- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/17/25 at 12:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
You said nothing.
I didn’t ask as you know “ hey slo did they really have their heart in Russia gate? Did they really mean it? We’re they sincere about trying to ruin Trump? I didn’t know sincere was important to this occurrence but you seem to be hanging your hat on it.
SLO
Sincere? No.
Goodness SLO
I didn’t ask as you know “ hey slo did they really have their heart in Russia gate? Did they really mean it? We’re they sincere about trying to ruin Trump? I didn’t know sincere was important to this occurrence but you seem to be hanging your hat on it.
SLO
Sincere? No.
Goodness SLO
Posted on 10/17/25 at 12:48 pm to goatmilker
quote:
I didn’t ask as you know “ hey slo did they really have their heart in Russia gate? Did they really mean it? We’re they sincere about trying to ruin Trump?
Already addressed
quote:
Justified required you to further define. I gave one path, but I phrased it as a question to permit you to refine it as you intended. Giving you the option to refine your comment, while still commenting one possibility, is not as you described in the initial quote above.
quote:
Your ability to refine that is still open, FWIW.
quote:
I didn’t know sincere was important to this occurrence but you seem to be hanging your hat on it.
Again, already addressed
quote:
I gave one path
Posted on 10/17/25 at 12:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
You could have just said “whatever”. It would have been shorter.
Posted on 10/17/25 at 12:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What a contortion of what I said
Ok, You DON’T imply that Trump is engaging in blind, raw vengeance for vengeance sake?
I guess I got it wrong.
Posted on 10/17/25 at 12:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
At the time? Care to link that? Because I keep asking for it. Hell I was just asking for specifics on that angle prior to Trump's latest election.
Sorry, not the government of Iran. As well all know, he's wanted to overthrow their government for a long time. More specifically, his ties to the terror group known as the MEK. What I'm interested to find out is if he was passing classified information along to terrorist organizations within Iran, subverting diplomatic relations with Iran. That's my guess as to where this may be going, among no telling where else he was passing the information along to.
Link it? Nah, find it yourself. As I said, it was speculated by some following all of this at the time. I'm not digging back 7+ years through anon speculation to show you shite. I find you to be contemptible.
This post was edited on 10/17/25 at 1:04 pm
Posted on 10/17/25 at 1:10 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:Hell, the acolytes on here were praising Trump’s hiring of Bolton as 11 degree chess for alooong time.
Why is Trump's DOJ messing with a white hat?
Posted on 10/17/25 at 1:36 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Ok, You DON’T imply that Trump is engaging in blind, raw vengeance for vengeance sake?
Where was Trump mentioned at all in that discussion?
I made comments about the board and she asked me a question about me.
Nobody was discussing, or hinting at a discussion of, Trump
Posted on 10/17/25 at 1:38 pm to AlterEd
When you said "at the time" are you talking the 2018 Q posts or the 2025 raid?
My response to you was within the timeframe of the 2018 posts.
The common recipient discussed at the time of the raid was Qatar, not Iran, IIRC. That speculation, whether Iran or Qatar, isn't relevant to what I was speaking of, though.
My response to you was within the timeframe of the 2018 posts.
The common recipient discussed at the time of the raid was Qatar, not Iran, IIRC. That speculation, whether Iran or Qatar, isn't relevant to what I was speaking of, though.
Posted on 10/17/25 at 2:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
You're dodging the question.
yes or no.
yes or no.
Posted on 10/17/25 at 4:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
"The hand of Vengeance found the bed
To which the Purple Tyrant fled;
The iron hand crush’d the Tyrant’s head
And became a Tyrant in his stead.”
To which the Purple Tyrant fled;
The iron hand crush’d the Tyrant’s head
And became a Tyrant in his stead.”
Posted on 10/17/25 at 5:11 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
You're dodging the question.
yes or no.
asking a lawyer to do this
Oh you sweet summer childPosted on 10/17/25 at 5:46 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
You're dodging the question.
yes or no.
I didn't dodge. The answer is "No"
As was CLEARLY stated
quote:
Nobody was discussing, or hinting at a discussion of, Trump
This post was edited on 10/17/25 at 5:47 pm
Posted on 10/18/25 at 3:09 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Posted on 10/18/25 at 3:52 pm to cajunangelle
It’s always the same cast of characters…
Page 12 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News