Started By
Message

re: I think it's time for America to cut social security altogether (serious)

Posted on 8/13/24 at 12:10 pm to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476619 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 12:10 pm to
It goes into the trust fund, which has a limited selection of options where to invest the money, under direction of the trustee.

Again, it goes into a general fund for the program.

You're describing how the money in the fund is permitted to be invested.

Then these amounts are put in another fund, which is where the payments are coming from.

You're using semantics to create the aforementioned framing.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138873 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

Pay me back everything I have paid into it plus an appropriate rate of return
Different meme.

"An appropriate rate of return" would increase current payouts by 25-50%.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476619 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

Different meme.

Only slightly.

quote:

An appropriate rate of return" would increase current payouts by 25-50%

Yes it increases the absurdity of the sincerity of the proposal, but the general meme (repay me what I've paid) is still there.

And it's not an option in any way, shape, or form.
Posted by Bandit1980
God's Country
Member since Nov 2019
4613 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 12:16 pm to
Stop, NOW, giving money, medical, and whatever to illegal aliens.




Problem solved.


Oh, and giving any money to any other country.....including Ukraine.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476619 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

Stop, NOW, giving money, medical, and whatever to illegal aliens.




Problem solved.


Oh, and giving any money to any other country.....including Ukraine.


This is the other meme.

Much more silly and illogical.
Posted by riverdiver
Summerville SC
Member since May 2022
2984 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 12:18 pm to
LINK

We’ve given billions of $ to Afghanistan and the Taliban since we pulled out. Billions of $ to Ukraine. Billions of $ to other countries. Pissed away $340 million building a floating pier in Gaza that fell apart.

Stop giving our damn money away.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138873 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

It goes into the trust fund
Nope. The "trust fund" is nothing but an accounting of the debt OBLIGATIONS incurred. Thinking of the SSTF as a physical space where money, treasuries, etc are stored is as silly as Kamala thinking a vast network of servers, AKA "the cloud," is something ethereal in the sky.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476619 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

We’ve given billions of $ to Afghanistan and the Taliban since we pulled out. Billions of $ to Ukraine. Billions of $ to other countries. Pissed away $340 million building a floating pier in Gaza that fell apart.

Stop giving our damn money away.

The 2nd meme, almost B2B!
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476619 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

Thinking of the SSTF as a physical space where money, treasuries, etc are stored is as silly as Kamala thinking a vast network of servers, AKA "the cloud," is something ethereal in the sky.

The taxes go into the fund

The trustee directs the funds to statutorily-approved public "investments", issued by the US Treasury. The tax funds are then held by Treasury, and the redistributive payments are made from this secondary fund.

In no way does this affect the Constitutionality of modifying the program, nor truly distinguishing it from other tax/spend redistributive programs

And, most of all (for the digression), this process in NO way creates any personalized connection between the amount taxed and amount(s) received
This post was edited on 8/13/24 at 12:22 pm
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
24001 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

If not I want my full benefits


What does this mean? You get full benefits when you are 67 or whatever the age is for your group. Take it before and it is a partial benefit. Nobody is going to pay you back your principal amount with interest.
Posted by YouKnowImRight
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2023
2956 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

We’ve given billions of $ to Afghanistan and the Taliban since we pulled out. Billions of $ to Ukraine. Billions of $ to other countries. Pissed away $340 million building a floating pier in Gaza that fell apart.

Stop giving our damn money away.


The US gave around $18 Billion to the UN in 2022. We spent $6.3 Trillion that same year.

$1.2 Trillion on SS
$747 Billion on Medicare
$592 Billion on Medicaid
$581 Billion on income security programs
$482 Billion on Student Loan Programs
$475 Billion on Net Interest.

$751 Billion on defense
$910 billion on discretionary non-military spending.

So our UN dues were less than 0.3% of our expenditures and wouldn't even pay a small fraction of our interest.

You're straining the gnat and swallowing the camel.

2022 Federal Expenditures

ETA: Fixing my math. It's 0.3% not 3%
This post was edited on 8/13/24 at 12:30 pm
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
31395 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

It was never intended to be a pension, annuity, retirement,


It was intended to be a safety net. If you would read a book or two you would know that.

There is still time to cure your ignorance.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138873 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

statutorily-approved public "investments", issued by the US Treasury
AKA US Debt OBLIGATIONS.

Now tell us what happens to other tax money, including that directed to "welfare" programs, when it hits DC. Is any of it converted into US Debt OBLIGATIONS? Is a single 1¢ converted into a US Debt obligation?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138873 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

It was intended to be a safety net.
It was a government borrow from the US workforce MARKETED as a safety net.
Posted by YouKnowImRight
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2023
2956 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

It was intended to be a safety net. If you would read a book or two you would know that.


For who? People who either didn't work or could no longer work.

So again, it was taking from people who worked to pay people who didn't. You can call that a safety net, but it's wealth redistribution like every other government welfare program.
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
31395 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

Then go look at the federal budget


Social Securty is not funded from the Federal Budget. It's a pay as you go plan. If you would only bread a book or two. Maybe read articles from the site I posted you could cure your ignorance instead of screaming at clouds.
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
24001 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

Social Securty is not funded from the Federal Budget. It's a pay as you go plan. If you would only bread a book or two. Maybe read articles from the site I posted you could cure your ignorance instead of screaming at clouds.


But all excess funds in the past were spent on other things. In essence surpluses were part of a budget spend.

I can't find this information. Searches take me everywhere but here. And that is how much money has SS taken in during the life of the program? And, how much money has been paid out in benefits? If anyone can find this, let me know. TaxingAuthority?
This post was edited on 8/13/24 at 12:38 pm
Posted by YouKnowImRight
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2023
2956 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

The US gave around $18 Billion to the UN in 2022. We spent $6.3 Trillion that same year.

$1.2 Trillion on SS
$747 Billion on Medicare
$592 Billion on Medicaid
$581 Billion on income security programs
$482 Billion on Student Loan Programs
$475 Billion on Net Interest.

$751 Billion on defense
$910 billion on discretionary non-military spending.

So our UN dues were less than 0.3% of our expenditures and wouldn't even pay a small fraction of our interest.

You're straining the gnat and swallowing the camel.

2022 Federal Expenditures

ETA: Fixing my math. It's 0.3% not 3%


Just noticed something else.

In 2022 we spent $2.54 trillion on SS, Medicare, Medicaid.

We took in $1.5 trillion in payroll taxes.

That means we had a $1 trillion deficit in entitlement spending.

That's a lot more than our entire military budget.
This post was edited on 8/13/24 at 12:34 pm
Posted by bluedragon
Birmingham
Member since May 2020
9541 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 12:34 pm to
reparations for the young.

never work out .....
Posted by LatinTiger30
New Orleans
Member since Oct 2007
4822 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 12:36 pm to
The problem is Social Security Disability. The government has made it to easy for people to get on SSDI and they give the funds away to undeserving people and immigrants.
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram