- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge Ellis slams Mueller "star witness may not testify"
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:29 pm to JuiceTerry
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:29 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Correct, STDBrokenclock
So you are admitting you are retarded?
Bold strategy cotton
0
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:29 pm to BBONDS25
quote:Lol Are you really suggesting Gates has nothing? His knowledge is the entire defense strategy.
If Gates has any evidence, he would be used.
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:30 pm to brian_wilson
quote:
n 2016, for bank fraud, 920 defends were found guilty and 8 were found guilty.
That's 928 total guilty, braniac.
Don't forget the TDS influence here as well.
This post was edited on 8/1/18 at 1:31 pm
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:31 pm to Jjdoc
quote:Was that in presence of the jury?
That’s news to me and about 25 others who scurried out of here like rats on a sinking ship,” Judge Ellis shot back.
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:31 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:Then why wouldn't Honest Bob's henchmen use such a deadly weapon?
Lol Are you really suggesting Gates has nothing?
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:32 pm to Jbird
Don't bother. Juice knows more about putting on evidence than a former prosecutor (bbonds).
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:32 pm to upgrayedd
I forgot a not. Based on trump's previous action, that is totally cool. 
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:33 pm to Jbird
quote:
Then why wouldn't Honest Bob's henchmen use such a deadly weapon?
AUSA said it was to speed the trial along.
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:33 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
They bluffed the defense into making their whole case about Gates
you act like this is some brilliant strategy but if Gates doesn't testify, Manafort's attorneys have an "empty chair" to point at
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:34 pm to NIH
quote:Pretty sad when you think about it
uice knows more about putting on evidence than a former prosecutor (bbonds).
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:34 pm to JuiceTerry
I'm suggesting Gates has no evidence valuable to the Prosecution. If he did, they would call him.
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:35 pm to brian_wilson
quote:
AUSA said it was to speed the trial along.
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Why not just call Gates?
you act like this is some brilliant strategy but if Gates doesn't testify, Manafort's attorneys have an "empty chair" to point at
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:36 pm to JuiceTerry
Well no, your assertion is retarded. A litigator wouldn't leave importantchips on the table because he thinks he has enough. Especially in a case like this. Do you know the standard for criminal convictions?
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:36 pm to brian_wilson
quote:
AUSA said it was to speed the trial along.
Ummmmmmm
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:36 pm to brian_wilson
So you don't think this trial could possibly be the result of an overzealous prosecution?
I think the feds might have taken a gamble here to get Manafort to flip. Either look bad by dropping the charges or attempt to save face by going forward with trial?
I think the feds might have taken a gamble here to get Manafort to flip. Either look bad by dropping the charges or attempt to save face by going forward with trial?
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:36 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Why not, if he doesn't need him?
but they do need him
he's the guy who validates all their documentation against Manafort. who else had that kind of access to the inner-workings of this enterprise?
make no mistake, i think Manafort is guilty as all hell, but Gates is the guy who seals that win. they MAY not need him, but no attorney worth an ounce of quality will make the assumption that they can win without their literal key witness
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:36 pm to BBONDS25
Is this the venue were Manafort can make the case that Mueller's prosecution is unconstitutional via the appointments clause?
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:37 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Lol Are you really suggesting Gates has nothing? His knowledge is the entire defense strategy.
lol, if they dont call him none of his knowledge is usable.
giod you filth are fricking stupid.
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:37 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:Well, if he doesn't testify the jury will never know what he knows.
Lol Are you really suggesting Gates has nothing?
quote:If the entire defense strategy was to debunk the testimony of the KEY witness and the KEY witness doesn't testify, that sounds like a pretty damn good strategy to me.
His knowledge is the entire defense strateg
Page 4 of 12
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News