Started By
Message

re: Joe Kent just potentially derailed prosecutor case against Kirk assassin

Posted on 3/24/26 at 12:56 pm to
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
66450 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 12:56 pm to
It's just 100% hysterical lying GOPe shill bullshite from you now, isn't it?
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
13988 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

If he has actual relevant evidence, it should be considered. If it is not actual relevant evidence, it won’t make it into evidence at the trial.

This is not complicated.


Exactly. This should be obvious.
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
17937 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

That accusation could undermine the prosecutors’ case against Robinson.


Ummm..... how?

I'm about at my wits end with these social media bullshite artists.
This post was edited on 3/24/26 at 12:59 pm
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
131184 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

That is what the frickin court case is for. Obviously.



I doubt virtually anything that he would "testify" to would be admissible
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
13988 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

About the Charlie Kirk shooting? I think he knows as much about it as most of us do.




I think the mere fact that he says he wants to testify says otherwise.
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
13988 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 12:59 pm to
quote:


I doubt virtually anything that he would "testify" to would be admissible


Then there is no harm in him testifying is there?
Seriously, do you people even pay attention or think about what you're saying?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
129490 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 12:59 pm to
Everything he knows he’s already told Candace and she’s yapped about it.

The defense won’t even be able to use him as a witness.
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
13988 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

Everything he knows he’s already told Candace and she’s yapped about it.


You have no clue if this is true or not.
Posted by aubie101
Russia
Member since Nov 2010
4211 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:00 pm to
MAGA would have loved this if he was a Trump loyalist, Now? He is a disgrace.... It truly is a hive mentality.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
129490 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

Then there is no harm in him testifying is there?


Correct. I hope he does testify. He’ll cement his place in Tomfoolery Land.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
131184 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

Then there is no harm in him testifying is there?



How would he testify if his testimony is inadmissible

There would be great harm in someone testifying that has no relevant information whatsoever that is verifiable or first hand to the crime itself

If he is just there to peddle conspiracies, no judge is going to let him do so

quote:

Seriously, do you people even pay attention or think about what you're saying?



Irony
This post was edited on 3/24/26 at 1:02 pm
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
129490 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

You have no clue if this is true or not.


I do have a clue in that he had no problem leaking evidence that was given to him to Candace.

If he had more, he would’ve leaked more.
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
13988 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

How would he testify if his testimony is inadmissible


So the answer is no, you don't think about what you're saying.
Posted by tigerlion
Member since Jul 2009
2394 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

There is 0% chance that kid acted alone. I'll never be convinced otherwise.


Lol. Same. There’s no way. Also, I prefer transparency in this supposed democracy we live in.

We still also being told Thomas Crooks acted alone on that rooftop in Butler? Roof washed immediately and let’s keep it moving, folks.

Let’s just always keep it moving, right? Take the jab so you don’t die, tranny kid killed Charlie, let’s ship the 9/11 debris overseas “for investigation,” Barack Hussein’s swimmer chef drowned, cameras malfunctioned when Epstein killed himself, ya know…..
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
13988 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

he had more, he would’ve leaked more.


You have no clue if this is true or not either.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
131184 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:02 pm to
Explain it to me. If he is not bringing any relevant, admissible testimony, why would a Judge allow him to testify
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
13988 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

If he is not bringing any relevant, admissible testimony


You have no clue if this is true or not.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
129490 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

You have no clue if this is true or not either.


But we do have evidence that he has no compunction in leaking government evidence to crazy black woman.

So I do have a clue.
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
13988 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

So I do have a clue.


No you don't.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
129490 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

You have no clue if this is true or not.


Sure. He’s had multiple media appearances and hasn’t given a scintilla of evidence. But he’s got it, buster. Just you wait and see!
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram