- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 1/19/23 at 1:06 pm to oogabooga68
quote:
The question isn't a test of your KNOWLEDGE it's a test of your INTEGRITY and you failed.
exactly!
Posted on 1/19/23 at 1:06 pm to dr
quote:
can the man dressed as a woman breastfeed?
As I said, the question was a test of integrity, not knowledge.
He failed.
If I can't trust a person to be truthful, I can't trust them to be truly knowledgeable.
Posted on 1/19/23 at 1:06 pm to oogabooga68
I agree with you about the scientific community needing to find honest fault with mistake making and any other breaches that occur and that that's the sort of thing that would make science more credible to the public.
Posted on 1/19/23 at 1:08 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
I agree with you about the scientific community needing to find honest fault with mistake making
Cool!
Here's YOUR chance:
I posted a picture of a man named Richard Levine.
He was born a man, he will always be a man.
Will you admit you LIED and tried to explain it away in some overly verbose bullshite?
Will you admit HE IS A MAN, or will you double down on your dishonesty?
Posted on 1/19/23 at 1:09 pm to dr
quote:
deflection of the subject can the man dressed as a woman breastfeed? Feel free to consult some experts
You are not a man of medical science. How dare you?
Posted on 1/19/23 at 1:12 pm to bamadontcare
quote:
You are not a man of medical science. How dare you?
I gave this "$cientist" a question that has only ONE answer, period,end of story.
Instead of answering honestly, he crawfished and showed himself to be a liar.
If you can't answer the simplest of questions correctly and honestly, why should anyone trust you with the larger issues?
Posted on 1/19/23 at 1:17 pm to oogabooga68
quote:
Will you admit HE IS A MAN, or will you double down on your dishonesty?
This is a silly game, Booga. In your view, that'll be "doubling down", but I'll stick with my original answer. looks like a dude, though.
This post was edited on 1/19/23 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 1/19/23 at 1:20 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
This is a silly game, Booga.
No, it was a simple test of the integrity of someone who has been obsessing over the loss of trust he and his brethren have suffered over their innumerable lies.
You failed.
There was only one answer and you ran from it.
Posted on 1/19/23 at 1:23 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
None of the experimental gene therapies being pushed as "vaccines" are true vaccines, as they do not prevent transmission or infection.
frick you are dumb
quote:
Not a single virology research organization has been able to isolate SARS-CoV2.
Lies
Posted on 1/19/23 at 1:23 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
This is a silly game, Booga.
Not a game.
Part of a larger, more nefarious mindset and paranoia that have gripped the Scientific Community and "expert class" at large.
I posted a picture of a man.
Any idiot on the street could tell you, it's a man, men don't get pregnant, men don't menstruate.
The majority of fools you've spent several pages defending would also fail this simple test as you did.
It's why only sheep trust you at this point.
Posted on 1/19/23 at 1:28 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
That might be true. I think it's easier to make that case now with the higher R0, airborne transmission, decreased lethality, and less uncertainty. There's always going to be a lot of disagreement over priorities with respect to balancing the different harms of a pandemic and it's important to put everything in context of what we knew then vs. now. It wouldn't unfold the same way if we knew then what we know now.
It’s crazy how you ignore the fact that there never was a pandemic and how they lied about covid deaths to cook the numbers and create fear and hysteria.
You can’t just dismiss the fact that it was all a fckg lie.
This post was edited on 1/19/23 at 1:29 pm
Posted on 1/19/23 at 1:33 pm to LSUAngelHere1
Lots of people have been arguing in good faith here and disagreeing about what it means to have trustworthy science.
There is not a remotely accurate or responsible way to say that there was no pandemic.
Do you expect this to win people over to hating the vaccine?
There is not a remotely accurate or responsible way to say that there was no pandemic.
Do you expect this to win people over to hating the vaccine?
This post was edited on 1/19/23 at 1:36 pm
Posted on 1/19/23 at 1:36 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
Do you expect this to win people over to hating the vaccine?
Those of us who were skeptical aren't concerned with "winning people over", we're concerned with stopping the "I"m an expert do what I say or you will be destroyed" crowd which you are either knowingly or unknowingly white knighting for.
Posted on 1/19/23 at 1:41 pm to oogabooga68
quote:
Those of us who were skeptical aren't concerned with "winning people over", we're concerned with stopping the "I"m an expert do what I say or you will be destroyed" crowd which you are either knowingly or unknowingly white knighting for.
That's seems to be a fairly common practice of resistance to perceived medical tyranny - pill yourself into believing/pretending to believe there's no pandemic or there is one but it's trivial or it's a deadly bioweapon. Choose a conception as needed to resist oppression.
Posted on 1/19/23 at 1:42 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
As far as science of gender, I'm going to plead to not knowing enough about the evidence on the subject to have a public opinion.
And yet toddler knows these things….
You intentionally obfuscate shite. Which is exactly why the public no longer trusts the medical community.
Posted on 1/19/23 at 1:44 pm to LSUAngelHere1
quote:
And yet toddler knows these things….
Is your point that your understanding on the subject matches that of a toddler's?
Posted on 1/19/23 at 1:45 pm to LSUAngelHere1
And yet there's a massive dispute that's contested in politics nevertheless.
Do you and Booga bring pics of Richard into new doctor's visits to vet them on their suitability as health experts?
BTW, I'm curious what this has done to your attitude toward medical care generally - do you bother to seek care, take prescribed medications or other treatments?
Do you and Booga bring pics of Richard into new doctor's visits to vet them on their suitability as health experts?
BTW, I'm curious what this has done to your attitude toward medical care generally - do you bother to seek care, take prescribed medications or other treatments?
This post was edited on 1/19/23 at 1:46 pm
Posted on 1/19/23 at 1:46 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
Do you and Booga bring pics of Richard into new doctor's visits to vet them on their suitability as health experts?
You watch your arse. She saved dozens of people from the possibility of days of mild discomfort.
Page 14 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News