- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge Awards Andy Ngo $300k
Posted on 8/22/23 at 11:09 pm to Rabby
Posted on 8/22/23 at 11:09 pm to Rabby
quote:
that one group doxxed which permitted the battery to be carried out by the second group.
You would have likely have had to prove that that was their intent. While it was, convincing others beyond a doubt would be more than difficult.
quote:
'spoiled rich kid'
Unfortunately, mommy and daddy's money does not count as income that could be garnished.
This post was edited on 8/22/23 at 11:13 pm
0
Posted on 8/23/23 at 5:37 am to shrevetigertom
Please stop engaging with FaggieHank and encouraging him to make more posts. Thanks.
Posted on 8/23/23 at 5:44 am to blueboy
So, no jail time? 100K is now the penalty for assault?
hmmm.... why are assault weapons so vilified?
hmmm.... why are assault weapons so vilified?
Posted on 8/23/23 at 6:08 am to Havoc
These are just some of the comrades of Celticprog, Maograth, Low-t, BamaAtl, Texdiddler, Decayed terd, LooneyfromLA, Judge Holdem, and Hank.
Posted on 8/23/23 at 9:04 am to jimmy the leg
pussy looking motherfrickers
Posted on 8/23/23 at 9:29 am to shrevetigertom
quote:Retired these days. Started in a glass tower, doing complex business litigation and eventually getting myself a corner office. Set aside enough to move home to the ranch and hang a small-town shingle, doing mostly family law. Now, playing with my daughters and watching the cattle wander around.
Out of curiosity Hank, what type of law do you practice?
This post was edited on 8/23/23 at 9:36 am
Posted on 8/23/23 at 9:32 am to dafif
quote:I kinda see your point, but the INTENTIONAL tort is probably the deciding element, IMO.
I would argue that foreseeability (Palsgraf) is much greater for doxxing resulting in people going to the address and causing harm than a truck going down the road and having a car fly through the median from the opposite direction somehow being the trucks fault.
Again, of course, I have trouble seeing a lot of liability on even the negligence. But plaintiff's lawyers (I was never one) tend to have trouble accepting that there is any such thing as an unforeseeable accident.
Posted on 8/23/23 at 9:34 am to RedCali714
quote:You really HATE the intellectual beatdowns, don't you?
Please stop engaging with FaggieHank and encouraging him to make more posts.
Posted on 8/23/23 at 10:23 am to AggieHank86
when you win one we will let you know
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News