Started By
Message

re: Is abortion murder?

Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:21 pm to
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
21831 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:21 pm to
quote:

Because you can't get very far on your own.


That’s just a question of pragmatism, not morality, and many people think it’s more pragmatic to look out for #1. Criminals violate the social order all the time because they logically care about their personal well-being, not anybody else’s. Many of them are quite successful and stupid rich, as are many con men like Joel Osteen. Nothing wrong with that, right? They’re rich, they’re happy, and in 100 years it won’t matter even a little bit how they made their money.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46513 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:21 pm to
quote:

And where is that laid out, exactly?


The evolutionary process has selected for certain sexual and social behaviors that make higher order social mammals more likely to succeed and pass on their genetic information. And at the very top of that list is “don’t kill your own offspring for funzies”.
Posted by MaroonNation
StarkVegas, Mississippi, Bitch!
Member since Nov 2010
21950 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:22 pm to
You do realize rape and incest only account for 1.5% of abortions. Probably a lot less but we all know the girls that get knocked up then scream rape when shite doesn’t go as planned. 80% of abortions are solely for a form of birth control. Again. Number is probably a lot closer to 90-95% because hoes lie
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
21831 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:24 pm to
quote:

The evolutionary process has selected for certain sexual and social behaviors that make higher order social mammals more likely to succeed and pass on their genetic information. And at the very top of that list is “don’t kill your own offspring for funzies”.


But killing offspring that aren’t my own would be pretty advantageous.

In any event you’re talking about urges. We recognize those and can override them. Logically why would I care about having offspring? I should only care about the 80 or 90 years I might have here and maximizing my personal enjoyment.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46513 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:25 pm to
quote:

That’s just a question of pragmatism, not morality, and many people think it’s more pragmatic to look out for #1. Criminals violate the social order all the time because they logically care about their personal well-being, not anybody else’s. Many of them are quite successful and stupid rich, as are many con men like Joel Osteen. Nothing wrong with that, right? They’re rich, they’re happy, and in 100 years it won’t matter even a little bit how they made their money.


There’s a reason the vast majority of humans don’t commit violent crimes. We know that violent criminals are far more likely to exhibit certain genetic and psychosocial deviations from the norm that predispose to that behavior and those behaviors are selected against in a social society. Simply put, violent criminals are less successful at passing on their genetic information. If they weren’t the case society couldn’t exist as it does, and it does exist in part because of selective pressure.

The rest of your post is just a highly intelligent species developing the ability to hack the system. That doesn’t change the reality of the system though.
This post was edited on 5/4/22 at 9:26 pm
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
21705 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:27 pm to
quote:

And where is that laid out, exactly?


Virtually every human being are interacting with other human beings and their environment.

quote:

That’s just a name you give to your moral code, which you’ve already admitted is nothing but personal preference.



No, it's not that greedy. It's more like "humanities preference".
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46513 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:28 pm to
quote:

But killing offspring that aren’t my own would be pretty advantageous.


Only in a society where that behavior doesn’t hurt your ability to reproduce. That’s not the case in literally every human society that has ever existed. Killing an out groups offspring sure, but killing the offspring of those in your “group” (which now really encompasses all humans) sure won’t.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
21831 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:29 pm to
quote:

That doesn’t change the reality of the system though.


But the system as you describe it is amoral; it's silly to pretend that there are objectively wrong behaviors, so why talk about murder? Why be upset about a hypothetical God that kills babies? There's no moral value assigned to passing on your genetic material, or infanticide or any other activity.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46513 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:30 pm to
quote:

Logically why would I care about having offspring? I should only care about the 80 or 90 years I might have here and maximizing my personal enjoyment.


But most of your life isn’t dictated by logic, it’s dictated by biology. Choice is largely an illusion created by our narrow scope of existence.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
21831 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:32 pm to
quote:

But most of your life isn’t dictated by logic, it’s dictated by biology. Choice is largely an illusion created by our narrow scope of existence.



You're incapable of logic? I use it all the time; I suspect you do as well.

