Started By
Message

re: Indiana Doctor 'reprimanded' after performing an abortion on 10 year old

Posted on 5/26/23 at 4:40 pm to
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128778 posts
Posted on 5/26/23 at 4:40 pm to
LINK

And here’s you claiming the doctor was just doing some political advocacy. Hilarious.
Posted by NCIS_76
Member since Jan 2021
5246 posts
Posted on 5/26/23 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

She should lose her medical license


That's not enough.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 5/26/23 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

And here’s you claiming the doctor was just doing some political advocacy. Hilarious.
You are a disingenuous arse, trying to create the impression that I said the child's ABORTION was "political advocacy."

What I ARGUED was that a physician such as her is ENTITLED to engage in political advocacy. Merely being a physician does not preclude her from doing so.
Posted by faraway
Member since Nov 2022
3810 posts
Posted on 5/26/23 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

Either her mom’s boyfriend or her brother. Even odds. Incest is an endemic issue for Guatemalans.


not limited to Guatemalans
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44275 posts
Posted on 5/26/23 at 5:53 pm to
quote:

What I ARGUED was that a physician such as her is ENTITLED to engage in political advocacy. Merely being a physician does not preclude her from doing so.


Via medical procedures?

Now do Josef Mengele.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 5/26/23 at 6:13 pm to
quote:

What I ARGUED was that a physician such as her is ENTITLED to engage in political advocacy. Merely being a physician does not preclude her from doing so.
quote:

Via medical procedures?

Again, not remotely what I said in that other thread.

of course, you are both too stupid and too lazy to go read what was actually said.
Posted by jnethe1
Pearland
Member since Dec 2012
17826 posts
Posted on 5/27/23 at 9:24 am to
quote:

This is the entire liberal movement…no consequences for their actions as long as it’s for the “cause”. Liberal judges will ensure this…thank you Soros!


But if you dare to defend yourself, you will be punished.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
46854 posts
Posted on 5/27/23 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

If this is what you think your god wants, I’m super glad he’s make believe. Yikes.
What God wants is the faithful obedience and worship He deserves and is owed as the creator of the universe and righteous judge.

If you reject Him, then you have no rational basis for saying anything is objectively “wrong”, even “forcing” a pregnant mother to not have her child killed.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
46854 posts
Posted on 5/27/23 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

Imagine that your 10 year old daughter had been raped, would any of you really make your 10 year old daughter remain pregnant and deliver a baby? I seriously doubt any of you would that.
If abortion is morally wrong (it is), then it remains morally wrong regardless of whether or not the mother was raped or was/is 10 year old.

What you are doing is making an emotional appeal and not an argument. Do you honestly think morality should be based on our emotions?
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
46854 posts
Posted on 5/27/23 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

Several yahoos will claim that they would do otherwise. One or two might even mean it. We have some seriously-misguided Bible-thumpers here.
Considering you have an arbitrary moral compass, I’m not sure you have much room to talk about people being morally (or otherwise) misguided.
Posted by TGFN57
Telluride
Member since Jan 2010
6975 posts
Posted on 5/27/23 at 8:53 pm to
There is no argument, none, that would justify forcing a ten year old child to carry a baby after being raped. What kind of sick monster would even consider that.
Posted by jcaz
Laffy
Member since Aug 2014
19296 posts
Posted on 5/27/23 at 8:55 pm to
I’m anti-abortion but don’t think it’s safe for a 10 year old to carry a baby to term.
But why did she have to run her mouth about it? Was she pro-life and whining?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138897 posts
Posted on 5/27/23 at 9:01 pm to
quote:

If you mean, should they be forced to not have their own child murdered, then the answer is “yes”.
You really should refrain from entering medical discussions about which, you haven't even the foggiest idea. In the instance of a 10y/o pregnancy, there is a far, far greater chance mother and/or child die, than both live.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138897 posts
Posted on 5/27/23 at 9:03 pm to
quote:

I’m not sure you have much room to talk about people being morally (or otherwise) misguided.
When you're willing to kill two instead of one, morality isn't the field on which you're battling.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
46854 posts
Posted on 5/28/23 at 12:59 am to
quote:

There is no argument, none, that would justify forcing a ten year old child to carry a baby after being raped. What kind of sick monster would even consider that.
Where is your argument? You are using emotive language, as if emotion alone is the moral compass on this issue.

If abortion is immoral because it takes a defenseless life, then it remains immoral regardless of the age of the mother.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
46854 posts
Posted on 5/28/23 at 1:00 am to
quote:

When you're willing to kill two instead of one, morality isn't the field on which you're battling
Who said anything about killing two people?
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
46854 posts
Posted on 5/28/23 at 1:02 am to
quote:

You really should refrain from entering medical discussions about which, you haven't even the foggiest idea. In the instance of a 10y/o pregnancy, there is a far, far greater chance mother and/or child die, than both live.
I’m perfectly aware of the issues at hand. If a child must be delivered early for the sake of the mother’s life and the child dies as a result, that is not an abortion.
Posted by HamTheOtherPinkMeat
Member since Dec 2022
229 posts
Posted on 5/28/23 at 1:30 am to
quote:

not limited to Guatemalans


Louisiana has the largest deaf/blind population in the U.S. Guess why.
Posted by TGFN57
Telluride
Member since Jan 2010
6975 posts
Posted on 5/28/23 at 9:23 am to
You are literally what I described in my post.
The judgement of God will be especially terrible for monsters like you. There is a special place in hell for all of you.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128778 posts
Posted on 5/28/23 at 9:30 am to
No. It won’t. You’re wrong.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram