- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: IS "SATELLITE RECEPTION" *really* the basis for Internet, TV, and "Global Communications"?
Posted on 2/14/22 at 10:47 am to Liberator
Posted on 2/14/22 at 10:47 am to Liberator
You're a fricking lunatic.
What would be the purpose of pretending the earth is round?
What would be the purpose of pretending the earth is round?
This post was edited on 2/14/22 at 10:48 am
Posted on 2/14/22 at 10:47 am to Liberator
quote:
Liberator
Why didn't you address the experiment Fun Bunch suggested?
Posted on 2/14/22 at 10:52 am to cajunangelle
quote:
There are a lot of other things to talk about. Pick another subject.
This can of Truth Bomb / worms hasn't even begun to be torn open...
By the time I am done here -- believe it or not -- even YOU will see the light and become one of my greatest allies. (IF "Truth" is your bottom line).
No one likes being lied to. No one like being Gaslighted 24/7. No one likes being betrayed. That is the agenda the entire g0vt has proven. (which also includes THE one g0vt agenda most people love, trust and respect; and THAT is why the Truth on this one -- NASA -- may hurt the most.)
Posted on 2/14/22 at 10:53 am to Displaced
If you're going to be respectful in your questions, I'll respond.
If you're going to be a pr*ck, then you can frick yourself sideways.
If you're going to be a pr*ck, then you can frick yourself sideways.
Posted on 2/14/22 at 11:12 am to Liberator
By all means, take any tactic to not answer simple questions you don't have a good answer to.
Posted on 2/14/22 at 4:01 pm to Fun Bunch
Tell you what. Do your own experiment.
Somehow you believe this array of questions are "GOTCHA"s??
You don't quite understand the limits of the human sight; How about an understanding of atmospheric distortion through haze and air? (Once THOSE usual obstructions and masking were greatly reduced by infrared and polarizing lens filtering via ZOOM, the extent of sight for hundreds of miles was possible and amazing).
Also dismissed or un-considered:
The concept of the points of convergence and what eventually become a single vanishing point of perspective (down long hotel hallways or railroad track).
Are the objects disappearing? OR, has human eyesight limits?
Hey Funny-Bunchy dude...
What will you say when I provide an actual g0vt document that admits the earth is "FLAT" and "NON-ROTATING"?
quote:
Buy a really nice telescope. Say, somewhere between 1000-3000 dollars. Go to NYC and go to the top of a skyscraper like the freedom tower.
Get the coordinates for Western Sahara. No mountains in the way or anything like that.
Can you see Western Sahara with your telescope? Let us know.
Somehow you believe this array of questions are "GOTCHA"s??
You don't quite understand the limits of the human sight; How about an understanding of atmospheric distortion through haze and air? (Once THOSE usual obstructions and masking were greatly reduced by infrared and polarizing lens filtering via ZOOM, the extent of sight for hundreds of miles was possible and amazing).
Also dismissed or un-considered:
The concept of the points of convergence and what eventually become a single vanishing point of perspective (down long hotel hallways or railroad track).
Are the objects disappearing? OR, has human eyesight limits?
Hey Funny-Bunchy dude...
What will you say when I provide an actual g0vt document that admits the earth is "FLAT" and "NON-ROTATING"?
Posted on 2/14/22 at 4:03 pm to Liberator
Hey look everyone, we landed on the moon
Eta: after reading beyond the OP, I can only assume the moon la ding was actually discussed somewhere in this thread, so i might be late to the party.
Eta: after reading beyond the OP, I can only assume the moon la ding was actually discussed somewhere in this thread, so i might be late to the party.
This post was edited on 2/14/22 at 4:06 pm
Posted on 2/14/22 at 4:05 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
since I'm here... Liberator, a lot of posters are requesting your return on the young earth thread.
Drew the short-straw on being an Errand Boy, eh?
Help me understand what the Lilliputians don't quite understand. (Pabst and Schlitz re-fills? More chips? )
Posted on 2/14/22 at 4:06 pm to Liberator
quote:
What will you say when I provide an actual g0vt document that admits the earth is "FLAT" and "NON-ROTATING"?
