Started By
Message

re: How much better off we would all be if the South had been permitted to secede

Posted on 8/8/25 at 8:26 am to
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
53128 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 8:26 am to
quote:

And don't think abolitionists in the North would have been training and funding guerrilla warfare by slaves at some point.


The USA funding guerilla warfare in a neighboring country in order to cause chaos and destruction in that neighboring country?

You're right. The USA would certainly have done that to the independent CSA, because the USA has done that constantly in history.

But what do you think that the wild-eyed Southern boys would have done in response to that kind of thing?
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
73651 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 4:15 pm to
My southern brothers always leave this out of any discussion of the Civil War.
We bought em and bred them by the millions for one reason. fantastic profit by the elites and aristocracy of the South..
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
56564 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 4:27 pm to
The North wouldn't have millions of people in chains waiting to revolt.
Posted by BuckI
Grove City, Ohio
Member since Oct 2020
6920 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 4:33 pm to
Without the industrial might and population of the north, the south would have been taken over by Mexico or some European power who would be aided by slaves who rose in revolt.
Posted by UtahCajun
Member since Jul 2021
2722 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 4:50 pm to
Even if the south were allowed to secede, the two nations most likely would have kissed, made up and rejoined each other within a couple decades.
Posted by cyarrr
Prairieville
Member since Jun 2017
3906 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

Doubt it. The north and the west would not have been shackled by a dirt poor, unindustrialized South.


There were only 34 states at the start of the civil war, the west was for the most part a vast nothingness.
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
53128 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

The North wouldn't have millions of people in chains waiting to revolt.


Fomenting, funding and promoting a terrorist guerilla war against Southern women and children does sound just like something that the United States of America would do to an independent Confederate States of America.

IMHO the CSA would have no choice but to respond in kind.
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
53128 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

Even if the south were allowed to secede, the two nations most likely would have kissed, made up and rejoined each other within a couple decades.


Maybe.
Posted by Sizzle_DAWG
Sanford Stadium
Member since Jan 2024
1599 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 10:20 pm to
It’s complicated
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
53128 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 10:24 pm to
quote:

I wonder if we'd be a member of the Commonwealth of Nations given our past status as a colony and the heavy Anglophilia in places like Virginia, South Carolina and Georgia. 90 years separate SC's secession and the London Declaration, which allowed republics to join the Commonwealth.


Unless slavery was abolished, IMHO Great Britain wanted no part of allowing the CSA to become a part of the Commonwealth of Great Britain.

However, I do believe that World War One might have ended more early with an ALLIED victory because the CSA would have sent some Divisions over to the Western Front to help Britain and France. When we examine the unique Culture of the American South, we can see that it comes directly from pastoral English Culture of the 18th Century. The Confederate whites felt very close to this English Culture and IMHO they would have been willing to fight alongside British Divisions in WW 1.

The CSA would have helped Britain, not stayed neutral.
Posted by Sizzle_DAWG
Sanford Stadium
Member since Jan 2024
1599 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 10:26 pm to
We likely would not have morphed into a 20th century superpower and had a robust middle class.
Not really a fan of Spike Lee, but he did a pretty funny mockumentary about 20 years ago centered around if the South had won the war.
Worth watching if you haven’t seen it.
Posted by Torquemada
Member since Dec 2024
83 posts
Posted on 8/9/25 at 10:24 am to
quote:

the south would have been taken over by Mexico

You are one seriously stupid MF.
Posted by BuckI
Grove City, Ohio
Member since Oct 2020
6920 posts
Posted on 8/9/25 at 10:51 am to
quote:

You are one seriously stupid MF.
The South had no industry, and agriculture was stagnant. There was no other way the war could have ended, but if the South had won, another power would have come in and swept up the pieces.
Posted by UtahCajun
Member since Jul 2021
2722 posts
Posted on 8/9/25 at 10:57 am to
quote:

The South had no industry, and agriculture was stagnant. There was no other way the war could have ended,


A certain famine on a certain European island had more to do with northern victory than industrialization did. The CSA was handing the Union its arse fairly early on. It was an influx of able bodied men willing to fight for citizenship that helped the union, whose native population really had no desire to fight.
This post was edited on 8/9/25 at 11:01 am
Posted by UtahCajun
Member since Jul 2021
2722 posts
Posted on 8/9/25 at 11:00 am to
quote:

Maybe


Eh, the idustrial revolution was the death nail to slavery. It was on the way out.

Oil discoveries in West Virginia and south into Oklahoma and Texas would have brought talks to the table.

I feel foreign powers trying to play games in North America would have caused both sides to come back together.

But maybe I am wrong. Who knows. I am glad it ended the way it did.
Posted by Hateradedrink
Member since May 2023
3873 posts
Posted on 8/9/25 at 11:07 am to
If by “America”, you mean the actual United states the would have existed after (the north), they would have been much better off judging by the amount of federal dollars the south currently receives.
This post was edited on 8/9/25 at 11:08 am
Posted by BuckI
Grove City, Ohio
Member since Oct 2020
6920 posts
Posted on 8/9/25 at 11:22 am to
The Irish were a great asset; the North could easily replace soldiers and weapons, while the South could not. With the blockade preventing the South from receiving much-needed supplies, it was only a matter of time. After some initial struggle, Lincoln finally put capable leaders in charge.

I'm not disparaging the South. I enjoy my visits there, and the people I met were awesome.
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
56564 posts
Posted on 8/9/25 at 11:27 am to
Oh please. The blockade took away the South's ability to wage war.

Ask Germany how a blockade worked out in 1918.
Posted by Tree_Fall
Member since Mar 2021
1072 posts
Posted on 8/9/25 at 12:40 pm to
Only partially agree. The southern planter class gave us the elite public colleges of the south to educate themselves...LSU, Ole Miss, UNC. The also influenced the creation of southern private schools like Duke, Tulane, Emory, etc. They certainly never intended to educate the common man.

Do agree that the class was mostly disinterested in industrialization since most made their money from the production of their inherited land. The planters who had oil land are another story,
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
56564 posts
Posted on 8/9/25 at 1:11 pm to
BS.

Huey gave us LSU. Was a hamlet before he built it up.

The planters are the ones who stuck Mississippi universities in rural small towns away from the population centers. They wanted only the rich kids to go to those schools.

That little decision really puts Mississippi at a disadvantage for economic development and recruiting industries since companies like an area to have a good university, airport, labor pool, and sizable managerial pool to recruit from. Golden Triangle is nice but nothing like other states.
This post was edited on 8/9/25 at 3:00 pm
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram