Started By
Message

re: Is the port of NOLA putting our water supply at risk?

Posted on 4/13/26 at 8:18 am to
Posted by KamaCausey_LSU
Member since Apr 2013
17699 posts
Posted on 4/13/26 at 8:18 am to
quote:

Actually the Mid Barataria would have worsened the saltwater intrusion problem because now you would have had as much as 75,000cfs leaving the river.

I think the Mid Barataria Diversion was designed to flow when the river is high and have reduced/no flow when the river was low which is when salt water intrusion would be an issue.
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
33703 posts
Posted on 4/13/26 at 8:40 am to
The salt water wedge is the new boogie man... My dad talked about the wedge back in the 70's, you never heard a peep about it on the news...
Posted by VOR
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
68832 posts
Posted on 4/13/26 at 8:52 am to
You roll your eyes even at the mere mention of a rising sea level? You think
That it’s fake? It’s objectively measurable…
Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
12725 posts
Posted on 4/13/26 at 9:10 am to
quote:

I think the Mid Barataria Diversion was designed to flow when the river is high and have reduced/no flow when the river was low which is when salt water intrusion would be an issue.


Then what would have been the point of spending billions of dollars for a project that would only work sometimes during the year.

In drought years, that diversion may sit idle waiting for a few days or weeks that it can open without impacting freshwater concerns in the river.

The only ones that would have made money on this project would have been the contractor who built it and the agencies and organizations tasked with monitoring the the environmental impact of the project.
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
51893 posts
Posted on 4/13/26 at 9:14 am to
quote:

You roll your eyes even at the mere mention of a rising sea level? You think
That it’s fake? It’s objectively measurable…
It is.

January 29, 2026: NASA released an analysis showing that global mean sea level rose by only 0.03 inches (0.08 cm) in 2025.

Doing the math, in 100 years, that's a rise of 3".



Posted by Mr.Perfect
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2013
17612 posts
Posted on 4/13/26 at 9:20 am to
quote:

Actually the Mid Barataria would have worsened the saltwater intrusion problem because now you would have had as much as 75,000cfs leaving the river.


And creating massive amounts of land that pushes the gulf volume back. The pressure is what’s moving the salt water up the river.
Posted by KamaCausey_LSU
Member since Apr 2013
17699 posts
Posted on 4/13/26 at 10:25 am to
quote:

Then what would have been the point of spending billions of dollars for a project that would only work sometimes during the year.

In drought years, that diversion may sit idle waiting for a few days or weeks that it can open without impacting freshwater concerns in the river.

Looked up the low flow scenario and it was recommended that the diversion be closed when the River is below 300,000 cfs which is typically between September and February (usually shorter). As the basin would flow into the River when under the 300,000 cfs stage.

So the diversion would operate 7+ months out of the year. Not "wait for a few days or weeks that it can open".

The diversion would have had little to no impact on the saltwater intrusion issue for the Mississippi River.
This post was edited on 4/13/26 at 10:28 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram