Started By
Message

re: In 2018 wtf can't people vote online ?

Posted on 8/8/18 at 12:11 am to
Posted by m2pro
Member since Nov 2008
29723 posts
Posted on 8/8/18 at 12:11 am to
quote:

We'll all need a good laugh here.




but for real.... we really do.
Posted by Gptxr
Member since Jul 2018
60 posts
Posted on 8/8/18 at 12:16 am to
lol, no one has still found one instance in the history of Earth where manual actions of people are more accurate or more easily verified then data. This is really 3rd grade stuff folks.
Posted by indianswim
Plano, TX
Member since Jan 2010
21508 posts
Posted on 8/8/18 at 12:21 am to
Nice. Pretty sure you are trolling at this point. Have fun showing your friends how you dragged this topic out to 4+ pages tomorrow. Well done.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
57250 posts
Posted on 8/8/18 at 12:21 am to
quote:

no one has still found one instance in the history of Earth where manual actions of people are more accurate or more easily verified then data. This is really 3rd grade stuff folks.


Audit you say? I’m starting to doubt even the shitty credentials you posted.
Posted by Phil A Sheo
equinsu ocha
Member since Aug 2011
12166 posts
Posted on 8/8/18 at 12:23 am to
quote:

Pretty sure you are trolling


Let's hope so, b/c if not this guys frickin retarded..
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55391 posts
Posted on 8/8/18 at 12:23 am to
quote:

Completely disagree.


Then PROVE to us all a system that is not hackable. Please.


quote:

Other states and countries all ever already have it and no disasters.


Either you are ignorant on the top or you are willfully lying.

quote:

Australia has experimented with pilots of Internet voting technologies, most recently in New South Wales in 2011. An assessment of the NSW program noted that there was a significant problem with mis-recorded votes, where votes were recorded as an alphabetic letter rather than as the required digits.


They tried it again and found it was..... HACKABLE! Vulnerability to the FREAK attack. Vulnerability to the Logjam attack. Proof-of-concept, exploitability, and responsible disclosure.

I could go on with this one... BUT.. Let's move to other EXPERIMENTS...



CANADA:

Here is their determination sir:


quote:

3. Internet Voting Fundamentally, the Internet was designed to share information, not to secure it. Though an increasing amount of daily commercial life—from shopping to banking—has moved online, Internet voting poses security challenges that are unique and, in their current state, insurmountable.

The overwhelming consensus among computer security experts is that Internet voting is fundamentally insecure and cannot be safely implemented because of security vulnerabilities inherent in the architecture and organization of both the Internet and commonly used software/hardware:

? Internet voting is extremely vulnerable to a wide range of cyber-attacks, and many of these are impossible to detect.

? Internet voting poses extraordinary and unnecessary risks to election integrity, and even a small issue—were it even detectable—could completely undermine public trust.

? Every jurisdiction whose Internet voting system has been thoroughly examined by security experts—including the long-running system in Estonia—has revealed major vulnerabilities that could allow the system to be hacked, to reverse election outcomes, or to selectively disenfranchise voters, all while going completely undetected.

? Many jurisdictions that ran Internet voting pilots—including Washington, DC, France, and Norway—cancelled the projects due to security issues.






That was 2016.

Shall I continue?
Posted by Gptxr
Member since Jul 2018
60 posts
Posted on 8/8/18 at 12:26 am to
Sorry about your disconnect with reality. Hope you get better.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55391 posts
Posted on 8/8/18 at 12:26 am to
quote:

Funny. Nothing but rehtorical bull shite and no facts. Why trumptopia board are such snowflakes. Such irony.


And there it is.


Posted by m2pro
Member since Nov 2008
29723 posts
Posted on 8/8/18 at 12:27 am to
quote:

Shall I continue?


let me stop you there. the guy is trolling or stupid or really young.

i went down the route of asking him to provide links etc. nothing.

he's also probably very new to this forum or forums in general. useless to talk to. i think the rest of us are bouncing. ciao!
This post was edited on 8/8/18 at 12:28 am
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55391 posts
Posted on 8/8/18 at 12:30 am to
quote:

How about every f****** publicly company on Earth does nothing f****** Manuel anymore you f****** mouth breathing moron dumb f***


How did a person who can't spell and has horrible grammar hire you?

Manuel?? Is he working with you.


You have offered no evidence that supports it being safe.

BTW... the CIA computers have been hacked kid.

Posted by Gptxr
Member since Jul 2018
60 posts
Posted on 8/8/18 at 12:32 am to
Yes since all mentioned will have it within five years.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55391 posts
Posted on 8/8/18 at 12:33 am to
quote:

And you have yet to explain why horrible other than more hacking which is a stupid f****** joke considering most every f****** organization and major company in the world utilizes data to validate their results Viet Financial budget forecasting HR, you name it.



Try again in English.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55391 posts
Posted on 8/8/18 at 12:37 am to
quote:

Maybe sit out a few more rounds before you start to post. I don't think you get how it works here yet.


Here? Man, it is an accepted method. Everywhere. His argument is "Aliens from the Planet Krog has stolen Elvis" and demanding you accept it as truth without proof. Not even a tabloid.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55391 posts
Posted on 8/8/18 at 12:42 am to
quote:

Yes since all mentioned will have it within five years.


Have what? A pony? STDS?
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 8/8/18 at 12:48 am to
Bingo.

Voting will be tracked on a blockchain within the decade.
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus
Member since Jan 2018
10441 posts
Posted on 8/8/18 at 5:09 am to
quote:

lol, no one has still found one instance in the history of Earth where manual actions of people are more accurate or more easily verified then data. This is really 3rd grade stuff folks.


I know every bit of personal and identifiable information for my ex and my brother. I could easily vote for them online. With only a modicum of effort, I could get it for my parents and probably a few other family members and friends. I could not show up in person with a legitimate government ID and vote for any of them.
Posted by TaderSalad
mudbug territory
Member since Jul 2014
25995 posts
Posted on 8/8/18 at 5:15 am to
quote:

In 2018 wtf can't people vote online ?


quote:

I work for a Fortune 100 company in Audit



You audit people have a weird way of thinking...
Posted by Tiger in NY
Neptune Beach, FL
Member since Sep 2003
31434 posts
Posted on 8/8/18 at 7:37 am to
quote:

Name one instance where Democrats and Republicans weren't going after each other for some b******* about redistricting let's see intimidation at the polls gerrymandering, illegals and a million other things. If you treated it like a company and hire the right people you're just doing a reconciliacion is not that freaking hard. You can set up variance threshold to.001% accuracy. There is absolutely no argument to be made that manual is more accurate. Period.




Where would people vote from? How would you verify it was actually them? You just want to sound smart but you are naive.
Posted by bamafan1001
Member since Jun 2011
15783 posts
Posted on 8/8/18 at 8:01 am to
Making it easier to vote so lazy dumbasses can cast a vote from their armchair...frick that
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram