Started By
Message

re: Judge Boasberg 4pm hearing demanding answers from Trump Adm: ACLU filing of VZ gang

Posted on 3/17/25 at 9:19 pm to
Posted by Grumpy Nemesis
Member since Feb 2025
2033 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 9:19 pm to
You can cite Marbury versus Madison all you fricking want. Most people accept the idea that Supreme Court can hold the position of judicial review but no rational person honestly fricking feels like that goes all the way down to every single individual lower court judge. Not even you're this fricking stupid
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135190 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 9:23 pm to
quote:

I just can see all the ways the DEMs will abuse this, if it's ruled legal.
Abuse what?

Are you saying Democrat Administrations will ignore a stampede of right-wing extremist judge TROs targeting democrat POTUS's?
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
111949 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 9:30 pm to
quote:

Most people accept the idea that Supreme Court can hold the position of judicial review but no rational person honestly fricking feels like that goes all the way down to every single individual lower court judge. Not even you're this fricking stupid


The co-equal branches are:

President (Executive)
Congress (Legislative)
SCOTUS (Judicial)

To say a district court judge has the authority they are trying to exercise (i.e., co-equal to the President) is the equivalent of a member of Congress claiming co-equal authority.
Posted by Grumpy Nemesis
Member since Feb 2025
2033 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 10:01 pm to
quote:

To say a district court judge has the authority they are trying to exercise (i.e., co-equal to the President) is the equivalent of a member of Congress claiming co-equal authority.



That's what I've been saying.

1. It is exactly like claiming you don't need congress as a body to act, just one schmo is all that's necessary.

2. If you actually argue that 1 lower judge has that power, you're actually arguing lower federal judges, on their own, are MORE powerful than any single judge in an Appellate Court of the Supreme Court. I mean frick. You can't just go cherry pick Thomas or Sotamayor as the case may be to get a ruling!!!
Posted by Mr Cell Phone
Member since Nov 2021
1265 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 10:11 pm to
Trying to take the law into there own hands by a bunch of crazy bigots whst is next no trials just convict the law does not change for fir cult members
Posted by jamboybarry
Member since Feb 2011
33137 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

Trying to take the law into there own hands by a bunch of crazy bigots whst is next no trials just convict the law does not change for fir cult members


Are you legit retarded? Serious question
Posted by Speckhunter2012
Lake Charles
Member since Dec 2012
8111 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 10:19 pm to
quote:

Are you legit retarded? Serious question


The Cell Phone NPC is definitely stoned or worse.
Posted by TigerCoon
Member since Nov 2005
22446 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 10:36 pm to
the answer should be *crickets*.

This tool deserves no response.
Posted by TigerCoon
Member since Nov 2005
22446 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 10:37 pm to
This guy is one of the stupidest regulars on this board.

Don't look for a reasonable response.
Posted by duckblind56
South of Ellick
Member since Sep 2023
4289 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 11:06 pm to
Yep. These fricking clowns think anyone give a shite
Posted by Redbone
my castle
Member since Sep 2012
20529 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 11:20 pm to
quote:

Trying to take the law into there own hands by a bunch of crazy bigots whst is next no trials just convict the law does not change for fir cult members
This was hard to reed.

R u a bot that cain't spel too gud?
Posted by Redbone
my castle
Member since Sep 2012
20529 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 11:25 pm to
quote:

This guy is one of the stupidest regulars on this board.
He/she/it should be embarrassed beyond measure because of sentence structure.

If his/her/it's responses is an indication of I.Q. he/she/it is at about short bus window licker level.
Posted by Redbone
my castle
Member since Sep 2012
20529 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 11:27 pm to
quote:

Do what, exactly?
Playing stupid fits you well.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 12:34 am to
quote:

legally DJT has enacted Alien Enemies Act which gives him the power
Are you trying to say "invoked?"
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 12:39 am to
quote:

Justice takes precedence over procedure.
"Law" takes precedence over some amorphous concept of "justice" in Anglo-American courts, because one is objective and the other is completely subjective.
quote:

There is a story that two of the greatest figures in our law, Justice Holmes and Judge Learned Hand, had lunch together and afterward, as Holmes began to drive off in his carriage, Hand, in a sudden onset of enthusiasm, ran after him, crying, "Do justice, sir, do justice." Holmes stopped the carriage and reproved Hand: "That is not my job. It is my job to apply the law."
Holmes was correct.
Posted by ole man
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
16522 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 4:03 am to
This knuckle head is nor different that any of the other CNN goons, always interupts never listens to an answer,they love hearing themselves talk,and in this instance proof of her ignorance is in the interview itself
Posted by ole man
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
16522 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 4:11 am to
Jesus dude can you frickin read, I'm just a dumb coon arse on the Bayou that got that Question, and your reply is "exactly what." I could go on about how stupid that reply was, but it doesn't warrant my time typing a long arse explanation of how frickin stupid you are.
Posted by Strannix
C.S.A.
Member since Dec 2012
52736 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 4:24 am to
Laches, no standing
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135190 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 5:24 am to
quote:

Trying to take the law into there own hands by a bunch of crazy bigots whst is next no trials just convict the law does not change for fir cult members
It's like scattered lines from a poem ...

Trying to take the law into there,
but where, I do not know.
Perhaps to spaces with crosses they bear,
not yet 'unburdened' though.

own hands
for cotton, sugar, rice, some were sold,
by a bunch of crazy bigots
from plantations in days of old.

whst is next
after the whim and wher genders.
no trials just convict
carping girls flashed with trans' 'timber.'

the law does not change for fir
trees, or spotted owls, environmentalists rock.
cult members
yes they are, a genuinely crazy flock.

Cell Phone's lines are glimpses of fragmented thought
from a train in a brain that derailment brought.
This post was edited on 3/18/25 at 7:14 am
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
141137 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 5:26 am to
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram