- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge issues arrest warrant for @lascanner
Posted on 6/10/25 at 8:42 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 6/10/25 at 8:42 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:So I can vector rioters into a location knowing the agents are there. Reasonable people would know exactly why I was vectoring violent mobs into the location.
If the ICE officers are seen in public and that information is relayed to third parties, then public.
1
Posted on 6/10/25 at 8:48 am to Jbird
quote:
So I can vector rioters
Now you're adding another layer/action to what I said
The more of these layers you add on this wavelength, the closer you'll get to criminality (by design)
Posted on 6/10/25 at 8:52 am to SlowFlowPro
He knowingly aided a violent mob, seems like he might have some issues.
Posted on 6/10/25 at 9:05 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Did he post actual threats or just names and objective, public information?
I didn't follow this saga
It's simple, most people itt think we only have rights in times of peace. If you don't have rights in times of turmoil you don't have rights at all.
Posted on 6/10/25 at 9:20 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm trying to protect those guardrails, specifically the 1st Amendment.
You are trying to expand the guardrails to fit your wants. It’s been clear in this thread what people are wanting him penalized for, and you keep hoping for him to get out on top.
Doxxing with intent to do harm isn’t a 1A benefit.
Posted on 6/10/25 at 9:39 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Tell me counselor, does broadcasting the location of an ICE raid fall under confidential or public?
quote:
If the ICE officers are seen in public and that information is relayed to third parties, then public.
He has a police scanner. Would it be a reasonable assumption that he received the majority of the locations of raids through the scanner, or from the public? If not, what was he even using the scanning for?
Posted on 6/10/25 at 9:45 am to HagaDaga
quote:
It’s been clear in this thread what people are wanting him penalized for,
Yes, which is scary how fast people turn on the 1A if that would hurt their perceived out-group.
That's why, despite how unpopular it is (given the above), it makes it even more important for people who believe in freedom to defend the 1A.
quote:
Doxxing with intent to do harm isn’t a 1A benefit.
Again, you're adding layers to what I said, specifically the "with intent to do harm".
Posted on 6/10/25 at 9:46 am to SouthEndzoneTiger
The scanner is its own separate issue with its own separate statute.
Posted on 6/10/25 at 10:08 am to SlowFlowPro
But could/should his actions be seen as aiding and abetting rioters? I imagine it could be hard to prove intent in a court, but if he was spreading this info after some of the riots had started and become news, I think he should have been aware that this was a likely outcome.
Maybe they just need to get him on the use of scanner and maybe other stuff, if they can't make the 'aiding and abetting' stick.
wiki says (my bold):
So maybe he can claim he was posting so people could peacefully protest, they may need to find posting that encourage violence to get him on that?
Maybe they just need to get him on the use of scanner and maybe other stuff, if they can't make the 'aiding and abetting' stick.
wiki says (my bold):
quote:
Aiding and abetting is a legal doctrine related to the guilt of someone who aids or abets (encourages, incites) another person in the commission of a crime (or in another's suicide).
So maybe he can claim he was posting so people could peacefully protest, they may need to find posting that encourage violence to get him on that?
Posted on 6/10/25 at 10:09 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This is probably not going to survive scrutiny if that's all they did.
Posted on 6/10/25 at 10:10 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Yes, which is scary how fast people turn on the 1A
Why do you keep suggesting this is what his alleged crime is or what anyone here is even saying? Nowhere in here have I seen anything close to people saying they are anti free speech, comrade. You now know and have admitted that his transgressions fall outside your "little slice of the pie" so why are you still trying to go back to 1A protections?
This post was edited on 6/10/25 at 10:12 am
Posted on 6/10/25 at 10:10 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The scanner is its own separate issue with its own separate statute.
No, no, I'm not talking about the scanner being illegal for him to possess and use, I'm talking about how he received the locations of ICE raids. Did he use the scanner to obtain them or did he exclusively get their locations from third parties notifying him, thus making it "public" information, as you put it. Which is more likely?
Posted on 6/10/25 at 10:12 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
quote:
This is probably not going to survive scrutiny if that's all they did.
As per typical, you will be wrong.
But he sure wishes and hopes it is "not going to survive scrutiny," because he supports the scumbag and anyone opposed to the Trump admin.
The TDS is crazy.
Posted on 6/10/25 at 10:13 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
As per typical, you will be wrong.
The irony of being completely wrong
Yes. Exactly. Exactly what you just said.
Posted on 6/10/25 at 10:14 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Yes, which is scary how fast people turn on the 1A
Yeah, like arresting someone for a meme.
Posted on 6/10/25 at 10:20 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Imagine that Slowflow defending the hard left
Always... with no hesitation. But he's totes conservative/Libertarian, y'all.
Posted on 6/10/25 at 10:21 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
Imagine that Slowflow defending the hard left
I'm not
I'm defending the Constitution,
Posted on 6/10/25 at 10:21 am to MidWestGuy
quote:
But could/should his actions be seen as aiding and abetting rioters?
If all he's doing is posting publicly-available information? No.
Otherwise it would also be illegal to notify the public when a cop is shooting radar or where a DWI checkpoint is.
quote:
I imagine it could be hard to prove intent in a court,
You can see my post earlier to Jbird about the layers
Calls to action and certain guidance will get you closer to that intent. That's beyond what I posted, though. The more you add on that wavelength, the closer to criminality you will be.
quote:
So maybe he can claim he was posting so people could peacefully protest,
Or to AVOID LEO, etc.
Now if he says "ICE IS AT 7TH AND MAIN GO GET EM!" clearly that is a different scenario entirely and a different discussion. That's the "added layers" I referenced above.
Posted on 6/10/25 at 10:22 am to BTROleMisser
quote:
But he sure wishes and hopes it is "not going to survive scrutiny," because he supports the scumbag and anyone opposed to the Trump admin.
Your SFPDS is crazy
Posted on 6/10/25 at 10:24 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Otherwise it would also be illegal to notify the public when a cop is shooting radar or where a DWI checkpoint is.
Nice false equivalency. In many states law enforcement is required to announce where they will be ahead of time.
Immigration enforcement is not, as we all know (including you).
The fact that you keep going to the mat for these nutjobs is telling and almost impressive in terms of how ridiculous you are. Any time a scumbag leftist acts out, you can bet your paycheck SFP will be here with "well, lets talk about the part I think I can defend"
This post was edited on 6/10/25 at 10:27 am
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News