- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge blocks 3 agencies from disclosing troves of sensitive personal data to DOGE
Posted on 3/25/25 at 5:46 am to DefCon1
Posted on 3/25/25 at 5:46 am to DefCon1
quote:
I agree with others who have pointed out that these activist judges are involved in a conspiracy to obstruct President Trump from carrying out his duties under Article II. They have conspired with liberal politicians and liberal organizations. The RICO statutes should come into play here. DOJ needs to conduct an investigation and issue subpoenas for all the communications between these groups.
I'm sure these judges aren't doing this for nothing. Some, if not all, surely are receiving payment in some form or fashion. If it's cash, that's probably taking place using offshore accounts.... seems like if the DOJ/FBI began snooping around they'd find something.
2
Posted on 3/25/25 at 7:02 am to lake chuck fan
quote:
I'm sure these judges aren't doing this for nothing. Some, if not all, surely are receiving payment in some form or fashion. If it's cash, that's probably taking place using offshore accounts.... seems like if the DOJ/FBI began snooping around they'd find something
This is where the spouses and children come in.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 7:08 am to Meauxjeaux
quote:
just need the metadata and the EIN
This has NOTHING to do with "employee privacy"
Posted on 3/25/25 at 7:18 am to The Maj
The Maj is correct. It is pitiful that some
Self--important, unelected narcissist is seeking personal information about private citizens.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 7:32 am to Jbird
They didn’t complain when Obama set up DOGE.
Posted on 3/27/25 at 12:31 pm to the808bass
quote:
They didn’t complain when Obama set up DOGE.
I see you often say dumb shite out loud, but this is the first time I've seen you openly reveal you should be ignored outright
Posted on 3/27/25 at 12:34 pm to PhtevenWithaV
quote:
PhtevenWithaV
You should probably educate yourself before calling others dumb.
quote:
DOGE took over the U.S. Digital Service, a 300-person technology office President Barack Obama set up inside the Executive Office of the President in 2014 to fix his beleaguered HealthCare.gov. Bureaucrats had bungled the site, so USDS sought out Silicon Valley innovators, and was authorized to circumvent federal hiring procedures to get them. Hiring young people from the tech world and putting them together to work for Obama, unmoored from the stuffy rules of a typical government building, led to an environment of overt left-wing advocacy.
Posted on 3/27/25 at 12:35 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
receiving payment in some form or fashion
Their wives, brothers, sisters, parents or children are benefiting financially from their actions... Pretty obvious when you pull on the string...
Posted on 3/27/25 at 12:39 pm to BugAC
You know damn good and well thats a gaslighting response, doge's scope and responsibilities has been drastically changed from when obama set it up.
Thank you for revealing i should ignore you outright as well. you and 808bass have done a ton to save me time today. I congratulate you both.
Thank you for revealing i should ignore you outright as well. you and 808bass have done a ton to save me time today. I congratulate you both.
Posted on 3/27/25 at 12:58 pm to PhtevenWithaV
quote:
You know damn good and well thats a gaslighting response
I don't think you know what gaslighting is.
quote:
doge's scope and responsibilities has been drastically changed from when obama set it up.
And? Obama literally setup the committee and gave it a scope per what he wanted. Trump took it and gave it the scope that he wanted. Why opposition to one and not the other?
quote:
Thank you for revealing i should ignore you outright as well. you and 808bass have done a ton to save me time today. I congratulate you both.
Oh no, random poster is here to announce to this thread that he will ignore me. You think i'll still be able to post, or do i lose interaction points because you don't like what i post?
Posted on 3/27/25 at 1:05 pm to BugAC
quote:
Trump took it and gave it the scope
Nothing else needs to be said, you've admitted that the old job and current job are entirely unrelated.
Why are you so fricking stupid dude?
Posted on 3/27/25 at 1:08 pm to PhtevenWithaV
quote:
Nothing else needs to be said, you've admitted that the old job and current job are entirely unrelated.
Again, educate yourself fool.
quote:
Obama designed it that way, making the USDS administrator, its top employee, a political appointee. When Donald Trump took over in 2017, he didn’t attempt to turn the tables. Instead, he turned the other cheek. He reclassified USDS’s top job as a career position, not a political one, signaling that he trusted the employees to simply carry out the unglamorous job of fixing government IT.
But USDS staff abused that trust, using it, incredibly, to run left-wing activism from inside Trump’s first White House. During his first term, it hired multiple people who had worked in the porn industry, one who’d worked in a gender studies department, and a transgender activist. USDS leadership subjected staff to memos lecturing them on “toxic masculinity” while devoting significant effort to DEI hiring, a Daily Wire review found.
This is the fun part about you not knowing the subject, and me being able to slow walk out the details after you make an arse of yourself.Posted on 3/27/25 at 1:09 pm to BugAC
Dude, you admitted you're a fricking moron. I don't need you to continue to prove my point, but thank you.
Posted on 3/27/25 at 1:11 pm to PhtevenWithaV
quote:
Dude, you admitted you're a fricking moron
Did I? I must have missed that sentence. Maybe you can quote it for me.
quote:
I don't need you to continue to prove my point, but thank you.
Apparently you do. Because you had no idea that Obama created DOGE in the first place.
Posted on 3/27/25 at 1:18 pm to BugAC
I'd like for you to go back and reread your replies before you reply again. Don't worry about telling me you reread your replies. I'll know you did when you edit them and then never reply in this thread again. When you reply telling me you did and continue to look like a moron I'll know you didn't.
Posted on 3/27/25 at 1:28 pm to PhtevenWithaV
quote:
I'd like for you to go back and reread your replies before you reply again. Don't worry about telling me you reread your replies. I'll know you did when you edit them and then never reply in this thread again. When you reply telling me you did and continue to look like a moron I'll know you didn't.
Well i'll reread my replies when i reply to your replies of my replied that i replied to you whilst replying to others that replied to your reply.
Posted on 3/27/25 at 1:31 pm to PhtevenWithaV
quote:
PhtevenWithaV
This may help you...
LINK
quote:
The United States Digital Service is a startup at the White House that pairs the country’s top technology talent with the best public servants, to improve the usefulness and reliability of the country’s most important digital services.
…what we realized was that we could potentially build a SWAT team, a world-class technology office inside of the government that was helping agencies. We’ve dubbed that the U.S. Digital Service…they are making an enormous difference…
That was the mission, initially. Then they went woke, started hiring from the porn industry and the transgender industry and it went to shite.
Trump took it, transformed it back to the initial mission statement of "to improve the usefulness and reliability of the country’s most important digital services" but expanded it to not only digital services but all services.
You apparently, loved it when Obama did it, but Trump has made it a useful tool to cut waste and provide accountability and your little progressive panties are in a bunch.
Posted on 3/27/25 at 1:33 pm to Jbird
quote:
U.S. District Judge Deborah Boardman
Is either receiving back-door funds that DOGE is threatening to cut off or a member of her family is.
Posted on 3/27/25 at 1:36 pm to PhtevenWithaV
Drastically changed like stripping a bill and making it Obamacare to circumvent the House?
Posted on 3/27/25 at 1:41 pm to Jbird
Cool. Just delete all accounts and names. Trust me, you'll hear exactly who isn't getting their payments....simple
And the illegal fraud won't call to complain
And the illegal fraud won't call to complain
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News