Does that gov doc also replace the letter O with a zero?
This post was edited on 2/14/22 at 4:07 pm
Posted on 2/14/22 at 4:13 pm to LSUnation78
A "Space Force Fan!"
Did you get the bad news on souvenirs? The "Moon Rock" the Danish received from NASA was merely "petrified wood".
Oh...also in case you hadn't received this memo either; somehow, some way, NASA "lost" ALL of its supposed landings/tech "telemetry" for getting TO the Moon. And now they admit the furthest" they can go is "Low Earth Orbit."
So in 50 years, NASA is claiming they have gone BACKWARDS. Doesn't sound very credible to quite a few folks.
Did you get the bad news on souvenirs? The "Moon Rock" the Danish received from NASA was merely "petrified wood".
Oh...also in case you hadn't received this memo either; somehow, some way, NASA "lost" ALL of its supposed landings/tech "telemetry" for getting TO the Moon. And now they admit the furthest" they can go is "Low Earth Orbit."
So in 50 years, NASA is claiming they have gone BACKWARDS. Doesn't sound very credible to quite a few folks.
This post was edited on 2/14/22 at 4:20 pm
Posted on 2/14/22 at 4:14 pm to LSUnation78
Editing your post already?

Posted on 2/14/22 at 4:15 pm to LSUnation78
(no message)
This post was edited on 2/18/22 at 12:44 pm
Posted on 2/14/22 at 4:21 pm to Liberator
Flat earth and revelation end of times. How did we get less plausible than the insane q stuff?
Posted on 2/14/22 at 4:29 pm to Liberator
I'm not sure if op is a better example of "a little knowledge is a dangerous thing" or just the Dunning-Kruger effect.
Posted on 2/14/22 at 4:31 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
How did we get less plausible than the insane q stuff?
Tell me EXACTLY what you think is "implausible" and I try and help clarify things for you. (I don't get this insane obsession with "q").
Are you interested in what you are TOLD is "Truth"? OR in actual Truth?
I assume most posters here are capable of focusing on debates and discussions of interesting separate issues -- and NOT necessarily conflating different pet issues and making B-Lines straight to their same old axes to grind, grudges, and comfortable scripts?
This post was edited on 2/14/22 at 4:32 pm
Posted on 2/14/22 at 4:36 pm to jonnyanony
quote:
The Dunning-Kruger effect.
Just a wee bit of projection here? Admit it.
I've got better things to do, frankly.
Some people here appreciate newly discovered knowledge and truth after being lied to their entire lives, 24/7. This is for *them*.
If what you already "know" is good enough, that great news; but share what you've got -- I welcome it.
Posted on 2/14/22 at 4:39 pm to Liberator
Data transfer by and large exists via high speed capacity physical lines.
Most people know this.
Satellite is not a high speed option nor is it designed to be. It's used in situations where days can be latent and lossy.
The higher the frequency the more lossy and shorter range the transmission will be.
This is all basic stuff, you weren't blown the lid off of anything.
Most people know this.
Satellite is not a high speed option nor is it designed to be. It's used in situations where days can be latent and lossy.
The higher the frequency the more lossy and shorter range the transmission will be.
This is all basic stuff, you weren't blown the lid off of anything.
Posted on 2/14/22 at 4:40 pm to Liberator
I mentioned the moon landing tongue in cheek because i thought the OP was already well known. It wasnt until I read more of the thread that I realized mentioning the moon landing was actually on-topic for the thread.
Thats a legit reason for editing, and i only added did not remove anything from my post.
Thats a legit reason for editing, and i only added did not remove anything from my post.
Posted on 2/14/22 at 4:40 pm to narddogg81
quote:
yeah this dumbass is a flat earther or a fed.
And IF you're correct in one or the other case (OR BOTH?), then what?
Posted on 2/14/22 at 4:40 pm to LSUnation78
I stand corrected. My bad.
Popular
Back to top



2




