- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: John Bolton indicted
Posted on 10/17/25 at 11:47 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 10/17/25 at 11:47 am to SlowFlowPro
Ok then be honest, do you believe that you debate in good faith? You don't think you engage in subterfuge and speak as ambiguously as possible, because you aren't here to contribute, you're here to correct, condescend, and feel like you won?
2
Posted on 10/17/25 at 11:48 am to GRTiger
You can answer your own question very easily. How often have you seen the a-hole drag threads off topic? All the time. He is a paid contributor.
Posted on 10/17/25 at 11:49 am to AlterEd
quote:
You can answer your own question very easily
Everyone can. I'm specifically interested in his response, though.
Posted on 10/17/25 at 11:49 am to GRTiger
quote:
do you believe that you debate in good faith?
Yes.
quote:
You don't think you engage in subterfuge and speak as ambiguously as possible,
I'm not one of the conspiracy crowd field, so no.
quote:
because you aren't here to contribute, you're here to correct, condescend, and feel like you won?
I do correct often because there is so much stupidity on here, amplified by certain events (MAGA rising, twitter embeds, etc.)
Posted on 10/17/25 at 11:50 am to Prettyboy Floyd
Thank-You for catching him on something. I honestly lack patience for his foolishness to fully show when his mask slips.
If others have it in them to catch him, please do.
it is delightful to see.
If others have it in them to catch him, please do.
it is delightful to see.Posted on 10/17/25 at 11:50 am to SlowFlowPro
Thanks
Posted on 10/17/25 at 11:51 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Typically when people rely on "common sense" as the standard, it's at least bordering on idiotic, because other standards (like logic, objectivity, etc.) aren't options, apparently.
But..."common sense" is defined by "logic and objectivity". I dunno what oddball standard you're using to define "common sense".
quote:
when you phrase it with "rage and obsession". Those are bad things.
I should have put "unreasonable" in quotation marks. I thought you'd understand the context without them.
Rage and obsession after several years of justice NOT served is not "unreasonable"; especially when considering the extent and degree of being wronged for so long.
So...you are saying were not a fan and advocate of 0bama admin policies and practice?
If not, I apologize for the mistaken presumption.
This post was edited on 10/17/25 at 11:53 am
Posted on 10/17/25 at 11:52 am to AlterEd
I love when you talk about sock puppets. Exactly what is a sock puppet?
Posted on 10/17/25 at 11:53 am to cajunangelle
Speaking of trying to drag threads off topic. What are you even talking about?
Posted on 10/17/25 at 11:54 am to AlterEd
Let BoarEd use the computer.
Posted on 10/17/25 at 11:54 am to GRTiger
quote:damn I found something I agree with Roger on
just like everyone's dumb to Roger.
Posted on 10/17/25 at 11:54 am to EphesianArmor
quote:
I should have put "unreasonable" in quotation marks. I thought you'd understand the context without them.
He doesn't infer or use intuition. Because he wants to catch people saying something wrong. And he'll decide what you meant (and it's always the dumbest interpretation of your words) so as to tell you how wrong you are.
It's the most absurd way to communicate, but as we've just learned, he is completely oblivious to it.
Posted on 10/17/25 at 11:55 am to GRTiger
You nailed it.
Posted on 10/17/25 at 11:56 am to EphesianArmor
quote:
But..."common sense" is defined by "logic and objectivity".
Typically not in reality.
A great example is the "crime is getting worse" discussion.
quote:
I dunno what oddball standard you're using to define "common sense".
I am not sure because it's used so poorly by so many on here when they can't rely on reality, good data, logic, or objectivity.
You're asking the wrong guy. I'm the "data-logic (no emotions)" guy, not the reject data because I feel differently" guy who defaults to "common sense" as a crutch.
quote:
I should have put "unreasonable" in quotation marks. I thought you'd understand the context without them.
There is no such thing as reasonable rage in the context of formulating a response.
Very few, if any for obsession. I'd have to think about that in more detail.
quote:
Rage and obsession after several years of justice NOT served is "unreasonable";
They're still bad.
quote:
were not a fan and advocate of 0bama admin policies and practice?
Uh yeah. I think the only policy I praised him on was his policy to normalize relations with Cuba.
Posted on 10/17/25 at 11:57 am to GRTiger
quote:
He doesn't infer or use intuition. Because he wants to catch people saying something wrong. And he'll decide what you meant (and it's always the dumbest interpretation of your words) so as to tell you how wrong you are.
You made a prediction that failed 2 posts later
Posted on 10/17/25 at 11:57 am to cajunangelle
quote:he’d have to take off the roll of tin foil wrapped around his head to view the monitor. He needs to keep those beautiful brainwaves safe from any nefarious attacks.
Let BoarEd use the computer.
Posted on 10/17/25 at 11:57 am to cajunangelle
I've never cared for the strategy to seem incredibly stupid in order to prove how smart you are. Half the time I read his responses, I incredulously wonder if he really interpreted the thing he's responding to like he's implying.
Posted on 10/17/25 at 11:58 am to GRTiger
quote:
He doesn't infer or use intuition
Otherwise known as autism.
Posted on 10/17/25 at 11:59 am to SuperSaint
quote:
he’d have to take off the roll of tin foil wrapped around his head to view the monitor. He needs to keep those beautiful brainwaves safe from any nefarious attacks.
Does anyone else ever stop and think about how counterproductive this would be? The ancient prophets used to wrap their heads in wool. Probably a better idea.
Posted on 10/17/25 at 11:59 am to GRTiger
quote:you think he has to go bait and search?
Because he wants to catch people saying something wrong. And he'll decide what you meant (and it's always the dumbest interpretation of your words) so as to tell you how wrong you are.
you can’t click on a thread around here without reading some rtarded take. 
Page 9 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News