Started By
Message

re: How We Are Going to the Moon - NASA

Posted on 12/23/19 at 7:52 pm to
Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
22757 posts
Posted on 12/23/19 at 7:52 pm to
Posted by DreauxB2015
Member since Nov 2015
7908 posts
Posted on 12/23/19 at 7:53 pm to
Thanks for your intelligent input on our discussion. Bravo sir ShortySac!
Posted by Plx1776
Member since Oct 2017
18091 posts
Posted on 12/23/19 at 7:58 pm to
Oh lordy. It's a moon landing denier.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 12/23/19 at 7:59 pm to
quote:


Thanks for your intelligent input on our discussion. Bravo sir ShortySac


LOL

Nothing about your posts requires an intelligent response.

You lack the intellect to receive it
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 12/23/19 at 8:01 pm to
quote:


Oh lordy. It's a moon landing denier


It's not their denial that's amusing

It's their "scientific" reasons for it that crack me up.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
41933 posts
Posted on 12/23/19 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

If you believe we went and the video transmission from The moon to earth was delivered to television in realtime with 1960 tech then you’re mentally disabled. It didnt happen like they want us to believe or at all .


“ space may be the final frontier but its made in
A hollywood basement”


Posted by BurningHeart
Member since Jan 2017
9949 posts
Posted on 12/23/19 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

So video transmission to television in real time from a satellite on the moon from 250k miles away with no delay or interruption and its correlation with anything having to with the speed of light is very Interdasting considering I lose reception on direct TV when its to
Windy outside cuck . Try harder.


Because your Direct TV tech is on the same par as NASA

This is not computer tech.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 12/23/19 at 8:07 pm to
quote:

So video transmission to television in real time from a satellite on the moon from 250k miles away with no delay


I want to know what the moron means by this "no delay" thing.

Mostly because I need the laugh
Posted by DreauxB2015
Member since Nov 2015
7908 posts
Posted on 12/23/19 at 8:08 pm to
Why because you said so ? Lol nice one .
Posted by DreauxB2015
Member since Nov 2015
7908 posts
Posted on 12/23/19 at 8:09 pm to
From 50 years ago yes .
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 12/23/19 at 8:12 pm to
quote:


Why because you said so


No. Your posts lack intelligence whether I point it out or not.
Posted by BurningHeart
Member since Jan 2017
9949 posts
Posted on 12/23/19 at 8:12 pm to
quote:

I want to know what the moron means by this "no delay" thing.

Mostly because I need the laugh



I'm wondering that too. He probably thinks they were talking in real-time, and since their talking matched with their video, the video must have not had a delay

Watch this be the case
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 12/23/19 at 8:14 pm to
quote:


I'm wondering that too. He probably thinks they were talking in real-time, and since their talking matched with their video, the video must have not had a delay

Watch this be the case


Don't mess me up man. I want to see his explanation

Cause it's gonna be hilarious
Posted by blackrose890
Fayetteville, AR
Member since Apr 2009
6383 posts
Posted on 12/23/19 at 8:16 pm to
quote:

250k miles
quote:

250k miles


So (250,000)/(186,000) is about a 1.3 second travel time. How much physics do you know?

Edit: accidentally screwed up big time and used a light year instead of the speed of light.
This post was edited on 12/23/19 at 8:26 pm
Posted by DreauxB2015
Member since Nov 2015
7908 posts
Posted on 12/23/19 at 8:16 pm to
And here we are arguing about nothing because you came with facts right? Thanks for dropping those truth bombs .
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 12/23/19 at 8:17 pm to
quote:


So (250,000)/(6.706x10^8) is about a .004 second travel time

Don't help this guy. LOL

quote:

How much physics do you know?

He got his PhD from YouTube University
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 12/23/19 at 8:18 pm to
quote:


And here we are arguing about nothing because you came with facts right? Thanks for dropping those truth bombs

Let me know when you believe you've supplied a fact
Posted by blackrose890
Fayetteville, AR
Member since Apr 2009
6383 posts
Posted on 12/23/19 at 8:23 pm to
Btw if you enjoy things like moon hoaxes and the like. I wholly recommend looking at the most hilarious group of deniers. The Flat Earthers, the truly amazing at misunderstanding even the most simple of subjects.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 12/23/19 at 8:25 pm to
quote:

The Flat Earthers, the truly amazing at misunderstanding even the most simple of subjects.


These people are next level stupid

It always feels like it HAS to be a troll
This post was edited on 12/23/19 at 8:26 pm
Posted by Amadeo
Member since Jan 2004
4880 posts
Posted on 12/23/19 at 8:27 pm to
quote:

It's their "scientific" reasons for it that crack me up.

Certainly understood, but to be fair, we are talking about an agency discussing the possibility of putting astronauts in suspended animation (hibernation) on their voyage to Mars, while at the same time trying to convince the public that they are on a trajectory to reach said planet by 2033.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram