- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Joe Kent just potentially derailed prosecutor case against Kirk assassin
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:04 pm to AlterEd
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:04 pm to AlterEd
quote:
You have no clue if this is true or not.
I do not. A judge will by the time they get close to a trial
What possible evidence could this guy bring that is admissable?
3
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:05 pm to AlterEd
Yes. I do.
We know he leaked the texts.
Why would he leak those and not other evidence?
You don’t know. You just hope it’s true.
Because you’re a dumb fig.
We know he leaked the texts.
Why would he leak those and not other evidence?
You don’t know. You just hope it’s true.
Because you’re a dumb fig.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:05 pm to tigerlion
quote:
Lol. Same. There’s no way.
Why?
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:05 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
What possible evidence could this guy bring that is admissable?
He was the head of Counter Intelligence. He knows where Jimmy Hoffa’s body is.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:07 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
What possible evidence could this guy bring that is admissable?
That would be what the trial and his testimony is for, would it not?
Seriously, you people sound completely anti-American here. You're arguing to removing a person's rights to due process.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:07 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Who?
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:08 pm to the808bass
quote:
Because you’re a dumb fig.
Ad hom. You have no argument and you know it.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:08 pm to the808bass
Are you Jewish? You seem to be taking this all incredibly personal. Lmao.
I listened to him on Tucker and he was talking about how there were multiple people with foreknowledge of the shooting that should have been investigated but weren’t.
I listened to him on Tucker and he was talking about how there were multiple people with foreknowledge of the shooting that should have been investigated but weren’t.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:10 pm to ManBearSharkReb
quote:
he was talking about how there were multiple people with foreknowledge of the shooting that should have been investigated but weren’t.
They don't think that his position of head of counterintelligence would make him privy to these sorts of details. Instead he should be silenced at any cost.
This is anti-American, communist bullshite these people are arguing for.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:11 pm to ManBearSharkReb
I’m a replacement/covenant theology Evangelical. I don’t give a shite about Israel anymore than any other country.
I did listen to Candace Owen’s podcast for a couple of weeks. Once you hear the crazy, you can’t unhear it. And it gets amplified here like it’s the Sibylline Oracle (almost exactly).
I did listen to Candace Owen’s podcast for a couple of weeks. Once you hear the crazy, you can’t unhear it. And it gets amplified here like it’s the Sibylline Oracle (almost exactly).
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:12 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Instead he should be silenced at any cost.
Who on this board is taking that position?
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:13 pm to the808bass
quote:
Who on this board is taking that position?
Are you not even reading the fricking thread?
quote:
How would he testify if his testimony is inadmissible
There would be great harm in someone testifying that has no relevant information whatsoever that is verifiable or first hand to the crime itself
This post was edited on 3/24/26 at 1:15 pm
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:16 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
What possible evidence could this guy bring that is admissable?
You have to understand their concept of "admissible" within the context of their polluted "social media argument" mindset.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:16 pm to AlterEd
quote:
There would be great harm in someone testifying that has no relevant information whatsoever that is verifiable or first hand to the crime itself
Are you arguing he should testify even if he doesn’t have relevant evidence?
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:17 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
What a colossal scorned ex gf.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:17 pm to the808bass
quote:
Are you arguing he should testify even if he doesn’t have relevant evidence?
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:18 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
frick this guy with a bag of aids dicks!
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:18 pm to the808bass
quote:
Are you arguing he should testify even if he doesn’t have relevant evidence?
Are you, like the other idiot, just assuming that whatever he has to say will not be relevant? And therefore he shouldn't testify?
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:19 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Are you, like the other idiot, just assuming that whatever he has to say will not be relevant?
Did you even read the words you quoted or did you just interpret and dot connect?
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:19 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Are you, like the other idiot, just assuming that whatever he has to say will not be relevant? And therefore he shouldn't testify?
I do assume that. But I also stated that I hope he does testify so we can end his whatever minutes of fame.
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News