Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Idiot tells the crowd to wipe out Ice agents. How soon does he get arrested?

Posted on 10/22/25 at 4:43 pm
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
18057 posts
Posted on 10/22/25 at 4:43 pm



The guy below must not have a sufficient retirement plan.

This old fella must do time with his threats against a POTUS!!
This post was edited on 10/22/25 at 4:52 pm
Posted by RohanGonzales
Member since Apr 2024
8389 posts
Posted on 10/22/25 at 4:44 pm to
Guilty whyte min are the worst.
Posted by UncleFestersLegs
Member since Nov 2010
16559 posts
Posted on 10/22/25 at 4:44 pm to
Is this where Decaturd posts about some republican group chat?
Posted by 21blackjack
Member since Oct 2025
1099 posts
Posted on 10/22/25 at 4:48 pm to
Can actions be taken against this lunatic?
This post was edited on 10/22/25 at 5:38 pm
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
39226 posts
Posted on 10/22/25 at 4:49 pm to
But moderates on here have assured me that there's no way we end up in a violent shooting civil war.
Posted by MintBerry Crunch
Member since Nov 2010
5849 posts
Posted on 10/22/25 at 4:49 pm to
Some of you need a lesson in the First Amendment.

You can say this type of stuff if there is no threat of IMMINENT lawless action. If he said that with an ICE agent present in a crowd, then there would be an actionable claim.

Advocacy of force or criminal activity does not receive First Amendment protections if (1) the advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action, and (2) is likely to incite or produce such action.[4]
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
42338 posts
Posted on 10/22/25 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

Advocacy of force or criminal activity does not receive First Amendment protections if (1) the advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action, and (2) is likely to incite or produce such action.[4]


So Epps?
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
35628 posts
Posted on 10/22/25 at 6:29 pm to
quote:

But moderates on here have assured me that there's no way we end up in a violent shooting civil war.

It's an inevitability. The 70 year psyop has been so effective that the two perceived "sides" of the citizen political spectrum are poisoned towards one another beyond possibility of cure.

Politicians want us at war so they can call martial law and seize more power that they will never relinquish. Martial law gives them authority to declare a national emergency, which will allow them to "legally" confiscate things like your food stores (for "redistribution" to less fortunate people) and your GUNS (as a "public safety measure"). This will create a serious rift and likely a physical war between Red States who refuse to illegally confiscate their citizens' property, and a Federal Government that fully intends to unilaterally seize ALL power and authority.

When they get the firearms, we're fricking finished. And it's coming. Right now, only the Grace of GOD that one side is asking for, is preventing the fecal matter from impacting the air moving device.

Look around, folks. Look how close we are to completely destroying ourselves. I suggest everyone seriously study some volumes if historical text as well as the Holy Bible.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram