
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It is fascinating how the extended counts in Miss. and AK are being tolerated here
Posted on 11/11/26 at 6:39 am to TBoy
Posted on 11/11/26 at 6:39 am to TBoy
quote:
The silliness about “elections must be decided on Election Day” is, and has always been nonsense.
I honestly think that tUSA having a far less efficient system than Indonesia is embarassing and this is not "silly". The way we handle elections and the vote count is a big indicator, at least to me, of just how inefficient our governments are, on all levels.
We need to be better, but it seems too many people are such as you. You accept mediocrity.
This post was edited on 11/11/26 at 6:54 am
Posted on 11/11/26 at 6:53 am to TBoy
It's not tolerated. It all reeks.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 6:55 am to Bass Tiger
quote:
I think most Americans have come to accept the screwed elections in the US. It's the new normal
Thank you:
Motor Voter
Bush v. Gore
Covid
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:09 am to TBoy
quote:I would bet this is going on in other states but the victories or vote differences made it clear who won. But, they are likely still trying to "cure" the mail ins. But if the vote difference is 200,000 and and the mail in number is 25,000, the outcome is obvious.
It is fascinating how the extended counts in Miss. and AK are being tolerated here
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:10 am to Diamondawg
quote:
I would bet this is going on in other states but the victories or vote differences made it clear who won.
You are correct. This happens in most elections but the vote gap is larger than the outstanding votes so the winner is determined and only the minutia is left. So nobody cares that the official tally takes a while to be certified because the winner is clear.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:12 am to SlowFlowPro
This is correct. ^^^. The final count always takes several days to a week or more.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 12:08 pm to TBoy
Yeah bro, we don't like it ... but it's Mississippi and Alaska. Are you implying that the votes are being extended to unethically/criminally find more votes for the conservative candidates? Because recent history indicates it would be the opposite. Recent history indicates all these states that take forever to count are because they are counting votes that are all democrat votes.
So, of course we don't like it... but what can we do about it? It's obvious to a lot of us, nothing significant will ever be done to fix election integrity.
So, of course we don't like it... but what can we do about it? It's obvious to a lot of us, nothing significant will ever be done to fix election integrity.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 12:11 pm to oldskule
quote:
I got $100 that says the DEM will win both races....
Which is WHY it's taking so long to count votes. Recent history tells us it's taking that long because the votes being "found" and counted will 100% be Democrat votes.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 12:12 pm to VOR
quote:
The reality you don’t want to believe is that in many cases delays are the result of procedures to ensure the integrity of elections.
Oh sure... sure... Yup. And all the votes that come in late are for Democrats. Weird.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 12:12 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
On the flip side, long counts bother you now?
Exactly.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 12:15 pm to NytroBud
quote:
But there is also some truth to it
A lot of truth to it.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 12:20 pm to kingbob
You can always volunteer to work at the polls and see how the vote is counted.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 12:56 pm to BTROleMisser
quote:
Are you implying that the votes are being extended to unethically/criminally find more votes for the conservative candidates? Because recent history indicates it would be the opposite.
No, I'm not implying anything. Unlike right wingers who ALWAYS imply (without ever having any actual proof) that delays in certifying a final count is evidence of fraud, if their preferred candidate loses.
That is really the point.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 1:28 pm to TBoy
Are you opposed to them now and don’t have the balls to say it so you shitted out this mealy mouthed thread?
Posted on 11/11/26 at 2:22 pm to the808bass
quote:
Are you opposed to them now
Am I opposed to waiting until the count is finished? No, of course not.

Popular
Back to top

0











