Started By
Message

re: Jan 6th committee is now going after elected state officials in AZ

Posted on 7/3/22 at 9:52 am to
Posted by lsusteve1
Member since Dec 2004
41903 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 9:52 am to
Need to return the favor after November
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35394 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 10:11 am to
quote:

Then why all of the lawsuits to prevent audits and investigations?
Your side sued the local and state election boards. Not the other way around.
quote:

Why are people who questioned the results being subject to DOJ investigations and being dragged to DC?
If you have been watching, a lot of the depositions have been handled via video conferencing. No one is getting dragged to DC. And people like Barr, who laughed at 2000 Mules, have testified. Why are the people who believe the lie the only ones refusing to testify?
quote:

What you just said is an outright lie. Yet you say it so freely.
I sincerely want to see the evidence. I want to see the list of dead people. Because every time your side accidently releases an address or name, it is proven legit within the hour and we all get to laugh at your side that much more.
quote:

Lots of stuff has been found. You just ignore it. You are a dishonest person.


THEN SHOW IT!
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48303 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 10:18 am to
quote:

Your side sued the local and state election boards. Not the other way around


And why did they file those suits? And why were the suits opposed if all you want is the truth you would welcome an investigation. Isn’t that what you said about the Russia hoax for 4 years?

quote:

No one is getting dragged to DC.

So what? Liz Cheney said that the most important job she has is protecting people from Donald Trump and preventing him from being president again. Even someone as partisan as you can see that she shouldn’t be issuing subpoenas for anything or be involved with this committee at all.

I ask again. Why didn’t Pelosi let Republicans pick their own committee members, as it has always been done?

quote:

we all get to laugh at your side that much more.

oh my.
Your “side” cannot define what a woman is, attempted a coup and impeached a president twice over completely fabricated allegations. You bought into that for over 4 years. There are mounds of sworn statements and findings of voter fraud and irregularities. Yet you still state there is no evidence. It’s like playing chess against a pigeon.

quote:

THEN SHOW IT!

Then allow an unimpeded full investigation in any jurisdiction that wants it.

Even If I provide links where fraud was found from the few investigations that weren’t shite down. you will still claim there is none. You would have to be a complete moron to not have been exposed to any of the examples.
This post was edited on 7/3/22 at 10:24 am
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35394 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 10:24 am to
quote:

I don’t think many are saying the law shouldn’t consider rare cases. I realize some states will have blanket prohibitions. Most won’t. The silly position is to demand the feds take over the lawmaking because a few states don’t consider rare cases. Even sillier would be to bemoan a solid constitutional analysis because you don’t understand what the ruling says.
So you admit there are women in those states who are having their rights denied? I mean it is the job of the Federal government to step in even if it is a single person whose rights are violated.
quote:

Such as?
bathroom bills, criminalizing doctors prescribing hormone therapy and puberty blockers. The latter is usually included in bills blocking surgery which I am ok with except for kids born with organs from both sexes. They just go too far with restricting medication.
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
36761 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 10:26 am to
quote:

which discovered hundreds of thousands of illegal votes in the 2020 election.

No it didn't
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48303 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 10:27 am to
quote:

So you admit there are women in those states who are having their rights denied?


What? I said there aren’t many laws that don’t consider rare cases. How do you draw your conclusion from what I said? The constitutional analysis regarding “rights” was clear. Could you just not understand it?

quote:

mean it is the job of the Federal government to step in even if it is a single person whose rights are violated.

Oh…yeah…you didn’t understand it.

quote:

bathroom bills, criminalizing doctors prescribing hormone therapy and puberty blockers. The latter is usually included in bills blocking surgery which I am ok with except for kids born with organs from both sexes. They just go too far with restricting medication.

And these are federal laws?
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35394 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 10:28 am to
quote:

And why did they file those suits? And why were the suits opposed if all you want is the truth you would welcome an investigation. Isn’t that what you said about the Russia hoax for 4 years?
Your side filed those suits because the wanted to lie to their base that the election was rigged. Obviously successful for many of the sheep.
quote:

So what?
You claimed he was getting dragged to DC. I just pointed out that was wrong.
quote:

I ask again. Why didn’t Pelosi let Republicans pick their own committee members, as it has always been done?
Because the Senate Republicans rejected it, then the House Republicans tried to throw clowns like Gym Jordan on it who were SUBJECTS of the investigation.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260404 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 10:29 am to
quote:

Jan 6th committee


Huge waste of time and money, but that's what the FedGov does best.

Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
36761 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 10:29 am to
Like Benghazi before it
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260404 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 10:30 am to
quote:

Obviously successful for many of the sheep.


Obviously so. You believed that shitty Russian Collusion crap that was obviously fake.

You have absolutely no room to judge anyone as no one is as naive as you.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
34908 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 10:32 am to
In an honest Government, everybody on that Committee would be charged with Malfeasance, if not overt Treason and Conspiracy.

The only question re this whole scenario is WHEN the inevitable street fight for power occurs, and how much hurt is inflicted via 'collateral' damage. One thing is for sure, the Left will initiate it (with BS like this 'Committee') and the Right will finally jump in when they see that they are losing everything, to decide where ultimate power rests.
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
53771 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 11:43 am to
I would respond with

"Are you sure you want to put me on TV?"
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123896 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 11:52 am to
quote:

The next package we send Ukraine should include Cheney.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53468 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

oklahogjr


Worst economy in my life time.


Markets lost 8.5 TRILLION dollars.


Moms have hard time finding formula.


Food prices continue to rise


Layoffs are starting AS FOOD PRICES start to rise.


Energy prices in the middle of summer have gone up 40%


Supply chain issues still ramped.


Nations are banding together against the US and the DOLLAR.



GAS prices hit all time highes due to his policies.


He just shut down DRILLING....


ETC ETC

And they are focused on keeping Trump out.



Dem party is a JOKE and ANTI Americans.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram