the law is clear you cannot fire someone for an illegal reason.
At will is what it is, but the law is clear you cannot fire someone for an illegal reason.
Posted on 9/23/21 at 4:49 pm to Stingray
It’s not mandatory. They are free to refuse the vaccine. They are then free to work somewhere else. You don’t have a vested property interest in your job in an at-will state.
Page 1 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News