Maybe the oligarchs and the Osteens of the world are just better at logic than the average person and don't let it dictate their lives?

Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
21705 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:33 pm to
quote:

But killing offspring that aren’t my own would be pretty advantageous.


Not if one of those offsprings lives to create a cure to a disease you're going to have. Or produces a crop you can trade for that prevents you from starving. Or, invents the wheel which makes your life easier. Or fights off a predator you couldn't outrun because of a simple ankle sprain you obtained because you weren't intelligent enough to recognize the advantages of living in a community that sought after the happiness and prosperity for its members.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
21831 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:34 pm to
quote:

Virtually every human being are interacting with other human beings and their environment.


That's not an answer. Where is "Natural Law" defined?
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
21831 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:35 pm to
quote:

Not if one of those offsprings lives to create a cure to a disease you're going to have. Or produces a crop you can trade for that prevents you from starving.


So? You're still discussing pragmatism, not morality. Hell, there are people who think the world needs fewer humans. You can't really criticize their beliefs other than to say you don't agree with them.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46513 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

But the system as you describe it is amoral; it's silly to pretend that there are objectively wrong behaviors, so why talk about murder? Why be upset about a hypothetical God that kills babies? There's no moral value assigned to passing on your genetic material, or infanticide or any other activity.


Of course there is no “objective” morality, because there can’t be such a thing. Such an idea is wholly inconsistent with literally everything we know about history and reality.

However, if we accept the system in which we live which DOES have objective parameters (and it does because many things are tangible and objective in our reality) then we absolutely can say that there are behaviors that are objectively more or less likely to lead to personal and group success within that system. And I firmly believe that abortion for convenience is objectively a net negative impact of overall human success and increases net suffering. The sheer volume of depression and poor life outcomes for those who get abortions is strong evidence in and of itself. A woman who has an abortion is something like 7x more likely to suffer from clinical depression than a woman who doesn’t, and depression objectively limits life success below what is maximal. And that’s just one aspect.

Now sure, if you’re a nihilist in the truest sense then nothing matters and we should just burn it down. I’m not going to pretend I have anything to offer such a person.
This post was edited on 5/4/22 at 9:37 pm
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
21705 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:37 pm to
quote:

That’s just a question of pragmatism, not morality,


Let me guess, you're also going to argue that a society that follows Christian tenets will be extremely prosperous and happy?

I guess it's just a coincidence that pragmatism and morality are virtually a circle when displayed as a Venn diagram?
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
21831 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:38 pm to
quote:

Only in a society where that behavior doesn’t hurt your ability to reproduce.


Again, why would I care? I'm sentient and can understand that evolutionary pressures may not be in my own personal interests. People purposefully don't have children so that they can enjoy life more; it's becoming more and more common. And it's typically higher among people with higher educations and in higher economic categories.
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
21705 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:39 pm to
quote:

Where is "Natural Law" defined?


Where all other words are defined?
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46513 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:40 pm to
quote:

You're incapable of logic?


We’re all capable of it, we just don’t operate purely by it very often. What we term “logically” just coincidentally happens to often coincide with behaviors that are clearly driven by our biology.

The number of times you violate your biology in favor of logic that deviates from it is relatively rare, all instances considered. You just don’t realize it.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46513 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:41 pm to
quote:

Again, why would I care?


Because you have a biological drive to live and that behavior will end your life very quickly
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
21831 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:43 pm to
quote:

Now sure, if you’re a nihilist in the truest sense then nothing matters and we should just burn it down. I’m not going to pretend I have anything to offer such a person.



I'm a Christian, not a nihilist. I'm pointing out that nihilism is the logic endpoint of a materialistic, atheistic worldview. People like Azkiger like to pretend that the hypothetical God that Christians believe in is "bad", and I'm just demonstrating that he has no scaffolding on which to stand to make that claim.

You've (accurately IMO) explained why a lot of humans behave as they do, but again, that's pragmatism, not morality. And pragmatism only works if the goal is agreed upon to begin with.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram