Started By
Message

re: It looks like Siberia outside my house in Bossier

Posted on 11/13/18 at 11:07 am to
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
21411 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 11:07 am to
If we had only sent more money to Al Gore, he would have saved us from this......

if only......
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 11:09 am to
quote:

Sunspot activity correlates quite well with sunspot activity.
quote:

I would guess 100%


Spot on.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260357 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 11:09 am to
quote:

Based on your posts, a cursory understanding of economics is about all you possess


To understand economics is to understand human behavior, but I certainly didn't expect you to know that either
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118760 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 11:13 am to
quote:

No, you guys just never understand basic science and the explanations of climate.



Please make one scientific assertion. Something simple we can all agree upon. No assertions based on consensus opinion. Something beyond opinion. Can you list the law of thermodynamics? How about Newtons laws? Those seem pretty basic, but highly important.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118760 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 11:14 am to
quote:

Spot on.


ISWYDT
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118760 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 11:17 am to
quote:

To understand economics is to understand human behavior, but I certainly didn't expect you to know that either




The First Law of Thermo is still applicable to economics. The problem is, quantifying all the inputs. Human behavior inputs are highly variable and unpredictable.
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64655 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 11:18 am to
quote:

1959
5 inches
L.c.
Melted by noon.
Closed the bridge for a while there.


I was there.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260357 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 11:19 am to
quote:

The problem is, quantifying all the inputs. Human behavior inputs are highly variable and unpredictable.

correct, but generally predictable on a macro scale
Posted by Ebbandflow
Member since Aug 2010
13457 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

To understand economics is to understand human behavior


The latter is definitely not you.
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

Ebbandflow


This jackass is on here melting 24/7. I miss the days right after the election when all the scum buried their head in the pillows.
Posted by Ebbandflow
Member since Aug 2010
13457 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

This jackass is on here melting 24/7. I miss the days right after the election when all the scum buried their head in the pillows


It's really strange that we replaced discourse with words like melting. So any time that I engage in a debate with any of you morons then it means I'm melting? LOL that's just really dumb
Posted by Nguyener
Kame House
Member since Mar 2013
20603 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 8:46 pm to
quote:

So any time that I engage in a debate with any of you morons


Can you provide me a link to your trying to earnestly and with an open mind debate someone on the issues
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 8:56 pm to
quote:


We're about to enter an intense period of global cooling thanks to the lack of sunspots.

Turns out the motherfricking sun has more impact on climate than a few coal plants


You realize how weak your argument is.. right?
Posted by Ebbandflow
Member since Aug 2010
13457 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 8:57 pm to
quote:

Can you provide me a link to your trying to earnestly and with an open mind debate someone on the issues



What about this thread?
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 9:01 pm to
Themunch

I was at Lagrange.

What a great sports town.

Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16566 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 9:26 pm to
quote:

No, you guys just never understand basic science and the explanations of climate.



You barely have a grasp of grade-school Algebra, you sure as hell can't even begin to fathom the mathematics behind weather and climate modeling. Hell, you don't even understand how far away we are from having adequate computational power to even make accurate weather predictions more than a few days in advance yet you think scientists can predict climate patterns decades in the future. You are so miserably uneducated but please go on and keep trying to tell others they don't know basic science...
This post was edited on 11/13/18 at 9:27 pm
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46041 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 11:12 pm to
quote:

n We're about to enter an intense period of global cooling thanks to the lack of sunspots. Turns out the motherfricking sun has more impact on climate than a few coal plants. Who knew my science predictions would be more on point than a bunch of leftists at Harvard


Non political climatologists have always known the sun is the primary driver of global weather. It really doesn’t take much thought to understand that a gigantic fusion powered source, delivering the full electromagnetic spectrum is the king daddy of global weather.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 11/14/18 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

Non political climatologists have always known the sun is the primary driver of global weather. It really doesn’t take much thought to understand that a gigantic fusion powered source, delivering the full electromagnetic spectrum is the king daddy of global weather.


This is the wrong way of looking at this.

Take 3 copies of our earth/solar system:
1 with pre-industrial human levels of GHG emissions
1 with current level of GHG emissions
1 with double our current level of GHG emissions

Will they all have an identical climate in say... 100 years? 1000 years?
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48301 posts
Posted on 11/14/18 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

This is the wrong way of looking at this. Take 3 copies of our earth/solar system: 1 with pre-industrial human levels of GHG emissions 1 with current level of GHG emissions 1 with double our current level of GHG emissions Will they all have an identical climate in say... 100 years? 1000 years?


Will they be materially different? Possibly. What are the most likely causes of the change? How much will it cost to alter this? What are the proper levels of GHG?
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 11/14/18 at 2:22 pm to
Not sure. But step one is agreeing that humans can alter climate.

End game, IMO, should be to prevent the climate from changing rapidly until we exercise control over it
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram