- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge orders Trump administration to halt indiscriminate immigration stops
Posted on 7/14/25 at 5:45 am to soonerinlOUisiana
Posted on 7/14/25 at 5:45 am to soonerinlOUisiana
quote:
No. But we have statistics that tell us when and where drunks are on the road,
We have stats that tell us hat parts of town have the most crime. We should allow random home searches there!!!
1
Posted on 7/14/25 at 5:48 am to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
One of these guys openly admitted to running to chatGPT for arguments after being called out for describing Indianapolis v Edmund as “a state law about open containers”.
And why not! LOL The invention of the internet for many people has meant never having for actually form an idea of their own!!!
Of course, this renders them entirely incapable of having a serious conversation in person.
Posted on 7/14/25 at 10:02 am to Grumpy Nemesis
No. And now you’re moving the goalposts. I’m definitely ok with stop-and-frisk on public streets and sidewalks, though.
Posted on 7/14/25 at 12:13 pm to Grumpy Nemesis
quote:
But, it DOES apply to the 50 cars you stopped BEFORE you caught an illegal alien
I've said this multiple times in this thread - stopping a car is not a 4 th violation-period.
However - if the stop is not based on something then everything after - search and seizure will be excluded
Way too many pages for this easy analysis
Posted on 7/14/25 at 12:16 pm to Grumpy Nemesis
quote:
One of these guys openly admitted to running to chatGPT for arguments after being called out for describing Indianapolis v Edmund as “a state law about open containers”.
Actually that was me - and I tried it because it's free on Duck and thought it was easier than reading the opinion.
However the actual opinion supports stopping to check illegal status - and yet we are here 8 pages later and no need to mention stirs again because that is not an illegal case .
Posted on 7/14/25 at 6:11 pm to dafif
quote:Indianapolis versus Edmonds is regarding roadblocks. Not standard traffic stops. And frankly even then it's a complete shite decision that fortunately Rhenquist and Clarence Thomas had the good sense to say so
However the actual opinion supports stopping to check illegal status - and yet we are here 8 pages later and no need to mention stirs again because that is not an illegal case .
Posted on 7/14/25 at 6:22 pm to Grumpy Nemesis
Show us your posts saying that Biden and his dim-marxist handlers were wrong to allow twenty million illegals in without vetting.
The illegals have been told to self deport without penalty and remain eligible for legal immigration. A small percentage have complied.
Many blue states are actively resisting efforts by ICE.
If there are problems, they were caused by the left. We are in a crisis.
The illegals have been told to self deport without penalty and remain eligible for legal immigration. A small percentage have complied.
Many blue states are actively resisting efforts by ICE.
If there are problems, they were caused by the left. We are in a crisis.
This post was edited on 7/14/25 at 6:29 pm
Page 9 of 9
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News