- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Hypothetical: Could the USSC Mandate Voter ID in Every State?
Posted on 2/3/26 at 8:28 pm to imjustafatkid
Posted on 2/3/26 at 8:28 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
The USSC recreated Obamacare as a tax in order to avoid issuing what was the correct ruling in the case.
And?
Posted on 2/3/26 at 8:29 pm to KCT
quote:
I simply asked a hypothetical question, bitch
I answered it in totality on page 1.
You replied to a post talking about something else.
quote:
Do you hold a grudge
No. That's dumb.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 8:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And?
Nothing. That's it. What I stated was correct. Thanks for confirming.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 8:30 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
He's wrong about nearly everything.
And yet, I know who passed the ACA or how Ogberfell came to be, unlike some other posters ITT
Posted on 2/3/26 at 8:30 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Nothing. That's it.
Then you've failed at making a relevant point.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 8:31 pm to KCT
At lease my wife and I both finished middle school and know better than to think the USSC can pass federal law

Posted on 2/3/26 at 8:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You have a fundamental misunderstanding of the basics of our government, which seems to be a common thing in this thread.
I understand our govt just fine. I also understand SCOTUS overturned the vote of the people of CA, and state laws against gay "marriage". Essentially creating federal law.
This post was edited on 2/3/26 at 8:33 pm
Posted on 2/3/26 at 8:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No. That's dumb.
There's a reason why 75% of this board thinks you're full of shite. It's because you are.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 8:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Then you've failed at making a relevant point.
This is what happens when SFP loses an argument.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 8:33 pm to HagaDaga
quote:
Essentially creating federal law.
Naw
Posted on 2/3/26 at 8:34 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
This is what happens when SFP loses an argument.
No. I understand who passes laws and that the USSC cannot.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 8:34 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
They created the Obamacare that was enacted. Congress did not.
You guys kill me.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 8:34 pm to KCT
quote:
There's a reason why 75% of this board thinks you're full of shite.
Yeah. THEY hold grudges, apparently.
I don't. That's dumb.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 8:34 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
You guys kill me.
YOU JUST LOST BRO
Posted on 2/3/26 at 8:34 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Naw
They sure did.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 8:35 pm to KCT
quote:
I simply asked a hypothetical question, bitch.
Ruh roh, Karla's angry
It was an insanely dumb thread, even by your very low standards.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 8:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Yeah. THEY hold grudges, apparently
They don't hold grudges. They've simply figured you out. You're easy to read. It's the same stupid shtick over and over again.
This post was edited on 2/3/26 at 8:38 pm
Posted on 2/3/26 at 8:36 pm to HagaDaga
quote:
They sure did.
Ruling a statute is unconstitutional =/= creating a law (aka legislation, aka creating those statutes)
Posted on 2/3/26 at 8:37 pm to KCT
quote:
They don't hold grudges. They've simply figured you out.
If they haven't realized how often they look dumb and are wrong, they haven't really figured much out.
This thread is a great place to realize they have not figured much out
Posted on 2/3/26 at 8:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I understand who passes laws and that the USSC cannot.
You have the inability to understand that people aren't saying they are technically able to do it, but their decisions have/can by effect.
Popular
Back to top



1





