- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Huge! Senator Johnson sends letter about documented JAB induced military health issues
Posted on 2/4/22 at 11:49 pm to Diamondawg
Posted on 2/4/22 at 11:49 pm to Diamondawg
quote:
Cancers do not develop over a year much less to the extent this reads.
They didn't use to do this in most cases - maybe something changed?
0
Posted on 2/4/22 at 11:55 pm to Passing Wind
quote:
Based on medical data known previous to the mass dispersement of an experimental vaccine. One which they made you sign a disclaimer on as being for emergency use only & not approved. You have zero way of determining your statement now.
FDA Fully Approves Moderna Vaccine
Posted on 2/5/22 at 12:21 am to Cajun Tiger 4
This tells us little about general population. Microcosm, sure, maybe, but nothing to support that. Myriad of factors oversimplified by this letter. Could be absolutely true, but I see flaws with the data.
Wouldn’t one expect diagnoses to be considerably higher in number in 2021? It seems like including 2020 data, during lockdowns, lessens significance of a 5-year average, weighted by 2020 data (absence thereof, essentially), only to further conflate by then directly comparing to 2021 data inflated by delayed diagnoses?
Would one expect 1,000% increase? Of course not. But, I’d assume the letter involved the highlights - spikes in conditions likely attributed to an unknown number of factors which may or may not include the vaccine?
Wouldn’t one expect diagnoses to be considerably higher in number in 2021? It seems like including 2020 data, during lockdowns, lessens significance of a 5-year average, weighted by 2020 data (absence thereof, essentially), only to further conflate by then directly comparing to 2021 data inflated by delayed diagnoses?
Would one expect 1,000% increase? Of course not. But, I’d assume the letter involved the highlights - spikes in conditions likely attributed to an unknown number of factors which may or may not include the vaccine?
Posted on 2/5/22 at 2:47 am to AmosMosesAndTwins
quote:
only to further conflate by then directly comparing to 2021 data inflated by delayed diagnoses?
quote:
Guillain-Barre syndrome – 551% increase
Pulmonary embolism – 468% increase
Migraines – 452%
Tachycardia – 302% increase
Not exactly some things that get delayed in diagnosing.
Posted on 2/5/22 at 2:53 am to DMAN1968
quote:
Not exactly some things that get delayed in diagnosing.
Fair point. I guess I mean more that the frickery of 2020 led to later diagnoses, not delayed, and things like disruption to routine doctor visits, elective procedures and such, should be considered as potential contributing factors.
Posted on 2/5/22 at 3:07 am to AmosMosesAndTwins
quote:
should be considered as potential contributing factors.
Go ahead and cut those % in half if it tickles your hoohaa. Still, at half impact, highly concerning and ,to the logical brain, damning.
Posted on 2/5/22 at 3:27 am to AmosMosesAndTwins
quote:
should be considered as potential contributing factors.
As should the vaccine. Basically what the Senators letter is asking about.
quote:
If so, please explain what actions DoD has taken to investigate the root cause for the
increases in these diagnoses.
Posted on 2/5/22 at 4:27 am to AmosMosesAndTwins
quote:
delayed, and things like disruption to routine doctor visits, elective procedures and such, should be considered as potential contributing factors.
You do make some decent points but the time since the vax had come out can't account for the increases that are happening even if every diagnoses we're delayed.
Posted on 2/5/22 at 5:41 am to Cajun Tiger 4
He is one of the few good guys doing actual work.
Posted on 2/5/22 at 10:19 am to AmosMosesAndTwins
You seem special.
Posted on 2/5/22 at 11:16 am to ShoeBang
quote:
Go ahead and cut those % in half if it tickles your hoohaa. Still, at half impact, highly concerning and ,to the logical brain, damning.
I’ll agree it’s concerning, but not damning.
Posted on 2/6/22 at 7:40 am to AmosMosesAndTwins
quote:pre-2021 data is incomplete but 2021 is accurate. That surely explains the discrepancies lol. Clown world continues
The DoD responded that the DMED (Defense Medical Epidemiology Database) data from 2016 to 2020 that the whistleblowers brought up was erroneous and incomplete, and is currently under review.
Posted on 2/6/22 at 7:49 am to AmosMosesAndTwins
quote:
I’ll agree it’s concerning
More than reason alone to stop forcing this shite of people who generally don’t need the vax in the first place.
Posted on 2/6/22 at 8:37 am to Cajun Tiger 4
Wow...a letter.
Posted on 2/6/22 at 8:44 am to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
pre-2021 data is incomplete but 2021 is accurate. That surely explains the discrepancies lol. Clown world continues
Garbage in. Garbage out.
Posted on 2/6/22 at 9:37 am to Cosmo
quote:
Esophageal cancer isnt one of them. Takes several years to develop
Which only points to the fact that there is widespread undercounting in the prior data relative to 2021, consistent with the DOD position that the data is erroneous and incomplete.
Posted on 2/6/22 at 10:21 am to MikeTheTiger71
quote:its suddenly been taken offline until they can determine the cause of the "corruption." Again, lol
Which only points to the fact that there is widespread undercounting in the prior data relative to 2021,
Posted on 2/6/22 at 2:06 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
its suddenly been taken offline until they can determine the cause of the "corruption." Again, lol
So the fact that conditions that couldn’t possibly be caused by the vaccine show the same ridiculous pattern doesn’t suggest to you that the data is unreliable?
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News